How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Communicating classes in a four-state chain
Example
On take the transition matrix, with rows and columns in this order, to be
Its communicating classes are , , and . States are recurrent, while state is transient.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The four-state transition matrix displayed above and, for each initial state , its deterministic-start chain law .
The -step transition probability is , with . (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)
Accessibility means iff for some , and communication means mutual accessibility. (Accessibility, communication, and irreducibility)
Communication is an equivalence relation, and its equivalence classes partition the state space. (Communication is an equivalence relation)
The matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov identity is . (Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov equations)
The positive return time is . (Hitting, return, and visit times)
State is recurrent when . (Recurrent and transient states)
State is transient when . (Recurrent and transient states)
Proof
The four displayed rows are nonnegative and each sums to one. Because is a transition matrix, every unlisted entry in each row must therefore be zero; the matrix is fully specified as displayed.
By induction using [F4], for every the row is concentrated at , while the rows from and alternate deterministically between those two states. Thus reaches neither , and reach neither nor . Since , states communicate. State communicates with itself, and it reaches , but cannot reach ; its rows also show it reaches neither nor . Hence the communication classes are exactly , , and .
From state the chain stays at , so almost surely. From states and it alternates deterministically, so almost surely. In all three cases the positive return probability is one, so are recurrent by [F6].
From state , the first step is a return to with probability . With the remaining probability the chain moves to and then stays there forever, so there is no later return to . Therefore , and state is transient by [F7].
The example fixes a four-state space, so the empty-space and one-state cases do not arise. Zero entries are forced by row normalization and are used in the access calculation; the deterministic rows and absorbing state are covered directly. Accessibility includes the zero-step identity, whereas starts at time one. All calculations are finite and choice-free. This example gives a state classification, not an iff theorem.
Source notes
LPW, §1.7, printed pp. 15–16 (PDF pp. 31–32), defines finite-state accessibility and communicating classes and treats communication as an equivalence relation. Durrett, §5.3, Example 5.3.4, printed pp. 283–284 (PDF pp. 291–292), works through a different seven-state chain using its positive transition graph and recurrence arguments. These passages support the classification method but do not state this four-state matrix or its calculation; those are derived directly above. The cited LPW section is finite state, matching this example's domain.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Levin, Peres and Wilmer, Markov Chains and Mixing Times, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)