How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chern classes of a sum of universal complex lines
Example
Assume AC and let be an integer. On let be the pullback of the universal complex line along the -th projection, let , and let . Then the -th elementary symmetric polynomial for , with , in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the projections and the pulled-back universal lines .
The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the Chern-class and Kunneth suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Chern classes are natural and multiplicative over Whitney sums, and on a line (Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes).
where , with free finitely generated homology in each degree, and the Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism for products of such spaces over a PID (Cohomology ring of infinite complex projective space, Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism).
Direct sums of complex line bundles are formed fiberwise and are compatible with pullback (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles).
The product of the standard circle classifying bundles models , with the coordinate universal lines (The universal complex flag bundle is BT-n).
The Schubert structures make a countable CW complex, with one cell in each even dimension: for rank one the symbols are the integers with cell dimension (Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure, Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).
Verification
The ordinary finite product base is a path-connected CW complex. To verify the topology qualification, exhaust two countable CW factors by increasing finite subcomplexes . Their product cells have finite closures. If is open in the product cell topology and , choose compact product neighborhoods in the first finite stages containing the point. Given , compactness of gives for each compact neighborhoods of and of in the next finite stages with . A finite collection of the interiors of covers ; take their union for and the intersection of the corresponding for . The unions of the relative interiors of and are open in the weak CW topologies: on each finite stage their tails are an increasing union of open sets. Their product lies in . Thus the ordinary product and cell topologies agree. Product characteristic maps give the CW structure (a product of two disks is a disk with its product boundary), and the resulting product still has countably many cells. Induction proves the assertion using [F5]. Path connectivity follows coordinatewise.
For , step 1.1 supplies the CW base. The coordinate universal circle bundles of [F4] are numerable; their associated complex lines and their pullbacks are numerable by pulling back the same local partitions. Thus the hypotheses of [F1] hold; a finite sum remains numerable by multiplying the finitely many local partition functions. Each is a complex line bundle and by [F3]; by multiplicativity and line normalization [F1], .
Each has cohomological degree two, so the degree- component of the product is . The empty product for is and the empty sum for is . Equivalently these are the coefficients of in the formal polynomial ; polynomial degree in is distinct from cohomological degree.
By naturality and line normalization in [F1], , for the specific generator of [F2]. Apply the Kunneth ring isomorphism repeatedly, taking one new factor each time: that factor has finite free integral homology in every degree, which suffices for the supplier even though the full cohomology is not finitely generated. The cross product sends its coordinate generators to the . Every generator has even degree, so all graded tensor signs are . This identifies the ring with , with no relations among the .
Boundary cases. For the base is a point, is the rank-zero bundle, the empty product is , and the ring is with no variables; [F1] gives exactly these Chern conventions. For the product is and ; for the elementary symmetric polynomial vanishes, matching the rank cutoff. If a line is replaced by a trivial summand, its first class is zero and its factor is by [F1]; this is a specialization, not a claim that one of the given universal coordinate lines is trivial. The coefficient ring is nonzero and the product is finite, so no convergence question arises. AC is used only through [A1].
Source notes
This is the elementary-symmetric computation of Miller's Lecture 35: the Chern classes of a sum of lines are the elementary symmetric functions of the line classes, which is also the mechanism behind .
The ordinary product topology in step 1.1 agrees with the product CW topology because each factor has countably many cells; see Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Appendix Theorem A.6, printed p.524: https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/AT.pdf .
Depends on
- Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes
- Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism
- Cohomology ring of infinite complex projective space
- Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles
- The Axiom of Choice
- The universal complex flag bundle is BT-n
- Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure
- Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Miller, MIT 18.906 Algebraic Topology II, Lecture 35 (standard reference, not scraped)