How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reflection matrices in a positive plane, a Lorentzian plane, and a plane with radical
Example
Let be a symmetric bilinear form on a real vector space and let with . Define , using the same formula as The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps. Step 1.1 below proves directly that this is a linear involution preserving and fixing pointwise for this general . In the three cases take , whose functions have domain (The vector space of all functions with pointwise operations, and as the case ), and relabel coordinates by , and standard unit vectors by , respectively (The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ). Each matrix is taken in the ordered basis ; inertia is as in Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form.
(i) Positive plane. the dot product, , so . Then , , i.e. and has inertia : a Euclidean reflection across the line .
(ii) Lorentzian plane. , of inertia , and , so . Then , , i.e. and preserves : , , .
(iii) Plane with radical. , of inertia and radical (The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space), and : then , i.e. and , with fixed hyperplane . The vector is -null, so the displayed formula does not define a reflection with normal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with its ordered standard basis , a symmetric bilinear form on , and with ; , using the formula of The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, and all matrices below are taken in the basis .
The reflection is defined only for ; the radical is the set of with for every , and the inertia of a form presented by a diagonal matrix with positive, negative and zero diagonal entries is (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space, Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form).
A symmetric bilinear form is linear in each variable and satisfies (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms).
is the function space on ; with the relabelling , and standard unit vectors , one has (The vector space of all functions with pointwise operations, and as the case , The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ).
is an ordered field, so the elementary arithmetic of the fractions below is the field arithmetic of ; in particular and (The reals form a totally ordered field).
Verification
General reflection identities. Put . Bilinearity makes linear, gives , and hence . The formula gives and fixes every with ; conversely forces , since and . Finally, symmetry and bilinearity give . Thus the algebraic identities hold for every symmetric , without requiring it to be a Coxeter form.
Positive plane. Take the dot product, so and , and take , for which . Here and , so giving . Squaring, , and . The dot product has inertia and fixes pointwise, the Euclidean reflection across that line.
Lorentzian plane. Take , of inertia , and , so , and . Then so , whose square is and whose determinant is . The invariance identities hold on the basis: , , and , so preserves by bilinearity.
Plane with radical. Take , whose matrix has inertia and whose radical is , and take , so and . Hence and , that is , and its fixed hyperplane is . The vector is -null, , so the displayed formula assigns it no reflection.
Conclusion. In each of the three cases satisfies and the displayed matrix is in the ordered basis : an involution with determinant in the two nondegenerate cases, with the inertia readings and of the form and the fixed hyperplane computed above, and in the degenerate case the fixed hyperplane coincides with the radical . These explicit numbers verify the general identities proved in step 1.1 and display why the hypothesis of [F1] is exactly what the definition of requires: the null vector of the last case is a normal for which no reflection is defined by the displayed formula.
Depends on
- The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
- Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order
- Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms
- Bilinear forms on $V$ correspond linearly and bijectively to linear maps $V\to V^*$
- The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space
- Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia $(p,q,r)$, rank $p+q$, and signature $p-q$ of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form
- The vector space $F^{X}$ of all functions $X \to F$ with pointwise operations, and $F^{n}$ as the case $X = n = \{0, 1, \dots, n-1\}$
- The standard list $e : n \to F^{n}$ with $e_i(i) = 1_F$ and $e_i(j) = 0_F$ for $j \ne i$ is an ordered basis of $F^{n}$; hence $\dim_F F^{n} = n$, and $F^{0}$ is the zero space with basis $\varnothing$ and dimension $0$
- The reals form a totally ordered field
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael W. Davis, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups (Princeton University Press; author's full institutional PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anders Björner and Francesco Brenti, Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups (Graduate Texts in Mathematics 231, Springer 2005) (standard reference, not scraped)