Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finitely many ideals of bounded norm

Statement

Let K be a number field and let B≥1 be real. Then only finitely many nonzero integral ideals a⊆OK satisfy Na≤B.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A number field K with ring of integers OK, a real number B≥1, and an integer n=[K:Q].

[F1]

For every nonzero integral ideal a⊆OK the absolute norm Na=∣OK/a∣ is a finite cardinal (The absolute norm of an integral ideal, A nonzero number-field ideal has finite quotient).

[F2]

OK is a free Z-module of rank n (The ring of integers has rank the degree).

[F3]

If G is a finite group and H≤G then ∣G∣=[G:H] ∣H∣ (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G); hence the order of every element of G divides ∣G∣, because the cyclic subgroup it generates has that order.

Proof

1.1F1F3given

Let a be a nonzero integral ideal with Na=m; by [F1] the additive group OK/a has exactly m elements, so by [F3] the order of each of its elements divides m, and for x∈OK this gives m(x+a)=a, that is mx∈a, so mOK⊆a.

1.2F2algebra

Fix a Z-basis e1,…,en of OK, which exists by [F2]; every class of OK/mOK has exactly one representative ∑iaiei with 0≤ai<m, because subtracting suitable multiples of m from the coordinates gives existence, while ∑ibiei∈mOK with ∣bi∣<m for all i forces each bi to be an integer multiple of m, hence bi=0, giving uniqueness; thus ∣OK/mOK∣=mn.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Conversely every nonzero integral ideal a with mOK⊆a has image a/mOK an ideal of the quotient ring OK/mOK, and distinct ideals a,b containing mOK have distinct images: if a/mOK=b/mOK and x∈a, then x+mOK∈b/mOK, so x∈b+mOK⊆b, and interchanging a and b gives equality.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2algebra

A finite ring has only finitely many ideals, since its underlying set has only finitely many subsets, so for each fixed m there are finitely many nonzero integral ideals with Na=m by steps 2.1 and 1.2.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

A nonzero integral ideal of norm ≤B has norm equal to one of the positive integers m≤B, of which there are only the finitely many values 1≤m≤⌊B⌋, and a finite union of finite sets is finite, so only finitely many nonzero integral ideals satisfy Na≤B.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources