How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An invariant irreducible normal representation yields projective inertia operators
Statement
Let be finite groups, let be an irreducible representation on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex space , let be its character, and let be the inertia group. Then there are operators , , with and and there is a normalized two-cocycle on , in the multiplicative convention of Normalized two-cocycle and two-coboundary, such that Thus is a normalized projective representation of whose factor set descends to . Every second family with the same normalization and the same three identities satisfies for a function with , and the factor set of is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite groups , an irreducible finite-dimensional complex representation with , its character , the inertia group , and a left transversal for the cosets of in with .
and , and the stabilizer satisfies . (Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type).
The conjugate representation of a representation of is the same space regarded as a representation of by , and for its character. (Conjugate representations and conjugate characters on conjugate subgroups).
Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are isomorphic if and only if they have the same character. (Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are determined up to isomorphism by their characters).
Every endomorphism of an irreducible representation over an algebraically closed field is a scalar operator. (Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar).
The factor set of a normalized projective representation satisfies and . (The factor set satisfies the two-cocycle equation).
A normalized two-cocycle on a group with values in the abelian group written multiplicatively and with trivial action is a function with and for all . (Normalized two-cocycle and two-coboundary).
Since , left and right cosets coincide, so every has a unique expression and a unique expression with and ; explicitly is the transversal element with , and .
Proof
For the conjugate is a representation of whose character is by [F1] and [F2]; hence by [F3]. Choose with for every , and set , which satisfies this relation.
By [A1] write each as with , , and set . This is well defined because the pair is unique, and , while for ; each is invertible, with .
For and one has and . Indeed and are the decompositions of [A1], so , and using the intertwining relation of step 1.1.
For every and one has . Indeed , using and step 1.1.
For the operator is invertible and satisfies for every , by step 3.2 applied to , and ; since is irreducible over the algebraically closed field , [F4] gives a unique with , the scalar being nonzero because is invertible, so for all .
The scalar of step 4.1 depends only on the cosets and : the general element of is and the general element of is with , so it suffices to compare and with . For the first, with , so by step 3.1 and by step 3.2, whence . For the second, and with , so and by step 3.1, while by step 3.2, hence , the last equality because is a scalar.
Write , which is well defined by step 5.1, so that for all ; and for every , since and with by step 2.1 force .
The function is a normalized two-cocycle on in the sense of [F6]: the normalization is step 6.1, and associativity of composition in gives , while is invertible by step 2.1, so ; passing to cosets, this is the cocycle identity of [F6] on .
Now let be a second family with the same normalization and the same three identities. For each , the operator commutes with : by step 3.2, which applies to by the same computation, , hence for all . By [F4] there is a unique with , so . Step 3.1 for both families gives for , so is constant on both left and right -cosets and defines , and because . Finally , so the factor set of is .
Steps 2.1, 3.1, 6.1 and 7.1 produce operators with , , , and for the normalized two-cocycle on . Composing with the coset projection therefore expresses as a normalized projective representation of in the sense of [F5] whose factor set is carried by , and step 7.2 shows that every other normalized family differs from by a -valued cochain on with .
Depends on
- Projective representations and normalized factor sets
- The factor set satisfies the two-cocycle equation
- Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type
- Conjugate representations and conjugate characters on conjugate subgroups
- Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar
- Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are determined up to isomorphism by their characters
- Normalized two-cocycle and two-coboundary
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Britta Späth, Reduction theorems for some global-local conjectures — Definition 1.4, Lemma 1.8(a)–(d), printed pp. 2–4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — §4.2, printed pp. 54–57 (standard reference, not scraped)