How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The complete graph has chromatic number
Example
For every , including , the complete graph satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The complete graph on the vertex set .
Every two distinct vertices of are adjacent (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
A proper colouring gives different colours to adjacent vertices, and is the least size of an available colour set (Proper vertex colourings and chromatic number).
Verification
In a proper colouring of , [L1] and [L2] force all vertices to receive distinct colours, so at least colours are required; this is also true at , where the assertion is vacuous.
The identity function is a proper -colouring because distinct vertices receive distinct values.
The lower bound in step 1.1 and the colouring in step 1.2 give .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Springer, Graph Theory Fundamentals, Section 1.7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)