Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Communicating classes in a four-state chain

Example

On E={0,1,2,3} take the transition matrix, with rows and columns in this order, to be

P=(100000100100120012).

Its communicating classes are {0}, {1,2}, and {3}. States 0,1,2 are recurrent, while state 3 is transient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The four-state transition matrix displayed above and, for each initial state x, its deterministic-start chain law Px.

[F1]

The n-step transition probability is p(n)(x,y)=Kn(x,{y}), with p(0)(x,y)=1{x=y}. (Transition matrices and n-step probabilities)

[F2]

Accessibility means x→y iff p(n)(x,y)>0 for some n∈N0, and communication means mutual accessibility. (Accessibility, communication, and irreducibility)

[F3]

Communication is an equivalence relation, and its equivalence classes partition the state space. (Communication is an equivalence relation)

[F4]

The matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov identity is p(m+n)(x,y)=∑z∈Ep(m)(x,z)p(n)(z,y). (Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov equations)

[F5]

The positive return time is Tx+=inf⁡{n≥1:Xn=x}. (Hitting, return, and visit times)

[F6]

State x is recurrent when Px(Tx+<∞)=1. (Recurrent and transient states)

[F7]

State x is transient when Px(Tx+<∞)<1. (Recurrent and transient states)

Proof

technique · compute the finite transition graph and return events
1.1given

The four displayed rows are nonnegative and each sums to one. Because P is a transition matrix, every unlisted entry in each row must therefore be zero; the matrix is fully specified as displayed.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1given

By induction using [F4], for every n≥0 the row p(n)(0,⋅) is concentrated at 0, while the rows from 1 and 2 alternate deterministically between those two states. Thus 0 reaches neither 1,2,3, and 1,2 reach neither 0 nor 3. Since p(1,2)=p(2,1)=1, states 1,2 communicate. State 3 communicates with itself, and it reaches 0, but 0 cannot reach 3; its rows also show it reaches neither 1 nor 2. Hence the communication classes are exactly {0}, {1,2}, and {3}.

2.2F5F6step 1.1given

From state 0 the chain stays at 0, so T0+=1 almost surely. From states 1 and 2 it alternates deterministically, so T1+=T2+=2 almost surely. In all three cases the positive return probability is one, so 0,1,2 are recurrent by [F6].

2.3F5F7step 1.1given

From state 3, the first step is a return to 3 with probability p(3,3)=1/2. With the remaining probability 1/2 the chain moves to 0 and then stays there forever, so there is no later return to 3. Therefore P3(T3+<∞)=1/2<1, and state 3 is transient by [F7].

3.1F1F2F5step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3given∎

The example fixes a four-state space, so the empty-space and one-state cases do not arise. Zero entries are forced by row normalization and are used in the access calculation; the deterministic rows and absorbing state are covered directly. Accessibility includes the zero-step identity, whereas Tx+ starts at time one. All calculations are finite and choice-free. This example gives a state classification, not an iff theorem.

Source notes

LPW, §1.7, printed pp. 15–16 (PDF pp. 31–32), defines finite-state accessibility and communicating classes and treats communication as an equivalence relation. Durrett, §5.3, Example 5.3.4, printed pp. 283–284 (PDF pp. 291–292), works through a different seven-state chain using its positive transition graph and recurrence arguments. These passages support the classification method but do not state this four-state matrix or its calculation; those are derived directly above. The cited LPW section is finite state, matching this example's domain.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources