How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The extended affine Weyl group and non-trivial alcove stabilizers
Example
Let be a reduced crystallographic root system spanning the finite-dimensional real inner-product space , with affine walls and affine reflection group as in Affine root hyperplanes, coroot translations, alcoves, and the affine reflection group. Let be the componentwise fundamental alcove from Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove, and let and be the coroot and coweight lattices from Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices. Define the extended affine Weyl group using the natural Weyl action on .
The affine group is a normal subgroup, and where is finite abelian. The extended group acts transitively on alcoves. If , then the quotient map restricts to an isomorphism ; through this isomorphism the quotient acts faithfully on the vertices of . Thus every alcove stabilizer in the extended group is conjugate to , while the affine stabilizer of is trivial by Alcove separation, facet reflections, panel types, and triviality of the fundamental alcove stabilizer (2).
For a concrete non-trivial case, in take with , , and , with positive roots . Then and . The coweight quotient is cyclic of order . The closure of the fundamental alcove has vertices , , and . The element cyclically permutes these three vertices and the three facet walls, so . Consequently does not act freely on alcoves and, in this A2 case, is a strict extension of the Coxeter group generated by the affine facet reflections. More generally, whenever is non-trivial, the extended group is strictly larger than the reflection-generated affine Coxeter group. No axiom of choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The root-system, affine-wall, coroot, coweight-lattice, and componentwise-fundamental-alcove conventions above.
is generated by the simple coroots; consists of the vectors pairing integrally with every root; both are full-rank lattices, and . The simple-coroot basis and its integral generation of all coroots are proved in Affine reflections: translation form, involutivity, local finiteness, and , proof step 1.5 (Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices).
The external semidirect product has multiplication for the natural action ( The external semidirect product ).
is generated by the orthogonal root reflections, permutes , and (Weyl group, Coroot and dual root system).
The affine reflections are and ; the affine walls and their arrangement are preserved by these reflections (Affine root hyperplanes, coroot translations, alcoves, and the affine reflection group, Affine reflections: translation form, involutivity, local finiteness, and ).
The fundamental alcove is a finite product of bounded geometric simplices; in the irreducible A2 model its region is , , (Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove).
The stabilizer of in is trivial (Alcove separation, facet reflections, panel types, and triviality of the fundamental alcove stabilizer).
The fundamental affine facet reflections generate , and acts simply transitively on alcoves; in particular the presentation makes the Coxeter group with those simple generators (Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function).
If an integer matrix has nonzero determinant, then is finite of order (The index of a full-rank subgroup of is the absolute determinant of a generating matrix).
A reduced crystallographic root system is finite and spanning, invariant under root reflections, crystallographic, and reduced (Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system).
The simple roots form a real basis and every root has integral coordinates of one sign in that basis (Simple roots form a signed integral basis).
Verification
Given: The root-system data, the affine action, and the lattice definitions above.
Suppose , let be a simple-root basis, and let be the dual basis for . By [F10], every root is an integer combination of the simple roots, so the condition defining is equivalent to for every ; hence . By [F1], the simple coroots form a real basis and generate . Their coordinate matrix in the basis has entries and is invertible, since its columns are a real basis. Thus corresponds to , and [F8] shows is finite of order . It is abelian because both lattices are additive groups.
For the displayed set, the roots span , have squared norm , and occupy the six directions that are multiples of . The mirror of a root reflection is perpendicular to its root, so if the root direction is , reflection sends a root direction to and preserves the six roots. The possible Cartan numbers are , and each root line contains only the two displayed signs. Thus [F9] verifies the reduced crystallographic root-system axioms. Choose ; these are exactly the roots positive on , since and . Then are simple and is highest. The coroots are by [F3]. The vectors and satisfy , so they are the dual coweight basis. In this basis the simple coroots have columns and , giving the matrix of determinant . By [F8], has order . The class of is nonzero because solving this matrix equation for gives , not an integer vector; also . Hence generates the quotient.
The Weyl group preserves , since for every root , and it preserves because it permutes coroots. For a root reflection, . If , the last coefficient is integral, so every root reflection, and hence all of , acts trivially on . By [F2], , so , , is a homomorphism; it is onto and has kernel by [F4]. Thus with the stated quotient. Translations by shift each wall level by the integer , while permutes roots, so preserves the wall arrangement and its alcoves.
Let . If and , then and [F6] gives ; hence is injective. For any , is an alcove by step 2.1. By [F7] choose carrying to . Then , and its quotient class is , so is onto. This representative is unique by injectivity. The closure of is a full-dimensional product of simplices by [F5], so its vertices affinely span . An affine isometry fixing all those vertices is the identity; therefore , and hence the quotient via , acts faithfully on the vertex set of . The action of on alcoves is transitive because its subgroup is transitive by [F7]; if , then .
By [F5], the fundamental alcove is the triangle interior cut out by , , and . The simple-root walls meet at ; solving , gives , and solving , gives . From the root-reflection formula in [F3], and . Thus sends to and to . With , the element therefore sends . It fixes the triangle's centroid and cyclically permutes its vertices and facet walls, so it is a 120-degree rotation. In particular and . Since by steps 3.1 and 1.2, and has order . Thus the extended action is not free on alcoves, and this extended group is strictly larger than the Coxeter group generated by its affine facet reflections.
If , spanning forces , so and both affine groups are trivial. In rank one, with , the coweight generator satisfies and , so the quotient is ; swaps the two vertices of the fundamental interval and stabilizes it. For reducible , the simple-root and simple-coroot bases, the lattices, their quotient, the affine groups, and the fundamental alcove split over the orthogonal components, so the preceding proof applies factorwise. The only choice in step 3.1 is the element whose existence follows from transitivity; injectivity makes it unique for each coset, and no axiom of choice is used.
Remarks
Open Step-3 supplier obligation. The current-run draft supplier thm-cg-affine-alcove-transitivity-presentation-and-length is used in Fact F7 and proof steps 3.1 and 4.1 for affine-alcove transitivity, the fundamental-facet Coxeter presentation, and the stabilizer quotient representative. Its item decision remains escalated because its proof uses draft lem-cg-affine-generic-gallery-paths-and-disk-moves and draft def-hh-coxeter-matrix-word-group-and-length. The gallery supplier itself remains escalated for its uses of draft lem-cg-affine-point-stabilizers-and-vertex-residues and the Coxeter definition; the residue supplier lem-cg-affine-point-stabilizers-and-vertex-residues remains escalated for draft lem-cg-integer-pairings-and-allowed-dihedral-labels in its proof step 2.4 and draft def-hh-coxeter-matrix-word-group-and-length in its proof step 5.1. These supplier uses remain provisional pending their completed Step-3 decisions, so this example's item decision remains escalated.
Depends on
- Affine root hyperplanes, coroot translations, alcoves, and the affine reflection group
- Affine reflections: translation form, involutivity, local finiteness, and $W_a=Q^\vee\rtimes W$
- Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove
- Alcove separation, facet reflections, panel types, and triviality of the fundamental alcove stabilizer
- Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function
- Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices
- The external semidirect product $N\rtimes_\alpha H$
- Weyl group
- Coroot and dual root system
- Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system
- Simple roots form a signed integral basis
- The index of a full-rank subgroup of $\mathbb Z^n$ is the absolute determinant of a generating matrix
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Magyar, Schubert classes of a loop group (arXiv:0705.3826) (standard reference, not scraped)
- D. Vogan, Affine Weyl group alcoves and the geometry of the unitary dual (MIT colloquium slides, 2022/2024) (standard reference, not scraped)