Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rephasing the trivial projective representation of C2 by a coboundary

Example

Let Q=C2={1,t} and let P be the trivial one-dimensional projective representation P(1)=P(t)=1 on V=C, with factor set α≡1. Rephasing by the function c(1)=1, c(t)=i gives Pc(1)=1, Pc(t)=i with Pc(t)Pc(t)=i2=−1=αc(t,t)Pc(1), so αc(t,t)=−1 and αc=δc: the rephased factor set is the coboundary of c, and both factor sets represent the zero class of H2(C2,C×). Multiplying Pc(t) by c(t)−1=−i returns the genuine representation P.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The group Q=C2={1,t} with t2=1, the one-dimensional space V=C, the trivial projective representation P(1)=P(t)=1, and the function c:Q→C× with c(1)=1, c(t)=i.

[F1]

For c:Q→C× with c(1)=1, the rephasing Pc(q)=c(q)P(q) has factor set αc(q,r)=c(q)c(r)c(qr)−1α(q,r), hence the same cohomology class as α. (Rephasing changes factor sets by coboundaries).

[F2]

A normalized projective representation of Q on a nonzero finite-dimensional space is a map P with P(1)=id⁡ and P(q)P(r)=α(q,r)P(qr) for a factor set α:Q×Q→C×, which is determined by P. (Projective representations and normalized factor sets).

[F3]

The Clifford obstruction of an invariant irreducible normal-subgroup type is the class in H2(Q,C×) of the factor set of its normalized projective operators, and it is unchanged by rephasing; a class vanishes exactly when the cocycle is a coboundary. (The Clifford obstruction class of an invariant irreducible representation).

[A1]

For scalars z,w∈C× one has zw=wz, i2=−1 and (−i)⋅i=1.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The map P with P(1)=P(t)=1 is a normalized projective representation with factor set α≡1: P(1)=id⁡V and, since t2=1 and V is one-dimensional, P(q)P(r)=1=α(q,r)P(qr) for all four pairs (q,r)∈Q×Q with α(q,r)=1.

F2givenalgebra
2.1

Rephasing by c gives Pc(1)=c(1)P(1)=1 and Pc(t)=c(t)P(t)=i, so Pc is again normalized; and Pc(t)Pc(t)=i⋅i=−1, while the defining relation for Pc at the pair (t,t) reads Pc(t)Pc(t)=αc(t,t)Pc(t2)=αc(t,t)Pc(1)=αc(t,t), so αc(t,t)=−1; the pairs involving 1 have αc(1,q)=αc(q,1)=1, so αc is the function with the single nontrivial value αc(t,t)=−1 and αc≢1.

A1step 1.1givenalgebra
3.1

The rephasing formula of [F1] reproduces this value: αc(t,t)=c(t)c(t)c(t2)−1α(t,t)=i⋅i⋅c(1)−1⋅1=−1, using c(1)=1 and α≡1; so αc=δc in the multiplicative coboundary notation, with δc(t,t)=−1 and δc=1 on the pairs involving the identity.

A1F1step 2.1algebra
3.2

Rephasing is reversible and returns the genuine representation: with c′(q):=c(q)−1, so that c′(1)=1 and c′(t)=−i, the rephased family Pc′(q)=c′(q)Pc(q) has Pc′(1)=1 and Pc′(t)=(−i)⋅i=1=P(t); by [F1] its factor set is δc′⋅αc=1, so it is the original multiplicative representation P of step 1.1.

A1F1step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Both factor sets therefore have the same class in H2(C2,C×), namely the zero class: α≡1 is the identity cocycle, and αc=δc is a coboundary, so [αc]=[α]=0 by [F3]. To realize this as a Clifford obstruction, take G=C2, N={1} and the unique irreducible representation ρ of N on C. It is G-invariant, with inertia group G and quotient G/N=C2. Both P and Pc restrict to ρ, and P(ng)=ρ(n)P(g) and P(gn)=P(g)ρ(n) (and the same identities for Pc) hold since n=1. Thus they are projective inertia operators for this specified type in [F3]. Their factor sets give its same vanishing obstruction, although αc is not the constant cocycle.

F1F3step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

The example is verified: the trivial one-dimensional projective representation of C2={1,t} has α≡1; rephasing by c(1)=1, c(t)=i produces Pc(t)=i with αc(t,t)=−1, which is exactly δc(t,t)=c(t)c(t)c(t2)−1; and since δc is a coboundary, the two factor sets lie in one cohomology class, the zero class, which step 3.2 confirms by rephasing back to P with multiplier −i.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources