How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The standard embedding is the canonical complexification map
Example
Take with its standard real basis . The identification
carries the canonical embedding of Complexification as with its canonical real-linear embedding to the standard inclusion that views a real coordinate vector as a complex one. For both sides are the zero space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard real basis of and the canonical embedding .
The complexification carries the scalar action and the real-linear embedding (Complexification as with its canonical real-linear embedding).
The map , , is a complex-linear isomorphism with inverse (The tensor and direct-sum models of complexification are canonically complex-linearly isomorphic).
A real ordered basis becomes a complex ordered basis after complexification (A real basis becomes a complex basis after complexification, so ).
Verification
The list is a real basis of by definition of the standard basis.
By [L2], through , and the assignment , taken coordinatewise, is a complex-linear isomorphism : complex scalar multiplication is sent to .
Composing, the element maps to and then to the th standard complex vector scaled by ; additivity extends this to every tensor.
For one has , which step 2.1 sends to ; this is exactly the standard inclusion of into , and by [L3] the images form the complex basis of the complexification.
Steps 1.2 and 3.1 identify the complexification with and the canonical embedding with the standard inclusion.
Depends on
- Complexification as $\mathbb C\otimes_{\mathbb R}V$ with its canonical real-linear embedding
- The tensor and direct-sum models of complexification are canonically complex-linearly isomorphic
- A real basis becomes a complex basis after complexification, so $\dim_{\mathbb C}(\mathbb C\otimes_{\mathbb R}V)=\dim_{\mathbb R}V$
Used by
- FALSE: complexification doubles finite dimension False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Complexification (notes) (standard reference, not scraped)