How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Minkowski bound for ideal classes
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a number field of degree and signature , and put
Then every class in the ideal class group (The ideal class group) contains an integral ideal with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a number field , its ring of integers , and a class represented by a nonzero fractional ideal .
Under the Axiom of Choice, is a Dedekind domain (Rings of integers are Dedekind domains).
A fractional ideal of is a nonzero -submodule for which some satisfies ; its inverse is , products and colons of fractional ideals are fractional ideals, and every nonzero fractional ideal of a Dedekind domain is invertible, so that and the nonzero fractional ideals form a group under multiplication (Fractional ideals, Products, colons, and inverse candidates for fractional ideals, The basic operations on fractional ideals are well defined, Invertible fractional ideals, Every nonzero fractional ideal of a Dedekind domain is invertible).
is the quotient of the group of nonzero fractional ideals by the subgroup of nonzero principal fractional ideals, and multiplication descends to the quotient (The ideal class group, The ideal class group quotient is well defined).
Small nonzero element in an integral ideal: for every nonzero integral ideal there is with (Small nonzero element in a number-field ideal).
For the principal ideal satisfies , and for nonzero integral ideals one has (The norm of a principal integral ideal, Ideal norm is multiplicative).
exactly when (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).
Proof
By [F1] the ring is Dedekind, so the fractional ideals and the class group of [F2] and [F3] are available, and the class has a nonzero fractional representative .
By the denominator condition in [F2] applied to the fractional ideal , there is with ; is a nonzero integral ideal, and in because contributes the principal class.
Applying [F4] to the nonzero integral ideal gives with .
By [F6] the membership says ; multiplying this inclusion by the fractional ideal and using from [F2] gives , a nonzero integral ideal because and .
In the class group, , since the principal fractional ideal represents the identity class.
From we get the identity of integral ideals ; both factors are nonzero integral ideals, so [F5] gives , and dividing by the positive integer yields .
Thus the integral ideal lies in the class and satisfies ; since the class was arbitrary, every class of contains such an ideal.
Remarks
The preliminary denominator is what makes the argument work without a norm theory for fractional ideals: it converts into an integral ideal, the small-element theorem is applied there, and the factor then produces the integral representative in the class . The class direction is , not . Because depends only on the signature and discriminant, the theorem bounds every class by one numerical constant; this is the input to both the finiteness of the class group and the generation by small prime ideals.
Depends on
- Small nonzero element in a number-field ideal
- Rings of integers are Dedekind domains
- The ideal class group
- The ideal class group quotient is well defined
- Every nonzero fractional ideal of a Dedekind domain is invertible
- Invertible fractional ideals
- Products, colons, and inverse candidates for fractional ideals
- The basic operations on fractional ideals are well defined
- Fractional ideals
- The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals
- Ideal norm is multiplicative
- The norm of a principal integral ideal
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Class group generated by small prime ideals Corollary
- Nontrivial number fields have discriminant of absolute value greater than one Corollary
- Class group of Q(sqrt -5) Example
- Class group of Q(sqrt 10) Example
- Higher-degree class group by norm exclusions Example
- Minkowski bound for Gaussian integers Example
- Signature constant rules out discriminant ±1 Example
- Finiteness of the number-field class group Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory v3.08 (standard reference, not scraped)
- William A. Stein, Algebraic Number Theory: A Computational Approach (standard reference, not scraped)