Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Class group of Q(sqrt 10)

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For K=Q(10) the ideal class group is Cl⁡(OK)≅Z/2Z, generated by the class of the prime ideal p2=(2,10). The concrete content is: OK=Z[10], dK=40, the signature is (2,0) so that the Minkowski constant is MK=10<4, the ideals of norm 2 and 3 are exactly p2=(2,10), p3=(3,1+10) and p3′=(3,1−10), the products p22=(2), p3p3′=(3) and p2p3=(4+10) are principal, and p2 is not principal because a2−10b2=±2 has no integer solution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, K=Q(10) with OK=Z[10] and discriminant dK=40, and the element δ=10.

[F1]

For the squarefree integer d=10, which is not 1(mod4), the quadratic-field formulas give OK=Z[10] and dK=4⋅10=40 (Integers in a quadratic field, Discriminant of a quadratic field).

[F2]

Signature: r1 is the number of field embeddings K→R fixing Q and r2 is the number of complex-conjugate pairs among the nonreal field embeddings K→C fixing Q, with r1+2r2=[K:Q] (Archimedean embeddings and signature).

[F3]

Minkowski bound: every class of Cl⁡(OK) contains an integral ideal b with Nb≤MK (Minkowski bound for ideal classes, The ideal class group).

[F4]

For a nonzero integral ideal a, the absolute norm Na=∣OK/a∣ is a finite positive integer; for nonzero integral ideals N(ab)=Na Nb; and for 0≠β∈OK, N((β))=∣NK/Q(β)∣ (The absolute norm of an integral ideal, A nonzero number-field ideal has finite quotient, Ideal norm is multiplicative, The norm of a principal integral ideal).

[F5]

Field norm as a determinant: for β∈K the norm NK/Q(β) is the determinant of multiplication by β on the two-dimensional Q-vector space K (The norm NK/F and trace Tr⁡K/F of a finite field extension). In the basis 1,10 the matrix of multiplication by a+b10 is (a10bba), so NK/Q(a+b10)=a2−10b2.

[F6]

If a⊆b are nonzero integral ideals with Na=Nb, then a=b: the canonical surjection OK/a→OK/b identifies the finite group OK/b with a quotient of the finite group OK/a of the same order, and Lagrange's theorem leaves only the trivial quotient (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[F7]

Product of ideals: for two-sided ideals I,J, IJ={∑k=1mikjk:m≥0, ik∈I, jk∈J}, and for a subset S⊆R the ideal (S) is the intersection of all ideals containing S (The sum I+J and product IJ of two-sided ideals, The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

By [F1], OK=Z[δ] with dK=40. Every field embedding K→C fixing Q sends δ to a root of X2−10, that is, to ±δ, and both of these are real; so (r1,r2)=(2,0) with n=2 by [F2].

1.2F4F7construct

The map φ(a+bδ)=a mod 2 is a surjective ring homomorphism OK→F2: it is additive, and (a+bδ)(a′+b′δ)=(aa′+10bb′)+(ab′+a′b)δ maps to aa′+10bb′≡aa′=φ(a+bδ)φ(a′+b′δ)(mod2). Its kernel is {a+bδ:a≡0(mod2)}, which equals the ideal p2:=(2,δ): the products 2x+δy have even coefficient of 1, and conversely a+bδ=2⋅a2+bδ. Hence OK/p2≅F2 and Np2=2 by [F4].

1.3F4F7construct

Similarly ψ(a+bδ)=a−b mod 3 is a surjective ring homomorphism OK→F3: since 10≡1(mod3), it sends (a+bδ)(a′+b′δ) to aa′+bb′−ab′−a′b=(a−b)(a′−b′) modulo 3. Its kernel is {a+bδ:a≡b(mod3)}, which equals p3:=(3,1+δ) because a+bδ=3x+b(1+δ) when a=b+3x and conversely 3x+y(1+δ)=(3x+y)+yδ has congruent coefficients. So Np3=3. Likewise ψ′(a+bδ)=a+b mod 3 is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel {a+bδ:a≡−b(mod3)}=p3′:=(3,1−δ), so Np3′=3.

1.4F7algebra

p22=(2): by [F7] the square is generated by the products of the generators 2,δ, namely 4, 2δ and δ2=10, so p22=(4,2δ,10). All three generators are multiples of 2, giving p22⊆(2); conversely 2=10−2⋅4∈p22, so (2)⊆p22. Hence p22=(2).

1.5F7algebra

p3p3′=(3): by [F7] the product is generated by 9, 3(1−δ), 3(1+δ) and (1+δ)(1−δ)=1−10=−9, so p3p3′=3⋅(3,1−δ,1+δ). That second ideal contains (1−δ)+(1+δ)=2 and 3, hence contains 3−2=1, so it is OK and p3p3′=(3).

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Minkowski constant: by step 1.1 and [F1], MK=(4/π)02!2240=12⋅210=10<4, because 10<16.

2.2F4F6F7step 1.2step 1.3

Uniqueness: let b be an integral ideal with Nb=p∈{2,3}. Then OK/b has p elements, so its additive group is generated by 1 and it is isomorphic to Fp; the composite Z[X]→OK→Fp sends X to an element u with u2=10. For p=2 one has u2=0, so u=0, hence 2 and X lie in the kernel and the image of (2,X) is (2,δ)=p2⊆b; with Np2=2=Nb, step 1.2 and [F6] give b=p2. For p=3 one has u2=1, so u=±1: if u=1 then (3,δ−1)=(3,1−δ)=p3′⊆b and if u=−1 then (3,δ+1)=p3⊆b, so by step 1.3 and [F6] b is p3′ or p3.

2.3F7step 1.2

By [F7] the product p2p3 is generated by the products 6, 2(1+δ), 3δ and δ(1+δ)=10+δ; the identity 4+δ=(10+δ)−6 exhibits 4+δ in the product, so (4+δ)⊆p2p3.

2.4F4F5step 1.2algebra

p2 is not principal: if p2=(β) with β=a+bδ, then by [F4] and [F5], 2=Np2=N((β))=∣NK/Q(β)∣=∣a2−10b2∣, so a2−10b2=±2. Reducing modulo 5 gives a2≡±2(mod5), but the squares modulo 5 are 0,1,4 and neither 2 nor 3 occurs; this contradiction shows no such β exists.

3.1F4F5F6step 2.3step 1.2step 1.3algebra

Inclusion and equal norms force equality: by [F5] and [F4], N((4+δ))=∣16−10∣=6, while N(p2p3)=2⋅3=6 by steps 1.2 and 1.3; with (4+δ)⊆p2p3 from step 2.3, [F6] gives p2p3=(4+δ).

4.1F3step 1.4step 1.5step 3.1

Principal products are the identity class: step 1.4 gives [p2]2=[p22]=[(2)]=1, and step 3.1 gives [p2][p3]=[(4+δ)]=1, so [p3]=[p2]−1=[p2]; step 1.5 gives [p3][p3′]=[(3)]=1, so [p3′]=[p3]−1=[p2].

5.1step 4.1step 2.4

Hence [p2]2=1 by step 4.1 while [p2]≠1 by step 2.4, so [p2] has order exactly 2.

5.2F3F4step 2.1step 2.2step 4.1

By [F3] and step 2.1 every class of Cl⁡(OK) contains an integral ideal b with Nb≤10<4, and Nb is a positive integer by [F4], so Nb∈{1,2,3}. If Nb=1 then OK/b is trivial, that is b=OK; if Nb=2 then b=p2; and if Nb=3 then b is p3 or p3′, by step 2.2. By step 4.1 all of these ideals represent either the identity class or [p2].

6.1step 5.1step 5.2∎

Therefore every class of Cl⁡(OK) is 1 or [p2], so Cl⁡(OK)={1,[p2]}≅Z/2Z is generated by the class of p2=(2,10).

Remarks

The example is the real-quadratic counterpart of the computation for Q(−5): the ramified prime 2 gives p22=(2) with p2 nonprincipal, the split prime 3 gives two conjugate prime ideals whose product is (3), and the element 4+10 of norm 6 links the two, forcing [p3]=[p2]. Since r2=0 the Minkowski constant carries no factor 4/π and equals 10; the bound 10<4 leaves only the norms 1,2,3, and each of these norms has exactly the ideals listed.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources