How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bochner–Martinelli on the unit ball
Example
Assume AC. For , let be the unit ball, oriented by , and orient outward-normal-first. With the kernel from The normalized Bochner–Martinelli kernel,
These are the boundary reproducing values at the origin for the constant function and the coordinate functions .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, , the unit ball , and the orientation and kernel convention above.
For , is the normalized sum with coefficient and the th omitted wedge form (The normalized Bochner–Martinelli kernel).
Under full AC, the Bochner–Martinelli formula applies to a bounded domain and a function on its closure; if the function is holomorphic, its interior term vanishes (The Bochner–Martinelli formula for C1 functions).
Full AC means every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice); the formula in [F2] explicitly assumes AC.
For an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism of oriented manifolds and a compactly supported top form , (Change of variables on oriented manifolds).
Proof
The unit ball is bounded with smooth boundary, , and the constant function is holomorphic and smooth on ; the full-AC hypothesis supplies the stated premise of [F2] by [F3]. Applying [F2] at to gives , since the holomorphic case in [F2] has zero interior term.
Fix and define on ; by the explicit kernel [F1], each coefficient gains while its wedge part, with factors and factors , gains , so and .
The restriction of is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism of the oriented sphere : its ambient real determinant is and it carries outward radial normals to outward radial normals. The form is smooth on the compact sphere, hence compactly supported there. With , [F4] and step 1.2 give . Taking yields , hence . This calculation also covers , since the kernel has one holomorphic differential and no antiholomorphic differentials in that case.
The integrals therefore equal and for the constant and coordinate functions, respectively; both are holomorphic on , so these explicit values agree with the holomorphic cases of [F2]. [F2, step 1.1, step 2.1, given, algebra]
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, v4.4, Chapter 5 §5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)