Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reflection matrices in a positive plane, a Lorentzian plane, and a plane with radical

Example

Let B be a symmetric bilinear form on a real vector space V and let a∈V with B(a,a)≠0. Define ra(v):=v−2B(v,a)a/B(a,a), using the same formula as The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps. Step 1.1 below proves directly that this is a linear involution preserving B and fixing ker⁡B(−,a) pointwise for this general B. In the three cases take V=R2, whose functions have domain {0,1} (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}), and relabel coordinates by x1:=x(0), x2:=x(1) and standard unit vectors by e1,e2, respectively (The standard list e:n→Fn with ei(i)=1F and ei(j)=0F for j≠i is an ordered basis of Fn; hence dim⁡FFn=n, and F0 is the zero space with basis ∅ and dimension 0). Each matrix is taken in the ordered basis (e1,e2); inertia is as in Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form.

(i) Positive plane. B the dot product, a=35e1+45e2, so B(a,a)=1. Then ra(e1)=725e1−2425e2, ra(e2)=−2425e1−725e2, i.e. [ra]=125(7−24−24−7),[ra]2=I2,det⁡[ra]=−1, and B has inertia (2,0,0): a Euclidean reflection across the line R(−4e1+3e2).

(ii) Lorentzian plane. B(x,y)=x1y1−x2y2, of inertia (1,1,0), and a=2e1+e2, so B(a,a)=3. Then ra(e1)=−53e1−43e2, ra(e2)=43e1+53e2, i.e. [ra]=13(−54−45),[ra]2=I2,det⁡[ra]=−1, and [ra] preserves B: B(rae1,rae1)=1, B(rae2,rae2)=−1, B(rae1,rae2)=0.

(iii) Plane with radical. B(x,y)=x1y1, of inertia (1,0,1) and radical rad⁡(B)=Re2 (The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space), and a=e1: then ra=diag(−1,1), i.e. ra(e1)=−e1 and ra(e2)=e2, with fixed hyperplane ker⁡B(−,e1)=Re2=rad⁡(B). The vector e2 is B-null, so the displayed formula does not define a reflection with normal e2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: V=R2 with its ordered standard basis e1,e2, a symmetric bilinear form B on V, and a∈V with B(a,a)≠0; ra(v):=v−2B(v,a)B(a,a)a, using the formula of The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, and all matrices below are taken in the basis (e1,e2).

[F1]

The reflection ra is defined only for B(a,a)≠0; the radical is the set of u with B(u,v)=0 for every v, and the inertia of a form presented by a diagonal matrix with p positive, q negative and r zero diagonal entries is (p,q,r) (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space, Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form).

[F2]

A symmetric bilinear form is linear in each variable and satisfies B(u,v)=B(v,u) (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms).

[F4]

R is an ordered field, so the elementary arithmetic of the fractions below is the field arithmetic of R; in particular 2⋅12=1 and 23⋅3=2 (The reals form a totally ordered field).

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F4algebra

General reflection identities. Put d:=B(a,a)≠0. Bilinearity makes ra linear, gives B(ra(v),a)=−B(v,a), and hence ra2(v)=v. The formula gives ra(a)=−a and fixes every v with B(v,a)=0; conversely ra(v)=v forces B(v,a)=0, since a≠0 and 2/d≠0. Finally, symmetry and bilinearity give B(ra(u),ra(v))=B(u,v)−4B(u,a)B(v,a)/d+4B(u,a)B(v,a)/d=B(u,v). Thus the algebraic identities hold for every symmetric B, without requiring it to be a Coxeter form.

2.1givenF1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Positive plane. Take B the dot product, so B(e1,e1)=B(e2,e2)=1 and B(e1,e2)=0, and take a=35e1+45e2, for which B(a,a)=925+1625=1. Here B(e1,a)=35 and B(e2,a)=45, so ra(e1)=e1−65a=725e1−2425e2,ra(e2)=e2−85a=−2425e1−725e2, giving [ra]=125(7−24−24−7). Squaring, [ra]2=1625(62500625)=I2, and det⁡[ra]=−49−(−24)(−24)625=−625625=−1. The dot product has inertia (2,0,0) and ra fixes ker⁡B(−,a)={x:35x1+45x2=0}=R(−4e1+3e2) pointwise, the Euclidean reflection across that line.

2.2givenF1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Lorentzian plane. Take B(x,y)=x1y1−x2y2, of inertia (1,1,0), and a=2e1+e2, so B(a,a)=4−1=3, B(e1,a)=2 and B(e2,a)=−1. Then ra(e1)=e1−43a=−53e1−43e2,ra(e2)=e2+23a=43e1+53e2, so [ra]=13(−54−45), whose square is 19(9009)=I2 and whose determinant is −25+169=−1. The invariance identities hold on the basis: B(rae1,rae1)=259−169=1, B(rae2,rae2)=169−259=−1, and B(rae1,rae2)=−209+209=0, so [ra] preserves B by bilinearity.

2.3givenF1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Plane with radical. Take B(x,y)=x1y1, whose matrix diag⁡(1,0) has inertia (1,0,1) and whose radical is {u:u1v1=0 for all v}=Re2, and take a=e1, so B(a,a)=1 and ra(v)=v−2v1e1. Hence ra(e1)=−e1 and ra(e2)=e2, that is ra=diag⁡(−1,1), and its fixed hyperplane is ker⁡B(−,e1)={v:v1=0}=Re2=rad⁡(B). The vector e2 is B-null, B(e2,e2)=0, so the displayed formula assigns it no reflection.

3.1givenF1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3∎

Conclusion. In each of the three cases a satisfies B(a,a)≠0 and the displayed matrix is [ra] in the ordered basis (e1,e2): an involution with determinant −1 in the two nondegenerate cases, with the inertia readings (2,0,0) and (1,1,0) of the form and the fixed hyperplane ker⁡B(−,a) computed above, and in the degenerate case the fixed hyperplane coincides with the radical Re2. These explicit numbers verify the general identities proved in step 1.1 and display why the hypothesis B(a,a)≠0 of [F1] is exactly what the definition of ra requires: the null vector e2 of the last case is a normal for which no reflection is defined by the displayed formula.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources