How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Euler–Maruyama recursion
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice and use the finite-dimensional Brownian-motion convention of -dimensional Brownian motion. Let the state dimension and noise dimension be positive finite integers, and fix and with . Set and for . Let and be jointly Borel. Write for the Euclidean norm and for the Frobenius norm. Suppose finite constants satisfy, for every and , and Let be an adapted standard -dimensional Brownian motion on a filtered probability space, with independent of and law whenever . Let be -measurable, independent of future Brownian increments, and .
The Euler–Maruyama algorithm takes these data as input and returns :
- Set .
- For , form and set
The output is the grid approximation for the coefficient pair . The companion step-process and interpolation definition uses this same grid and endpoint convention.
Remarks
This algorithm defines finite-dimensional recursions. Its definition alone does not assert a convergence rate, density regularity, or a path-supremum moment bound.
Depends on
Used by
- Euler–Maruyama on a predictable grid with bridge-refinement status Algorithm
- Euler–Maruyama step process and continuous interpolation Definition
- A learned-drift bias that persists after solver error vanishes Example
- A superlinear drift outside the Euler–Maruyama moment contract Example
- Coarse and fine Euler paths coupled by a bridge split Example
- Euler–Maruyama for a constant-coefficient additive-noise equation Example
- Euler–Maruyama one-step moment and increment estimates Lemma
- Uniform second moment for Euler–Maruyama on predictable grids Lemma
- Euler–Maruyama uniform moments and interpolation increments Theorem
- Euler–Maruyama weak order one under backward regularity Theorem
- Strong error bound for Euler–Maruyama on a predictable grid Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Simo Särkkä and Arno Solin, Applied Stochastic Differential Equations, Algorithm 8.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Desmond J. Higham, Xuerong Mao, and Andrew M. Stuart, Strong Convergence of Euler-Type Methods for Nonlinear Stochastic Differential Equations, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tiejun Li, Lecture 16: Numerical SDEs: Basics, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)