How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Small nonzero element in a number-field ideal
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a number field of degree and signature , and let be a nonzero integral ideal with absolute norm . Then there is with
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A number field of degree and signature , so , with ring of integers and nonzero integral ideal of absolute norm (Unscaled Minkowski embedding).
Minkowski convex-body theorem at equality: under the Axiom of Choice, if is compact, convex and centrally symmetric and for a full lattice , then contains a nonzero point of (Minkowski convex-body theorem at equality, Full Euclidean lattice and covolume).
For the set is compact, convex and centrally symmetric, has , and every point of satisfies (Archimedean product region, volume and norm bound).
For a nonzero integral ideal the image under the unscaled Minkowski embedding is a full lattice in with (Number-field integer rings and ideals are full lattices, Covolume of an integral ideal lattice).
For the norm is , so (Norm and trace from embeddings, with the inseparable exponent in the norm formula).
Proof
Put , a positive real number, and let be the region of [F2].
By [F2] the set is compact, convex and centrally symmetric.
By [F2] and [F3], , using .
Applying [F1] to the compact convex centrally symmetric set and the full lattice of positive covolume, whose volume equals by step 2.2, gives a nonzero with .
Since , the product bound of [F2] reads , and by [F4] the left side is .
Therefore , and .
Remarks
The choice of makes the volume of exactly times the covolume, which is why the equality form of Minkowski's theorem is needed and produces the constant rather than a strict inequality. The factor is the ratio between the volume of the region of [F2] and the covariantly normalized volume, and it carries the unscaled real/imaginary convention. Passing to a fractional ideal requires multiplying by a denominator first, as recorded on the covolume theorem.
Depends on
- Minkowski convex-body theorem at equality
- Covolume of an integral ideal lattice
- Archimedean product region, volume and norm bound
- Norm and trace from embeddings, with the inseparable exponent in the norm formula
- Number-field integer rings and ideals are full lattices
- Unscaled Minkowski embedding
- Full Euclidean lattice and covolume
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory v3.08 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad and Aaron Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory (standard reference, not scraped)