How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Clifford obstruction class of an invariant irreducible representation
Definition
Let be finite groups, let be an irreducible representation on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex space , let be its character, let be the inertia group (Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type), and put . By An invariant irreducible normal representation yields projective inertia operators there are operators with , , and , where is a normalized two-cocycle on with values in the abelian group (trivial -action, written multiplicatively). The Clifford obstruction of (equivalently, of ) is the cohomology class in the factor-set model of Second cohomology by factor sets. The class vanishes precisely when the projective operators can be made multiplicative, which by An invariant irreducible representation extends to its inertia group exactly when the Clifford obstruction vanishes is exactly the extendibility of to ; in particular the class is a complete obstruction to extension, not merely a necessary condition.
The class does not depend on the operators. If is a second family with the same normalization and the same three identities, then by An invariant irreducible normal representation yields projective inertia operators there is a function with and for all , and the factor set of is . Read as a one-cochain on with the trivial action, has coboundary and , so and have the same class in ; this is the rephasing computation of Rephasing changes factor sets by coboundaries, applied to the projective representation of afforded by , and it is the step that makes the class depend only on the character triple.
Equivalent representations give the same class. If for a linear isomorphism , then the operators satisfy the same identities with the same function , because and all scalar identities are unchanged by conjugation. So replacing by an equivalent representation, possibly on another space, leaves the class literally unchanged; note that and are unchanged as well.
Degenerate case . Here is the trivial group, whose only normalized two-cocycle is the constant function , so is the trivial group and the Clifford obstruction is automatically zero. This is the trivial case of the extension criterion: is already a representation of , and indeed the identity map is an extension. The first interesting case is therefore a proper invariant type, and the class measures exactly how far the associated projective operators are from an extension.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Britta Späth, Reduction theorems for some global-local conjectures — §1.B (character triples, associated projective representations, Lemma 1.8(d)), printed pp. 3–4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — §4.2, printed pp. 54–57 (standard reference, not scraped)