How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Blocks and defect groups of s3
Example
For a splitting field and , put . In characteristic the two blocks are and , with defect groups respectively the Sylow subgroups and , and . In characteristic there is just one block, with Sylow defect .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group, splitting field and primes stated above.
The block containing the trivial module has Sylow defect. (Principal block has sylow defect)
Over a splitting field defect-zero blocks are matrix algebras, and conversely. (Defect zero blocks are simple algebras)
Defect groups are maximal nonzero Brauer-support subgroups. (Defect groups are maximal Brauer support)
Verification
In characteristic , put and . Since , one has and , with and . A transposition conjugates to , so both idempotents are central. Also , and has basis , with . Thus it is . An element is a unit exactly when its constant term in is nonzero, by a two-term geometric inverse. This local algebra has no nontrivial idempotent, so is primitive central.
Define matrices and over . Direct multiplication gives and . These are the relations of : the relations reduce every word to one of with , , and the actual permutations give six distinct forms. Hence defines a representation and its linear extension is an algebra map. One has . The four matrices span : the standard matrix units are , , , and . They are the images of . These four group-algebra elements form a basis of , since are independent in , span that ideal by , and the two cosets of have disjoint supports. Thus the restriction of is a surjective map between four-dimensional algebras, hence an isomorphism . Its centre is , so is primitive and are all blocks. The augmentation of is , so acts as identity on the trivial module and is principal. This calculation uses no root of unity in .
For , direct commutation in gives . Neither nor centralizes , hence and . All nontrivial -subgroups are transposition subgroups. At , the image of is . Thus [F3] gives Sylow defect for and defect for , agreeing with [F1] for the principal block and [F2] for the explicitly computed matrix block.
In characteristic , let be the sum of the three transpositions and . The centre has basis , because commuting with all group elements is equivalent to having constant coefficients on conjugacy classes. Direct multiplication gives , , and . Thus satisfies , and the centre is . For with , the equation is and . The first equation gives or ; in both cases in characteristic , so . Therefore the only central idempotents are . There is one block, necessarily principal; [F1] gives defect .
Sources
Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245 (standard reference, not scraped)