Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Minkowski bound for ideal classes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let K be a number field of degree n and signature (r1,r2), and put

MK:=(4π)r2n!nn∣dK∣.

Then every class in the ideal class group Cl⁡(OK) (The ideal class group) contains an integral ideal b⊆OK with Nb≤MK.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a number field K, its ring of integers OK, and a class [I]∈Cl⁡(OK) represented by a nonzero fractional ideal I.

[F1]

Under the Axiom of Choice, OK is a Dedekind domain (Rings of integers are Dedekind domains).

[F2]

A fractional ideal of OK is a nonzero OK-submodule I⊆K for which some 0≠d∈OK satisfies dI⊆OK; its inverse is I−1=(OK:I), products and colons of fractional ideals are fractional ideals, and every nonzero fractional ideal of a Dedekind domain is invertible, so that II−1=OK and the nonzero fractional ideals form a group under multiplication (Fractional ideals, Products, colons, and inverse candidates for fractional ideals, The basic operations on fractional ideals are well defined, Invertible fractional ideals, Every nonzero fractional ideal of a Dedekind domain is invertible).

[F3]

Cl⁡(OK) is the quotient of the group of nonzero fractional ideals by the subgroup of nonzero principal fractional ideals, and multiplication descends to the quotient (The ideal class group, The ideal class group quotient is well defined).

[F4]

Small nonzero element in an integral ideal: for every nonzero integral ideal c⊆OK there is 0≠β∈c with ∣NK/Q(β)∣≤MK Nc (Small nonzero element in a number-field ideal).

[F5]

For 0≠α∈OK the principal ideal (α) satisfies N((α))=∣NK/Q(α)∣, and for nonzero integral ideals a,b one has N(ab)=Na Nb (The norm of a principal integral ideal, Ideal norm is multiplicative).

[F6]

(α)⊆c exactly when α∈c (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3given

By [F1] the ring OK is Dedekind, so the fractional ideals and the class group of [F2] and [F3] are available, and the class [I] has a nonzero fractional representative I.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

By the denominator condition in [F2] applied to the fractional ideal I−1, there is 0≠u∈OK with b:=uI−1⊆OK; b is a nonzero integral ideal, and [b]=[I]−1 in Cl⁡(OK) because u contributes the principal class.

3.1F4step 2.1

Applying [F4] to the nonzero integral ideal b gives 0≠β∈b with ∣NK/Q(β)∣≤MK Nb.

4.1F2F6step 3.1

By [F6] the membership β∈b says (β)⊆b; multiplying this inclusion by the fractional ideal b−1 and using bb−1=OK from [F2] gives a:=(β)b−1⊆OK, a nonzero integral ideal because (β)≠0 and b−1≠0.

5.1F3step 2.1step 4.1

In the class group, [a]=[(β)] [b]−1=[b]−1=[I], since the principal fractional ideal (β) represents the identity class.

5.2F5step 3.1step 4.1algebra

From a=(β)b−1 we get the identity of integral ideals ab=(β); both factors are nonzero integral ideals, so [F5] gives Na Nb=N((β))=∣NK/Q(β)∣≤MK Nb, and dividing by the positive integer Nb yields Na≤MK.

6.1step 5.1step 5.2∎

Thus the integral ideal a lies in the class [I] and satisfies Na≤MK; since the class was arbitrary, every class of Cl⁡(OK) contains such an ideal.

Remarks

The preliminary denominator u is what makes the argument work without a norm theory for fractional ideals: it converts I−1 into an integral ideal, the small-element theorem is applied there, and the factor (β) then produces the integral representative a=(β)b−1 in the class [I]. The class direction is [a]=[b]−1=[I], not [I]−1. Because MK depends only on the signature and discriminant, the theorem bounds every class by one numerical constant; this is the input to both the finiteness of the class group and the generation by small prime ideals.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources