Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex K-AHSS for spheres

Example

Assume AC. For n>0 the reduced complex K-groups of the sphere are K~0(Sn)≅{Z,n even,0,n odd,K~1(Sn)≅{0,n even,Z,n odd, and the sphere K-AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. For a finite CW complex the K-AHSS has E2p,q=Hp(X;Z) for even q, zero for odd q, and dr:Erp,q→Erp+r,q−r+1 (Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A2]

The coefficient groups of complex K-theory are Bott-periodic: K2k(∗)≅Z and K2k+1(∗)=0, with all Kq(∗) obtained by shifting K0(∗)=Z (Complex Bott periodicity, Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A3]

For n>0, H0(Sn;Z)≅Hn(Sn;Z)≅Z, and all other reduced cohomology groups of the sphere vanish; hence the K-AHSS of Sn is supported in the two columns p=0 and p=n (Complex K-theory of spheres and the universal coefficient comparison of Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A4]

The published sphere computation gives K~0(S2m)≅Z and K~0(S2m+1)=0, with K1 of the opposite parity (Complex K-theory of spheres).

[A5]

Collapse determines only the associated graded and not the extensions (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, n>0, and the K-AHSS of the sphere Sn with its standard CW structure having one 0-cell and one n-cell.

1.1A1A2A3

By [A3] the E2 page has E20,q=Kq(∗) and E2n,q=Kq(∗) for every even q, and vanishes in all other positions.

2.1A1A2step 1.1

For n even, consider a differential dr:Erp,q→Erp+r,q−r+1 with source in an even coefficient row q at a nonzero column p∈{0,n}. If r is even then the target row q−r+1 is odd, so the target lies in a vanishing coefficient row. If r is odd then the target column p+r is odd, hence is neither 0 nor n when p=0 (the number n being even) and exceeds n when p=n; in both cases the target column lies outside the support {0,n} of H∗(Sn;Z), and the parity of the target row is irrelevant. In either case the target vanishes, so every differential is zero.

2.2A1A2A4step 1.1

Suppose n is odd. If n=1, every differential has r≥2 by [A1], so a source in column 0 or 1 has target column p+r>1; hence every target is zero. Now let n≥3. The only possibly nonzero differentials are dn:En0,q→Enn,q−n+1 on even rows q. There is no incoming differential at column 0, so the surviving subgroup there is ker⁡dn. On the other hand, the edge quotient E∞0,q=F0Kq(Sn)/F1Kq(Sn) identifies with the image of restriction to the basepoint. For even q, [A4] and Bott periodicity give F1=K~q(Sn)=0, while pullback along Sn→∗ splits restriction, so that image is all of Kq(∗)=Z. Thus ker⁡dn=Z inside its source Z, forcing dn=0.

3.1A4A5step 2.1step 2.2

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 show that all differentials vanish and E2=E∞. If n is odd, each total-degree diagonal has only one nonzero term, so there is no extension problem. If n is even, an even total degree t has two graded pieces, at p=0 and p=n, and the filtration gives 0→FnKt(Sn)≅Z→Kt(Sn)→Kt(∗)≅Z→0. The quotient map is restriction to the basepoint and is split by pullback along Sn→∗, since the composite ∗→Sn→∗ is the identity. Thus Kt(Sn)≅Z⊕Z in even degree, with the reduced summand Fn≅K~t(Sn)≅Z from [A4]; odd total degrees vanish. Hence the only two-piece extension is split, while the odd-dimensional cases have a single graded piece.

4.1step 3.1∎

Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 verify the displayed reduced groups and show that the sphere K-AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.

Source notes

Compare Ji, Theorem 3.1 and §3.2.1, printed pp. 9–11, for the sphere coefficient computation and its placement in the K-AHSS.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources