Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex K-AHSS for spheres

Example

Assume AC. For n>0 the reduced complex K-groups of the sphere are K~0(Sn){Z,n even,0,n odd,K~1(Sn){0,n even,Z,n odd, and the sphere K-AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. For a finite CW complex the K-AHSS has E2p,q=Hp(X;Z) for even q, zero for odd q, and dr:Erp,qErp+r,qr+1 (Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A2]

The coefficient groups of complex K-theory are Bott-periodic: K2k()Z and K2k+1()=0, with all Kq() obtained by shifting K0()=Z (Complex Bott periodicity, Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A3]

For n>0, H0(Sn;Z)Hn(Sn;Z)Z, and all other reduced cohomology groups of the sphere vanish; hence the K-AHSS of Sn is supported in the two columns p=0 and p=n (Complex K-theory of spheres and the universal coefficient comparison of Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A4]

The published sphere computation gives K~0(S2m)Z and K~0(S2m+1)=0, with K1 of the opposite parity (Complex K-theory of spheres).

[A5]

Collapse determines only the associated graded and not the extensions (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, n>0, and the K-AHSS of the sphere Sn with its standard CW structure having one 0-cell and one n-cell.

1.1

By [A3] the E2 page has E20,q=Kq() and E2n,q=Kq() for every even q, and vanishes in all other positions.

A1A2A3
2.1

For n even, consider a differential dr:Erp,qErp+r,qr+1 with source in an even coefficient row q at a nonzero column p{0,n}. If r is even then the target row qr+1 is odd, so the target lies in a vanishing coefficient row. If r is odd then the target column p+r is odd, hence is neither 0 nor n when p=0 (the number n being even) and exceeds n when p=n; in both cases the target column lies outside the support {0,n} of H(Sn;Z), and the parity of the target row is irrelevant. In either case the target vanishes, so every differential is zero.

A1A2step 1.1
2.2

Suppose n is odd. If n=1, every differential has r2 by [A1], so a source in column 0 or 1 has target column p+r>1; hence every target is zero. Now let n3. The only possibly nonzero differentials are dn:En0,qEnn,qn+1 on even rows q. There is no incoming differential at column 0, so the surviving subgroup there is kerdn. On the other hand, the edge quotient E0,q=F0Kq(Sn)/F1Kq(Sn) identifies with the image of restriction to the basepoint. For even q, [A4] and Bott periodicity give F1=K~q(Sn)=0, while pullback along Sn splits restriction, so that image is all of Kq()=Z. Thus kerdn=Z inside its source Z, forcing dn=0.

A1A2A4step 1.1
3.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 show that all differentials vanish and E2=E. If n is odd, each total-degree diagonal has only one nonzero term, so there is no extension problem. If n is even, an even total degree t has two graded pieces, at p=0 and p=n, and the filtration gives 0FnKt(Sn)ZKt(Sn)Kt()Z0. The quotient map is restriction to the basepoint and is split by pullback along Sn, since the composite Sn is the identity. Thus Kt(Sn)ZZ in even degree, with the reduced summand FnK~t(Sn)Z from [A4]; odd total degrees vanish. Hence the only two-piece extension is split, while the odd-dimensional cases have a single graded piece.

A4A5step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 verify the displayed reduced groups and show that the sphere K-AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.

step 3.1

Source notes

Compare Ji, Theorem 3.1 and §3.2.1, printed pp. 9–11, for the sphere coefficient computation and its placement in the K-AHSS.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources