Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A square-integrable predictable step Itô integral is its finite sum

Statement

Assume AC. Fix T>0 and a finite partition 0=t0<t1<⋯<tN=T. Let W be a scalar Brownian motion adapted to (Ft), with Wt−Ws independent of Fs and distributed as N(0,t−s) for every 0≤s<t≤T. If each ξk is real-valued, Ftk-measurable and square-integrable, then the predictable step process Hs=∑k=0N−1ξk1(tk,tk+1](s) is square-integrable. Every continuous version of its Itô integral agrees, at every time on one measurable event of probability one, with St=∑k=0N−1ξk(Wt∧tk+1−Wt∧tk),0≤t≤T. If the probability space is complete, this agreement is indistinguishability. The coefficients need not be bounded.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, T>0, a finite partition 0=t0<t1<⋯<tN=T, a scalar Brownian motion adapted to (Ft) whose every future increment is independent of the current filtration, and square-integrable Ftk-measurable coefficients ξk.

[F1]

d-dimensional Brownian motion: increments over a positive time interval have the corresponding centered normal law.

[F12]

d-dimensional Brownian motion: Brownian paths are continuous on one common measurable event of probability one.

[F2]

Progressively measurable and predictable processes: the predictable sigma-algebra is generated by time-zero sets and rectangles (s,t]×A with A∈Fs; a process is predictable when its time-sample map is measurable for that sigma-algebra.

[F3]

Elementary predictable Brownian integrands: a bounded finite step process with coefficients measurable at the left endpoints is elementary predictable, and changing values at finitely many deterministic times does not change its dt⊗P class.

[F4]

Ito integral of an elementary predictable process: the elementary integral at time t is ∑kξk(Wt∧tk+1−Wt∧tk).

[F5]

Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes: the general integral is the L2(P) limit of elementary integrals approximating the predictable integrand in L2(dt⊗P), with truncation to [0,t] for its value at time t.

[F6]

The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version: every finite-energy predictable Itô integrand has an adapted continuous integral version, unique among continuous versions on one measurable probability-one event.

[F7]

Monotone convergence for the integral: expectations of increasing nonnegative sequences converge to the expectation of their pointwise limit.

[F8]

The rationals embed densely in the reals: rational times, together with the endpoint T, are dense in [0,T].

[F9]

Progressively measurable and predictable processes: the deterministic indicators 1[0,u] and 1(0,u] are predictable for every deterministic u≥0.

[F10]

The Lp norm descends to the quotient and makes Lp a normed space for 1≤p≤∞: the L2(P) quotient norm satisfies the triangle inequality and separates equivalence classes.

[F11]

Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance: N1(0,δ) has mean zero and variance, hence second moment, equal to δ.

[A1]

For every 0≤s<t≤T, Wt−Ws is independent of Fs. This filtration-relative independence is an explicit hypothesis, not a consequence of the pathwise Brownian definition alone.

[A2]

AC is inherited from the Brownian and Itô-integral interfaces above; the truncation and finite-sum argument makes no additional choice. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

For every Borel set C⊆R, H−1(C) is the finite union of the predictable rectangles (tk,tk+1]×{ξk∈C}, together with {0}×Ω when 0∈C; hence [F2] makes H predictable. The intervals partition (0,T], and [F3] makes the time-zero endpoint irrelevant to the product integral, so E∫0THs2ds=∑k=0N−1(tk+1−tk)E∣ξk∣2<∞.

1.2F3F7givenalgebra

For n≥1, clip each coefficient by ξk,n=(−n)∨(ξk∧n) and put Hsn=∑kξk,n1(tk,tk+1](s). Each Hn is bounded and elementary by [F3]. Since ∣ξk,n−ξk∣2≤∣ξk∣21{∣ξk∣>n} and E∣ξk∣2<∞, [F7] applied to ∣ξk∣21{∣ξk∣≤n}↑∣ξk∣2 gives E∣ξk,n−ξk∣2→0. The finite partition then gives ∥Hn−H∥L2(dt⊗P)2=∑k(tk+1−tk)E∣ξk,n−ξk∣2→0.

2.1F4F5step 1.2given

For each fixed t∈[0,T], [F5] defines ∫0tHs dWs as an L2(P) limit of the elementary integrals of Hn1[0,t]. By [F4] those approximants are Stn=∑kξk,n(Wt∧tk+1−Wt∧tk). Hence Stn→∫0tHs dWs in L2(P).

3.1A1F1F10F11step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Put δk(t)=(t∧tk+1)−(t∧tk)≥0. When δk(t)=0 the increment in the kth summand vanishes. When δk(t)>0, [F1] gives its N(0,δk(t)) law, [F11] gives second moment δk(t), and [A1] makes it independent of ξk,n−ξk. Thus the L2 norm of that summand's difference between Stn and St is δk(t) ∥ξk,n−ξk∥2. The triangle inequality [F10] and the finite number of intervals imply Stn→St in L2(P). Since also Stn→∫0tHs dWs by step 2.1, the triangle inequality gives ∥St−∫0tHs dWs∥2=0, and separation [F10] makes these classes equal almost surely.

4.1A2F6F8F9F12step 3.1algebra∎

Extend H by zero after T; [F9] makes this extension predictable and its energy stays finite on every finite horizon. The process S has continuous paths on the common Brownian continuity event [F12], because it is a finite sum of fixed random coefficients times stopped Brownian increments. Let M be the continuous integral version supplied by [F6]. Step 3.1 gives Mt=St almost surely at each t in the countable dense set of [F8]; intersecting those measurable probability-one events with the continuity events and using continuity gives equality for every t∈[0,T] on one measurable probability-one event. If the probability space is complete, the complement of the full equality set is a subset of the measurable null complement of this event, hence is measurable and null; the versions are then indistinguishable. AC is inherited through [F6] as recorded in [A2].

Source notes

Van der Vaart, §5.3, Definitions 5.20 and 5.25 and Lemmas 5.21–5.23, constructs the square-integrable integral by continuous extension from bounded simple predictable integrands. The proof above supplies the finite-partition truncation and common continuous-version argument for the exact step processes used by Euler–Maruyama.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources