How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coarse and fine Euler paths coupled by a bridge split
Example
Assume AC as in the Gaussian and Brownian interfaces.
For the scalar SDE on one interval of length , let and independently . Couple the two fine increments by the Brownian bridge split and . From initial value , one coarse Euler step and two fine Euler steps give and hence For , the coupled difference is centered with variance .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the Euler update for , , the parent , and the independent midpoint innovation .
A scalar Euler–Maruyama step is on an interval of length . Euler–Maruyama recursion
The bridge children are and with a fresh independent . Dyadic Brownian bridge increment tree
The children have the exact joint independent law and sum to the parent. Exact increment laws in the dyadic Brownian bridge tree
AC is inherited through the Euler, Gaussian, and bridge-sampling interfaces; the finite update calculation makes no further selection. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Applying [F1] once with and gives .
Applying [F1] on the first fine half-step gives . The second half-step gives , so substitution yields the displayed fine formula.
Substitute [F2] into and subtract from step 1.1: For , independence and the variances in [F2] give . The identity makes this a path-consistent coupling, not two independent simulations.
The case is excluded; for every the fine difference has strictly positive variance at . A nonzero initial value changes the mean by but not that variance. This example checks an exact finite-dimensional coupling only; it is not a general MLMC or convergence rate theorem.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Simo Särkkä and Arno Solin, Applied Stochastic Differential Equations, Algorithm 8.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mike Giles, Monte Carlo Methods, Module 4: Monte Carlo path simulation, Brownian bridge, pp. 27–30 (standard reference, not scraped)