How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Generalized Cohomology and the Atiyah Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Applications of the Fundamental Group
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bocksteins Steenrod Squares and Cohomology Operations
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Topological K Theory and Bott Periodicity
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cup Cap Cross Products and Cohomology Rings
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Derived Functors
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Equivalent Forms of Completeness
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Free Products and Amalgamation
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Generalized Cohomology and the Atiyah Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Hurewicz Whitehead Freudenthal and Cw Approximation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Kunneth Exactness and Splittings over Principal Ideal Domains
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Local Coefficients, Twisted Homology, and Duality
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Obstruction Theory, Postnikov Towers, and Classifying Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Simply Connected Plane Domains: the Grand Equivalence
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cohomology and Coefficient Theorems
- Spectra and Stable Homotopy Groups
- Spectral Sequences
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Formal Laurent Series Field ℝ((t⁻¹)): Cauchy Complete, Non-Archimedean, Not Complete
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Seifert–van Kampen Theorem
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topological Vector Bundles and Grassmannian Classification
- Topology of ℝ
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The computations begin with spheres, where only two columns of the -AHSS are nonzero and the differentials and extension both vanish, matching the Bott-periodic sphere groups. Complex projective space collapses for parity reasons; the truncated polynomial ring is supplied by the projective-bundle calculation, not inferred from the collapse. The closed oriented surface has only the first three columns, so its free graded pieces split and give and .
Real projective space exhibits the opposite phenomenon: the page collapses but the repeated pieces must be assembled, and the complexified tautological line supplies the relation that turns them into one cyclic group of order . The local Bockstein lemmas then compute a nonzero on through , without a -theory Künneth theorem. The final remark records that the proved convergence is finite-CW only and that no infinite-CW convergence is asserted.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The complexified tautological line resolves real-projective K-theory extensions
Statement
Assume AC. Let be the tautological real line on , let be its complexification, and put . Then If or , then has exact additive order and ; moreover
Facts & Assumptions
Assume AC. The tautological real line and its complexification are the bundles classified by the standard inclusions of the respective Grassmannians (classifying maps of the tautological lines, as computed in the topological-vector-bundles page).
Tensor product of real line bundles has transition functions multiplying the transition functions of the factors, and complexification converts into ; the Grothendieck ring has the corresponding multiplicative structure (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles, Grothendieck ring structure and rank map).
Assume AC. The -AHSS of has for even and zero for odd , with differentials of bidegree (Complex K-theory AHSS), and the integral cohomology of is in degree , in the even positive degrees below , zero in the odd degrees below , and in degree when is odd, when is even (the standard universal-coefficient computation of the integral cohomology of real projective space).
The -AHSS is multiplicative, its differentials are derivations and its stable page is the associated graded ring (Multiplicative AHSS for a multiplicative generalized theory).
Atiyah's exact-sequence computation for the projective-space skeleta (Chapter II, §2.7, printed pp. 105–107) shows that , generated by , and that restriction induces an isomorphism carrying the odd-dimensional tautological generator to . It also gives and . Together with , the exact-order statement says are nonzero and on both and . This is the source input used here, not a computation reproved in this library.
Proof
Given: Assume AC, the tautological real line over , the complexification and .
The transition functions of a real line bundle take values in , so the transition functions of are squares of , hence equal to , and is trivial.
The -AHSS of has nonzero entries only in even coefficient rows. A differential with even has odd target row and vanishes. Let be odd and let its source column satisfy . If , as can occur in the top integral column when is odd, then the target column is outside the complex. If , a nonzero source has even by [A3], so its target column is odd and the target vanishes unless ; in that remaining case the source is a torsion group while is torsion-free, so the differential vanishes as well. Finally, a differential with source in the -column cannot be hit, and the -column edge identifies , so those differentials vanish too. Hence all differentials vanish and , so the associated graded of consists of the integral cohomology of the projective space in even degrees, with the degree-two class in filtration two.
Complexifying the triviality of the transition functions gives ; writing in the ring of [A2] therefore gives , that is , and multiplying repeatedly gives for every .
If , both and have trivial reduced by [A5], so has the asserted order . Now suppose . On , [A5] gives and . On , the restriction isomorphism of [A5] carries the tautological to the even-dimensional one, so the same two power statements hold there as well. With from step 2.1, consequently while . Thus has exact order and generates ; the two calculations are the final clauses of [A5].
Steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 give the asserted relations, the exact order of , the cyclicity of the reduced group and the two odd-group computations.
Source notes
The relation follows from . Atiyah's exact-sequence computation in Chapter II, §2.7, printed pp. 105–107, computes the even-dimensional reduced group, proves that restriction from the next odd-dimensional projective space is an isomorphism in , and computes both groups. Those are the recorded source inputs used here.
Reduction of the integral Bockstein is the first Steenrod square
Statement
For the integral Bockstein of the coefficient sequence , reduction modulo two satisfies for every space , every and every . No choice principle is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
For the cyclic coefficient sequences, least nonnegative residues give a specified cochain lift without AC. If is a cocycle, its integral residue lift has for a unique integral cochain , and the resulting class is the integral Bockstein of once its independence of the cocycle representative is checked (Bockstein connecting operation).
The mod-two Bockstein of satisfies for every , and the identification requires no AC (Sq^1 is the mod-two Bockstein).
Proof
Given: An integer , a class , and a mod-two cocycle representing .
Lift coefficientwise to the integral cochain given by the least nonnegative residues. Then is coefficientwise divisible by because modulo two, so there is a unique integral cochain with . Moreover , since in the torsion-free group of integral cochains.
Reducing modulo four gives a -cochain whose image modulo two is and whose coboundary is the reduction of , namely modulo four; hence the mod-two Bockstein of the sequence assigns to the class of modulo two.
The residue construction descends without any choice. If modulo two, let be their integral residue lifts. The integral cochain reduces to zero modulo two, so it equals for a unique integral cochain . If , applying gives , hence . Thus depends only on , using no simultaneous selection from fibres. Reducing modulo two gives the mod-two Bockstein by step 1.2, so by [F2].
Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 prove the stated identity for every space and every degree; both the residue lift and the comparison cochain are uniquely specified coefficientwise, so no choice principle is used.
Source notes
Compare Hatcher, §3.E, printed pp. 303–305, for the integral Bockstein , the reduction identity and the derivation property.
A Bockstein class on RP-two times RP-four has nonzero integral Sq-three
Statement
Assume AC. Let and be the nonzero degree-one generators; viewed on the product by the two projection pullbacks. They generate the mod-two cohomology of with relations . For one has Here the integral operation is defined by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the product , the projection pullbacks of its degree-one generators, and . The operation here is defined by .
For every space and nonnegative degree, (Reduction of the integral Bockstein is the first Steenrod square).
Under AC, , and restriction to is an isomorphism through degree (Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space).
The finite space has one cell in degrees , with cellular incidence numbers zero or two (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map). Cellular homology with any coefficient group computes singular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology). Under AC, cohomology over a field is the full dual of homology over that field (Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field).
Under AC the cohomological Künneth cross product is a graded-ring isomorphism over a PID if every homology group of one factor is finite free over that PID (Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism).
Squares are additive and natural; , for , and ; Cartan computes squares of products (Steenrod squares are well-defined and natural, Steenrod normalization, instability, suspension, and top square, Cartan formula for Steenrod squares).
AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice) through [F2], field duality in [F3] and the additive Künneth isomorphism in [F4]. The Bockstein and finite square calculations use no additional choices.
Proof
Reduce the cellular incidence numbers in [F3] modulo two. The cellular chain complex of is then in degrees , zero elsewhere, with zero differential. Thus its mod-two singular homology is one-dimensional in that range and zero above . Field duality gives the same dimensions and vanishing for cohomology. By [F2], restriction sends to the nonzero power for ; restriction preserves products. Higher powers vanish by the just-proved cohomological vanishing. Therefore the finite ring is exactly .
For a degree-one class , [F5] gives , , and for . Repeated Cartan says that in only choices of among the factors to receive contribute; each contributes . Thus , with the binomial coefficient reduced modulo two. This is a finite product computation, valid directly for the classes on . In particular , , and . [F5, algebra] 2.1 The homology groups of both finite projective factors are finite free over by step 1.1, so the full hypothesis of [F4] holds. Its cross-product ring isomorphism gives , with basis for , . In particular , and are nonzero. The two summands and are distinct basis elements.
Cartan gives . Also since , whereas . Additivity therefore gives .
By [F1], , which is nonzero by step 2.1, so is also nonzero. Step 3.1 gives , and the specified definition implies . Finally by steps 2.1 and 1.2 and Cartan. A zero integral class would have zero reduction, so this proves the claimed integral nonvanishing without asserting injectivity of reduction.
Source notes
Compare Ji, §3.2.4 and Proposition 3.12, printed pp. 11–12, for the computation on and the description of as the integral operation; the particular Bockstein class displayed here supplies the local calculation.
Finite-CW AHSS convergence does not automatically extend to infinite CW complexes
Remark
The convergence theorems of Cohomological Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence and Homological Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence are stated for finite CW complexes. Their proofs use boundedness of the skeletal filtration: for each fixed total degree only finitely many filtration stages can differ, so both the increasing and decreasing families of stable cycles and boundaries stabilize after finitely many steps. For an infinite-dimensional CW complex the skeletal filtration is unbounded, and for a general infinite CW complex the finite-CW argument cannot simply be invoked. An infinite but finite-dimensional CW complex still has a bounded skeletal filtration, so infinitude alone is not the obstruction. In the genuinely unbounded case one needs separate hypotheses and arguments, such as conditional or strong convergence together with the derived-limit analysis of the filtration. No convergence and no failure of convergence is asserted here for infinite complexes; this is a limitation of the stated theorems, not a counterexample.
Source notes
Compare Davis–Kirk, §9.1, printed pp. 237–246, for the finite skeletal-filtration convergence statements and the additional hypotheses required in the infinite case.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Complex K-AHSS for spheres
Example
Assume AC. For the reduced complex -groups of the sphere are and the sphere -AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.
Facts & Assumptions
Assume AC. For a finite CW complex the -AHSS has for even , zero for odd , and (Complex K-theory AHSS).
The coefficient groups of complex -theory are Bott-periodic: and , with all obtained by shifting (Complex Bott periodicity, Complex K-theory AHSS).
For , , and all other reduced cohomology groups of the sphere vanish; hence the -AHSS of is supported in the two columns and (Complex K-theory of spheres and the universal coefficient comparison of Complex K-theory AHSS).
The published sphere computation gives and , with of the opposite parity (Complex K-theory of spheres).
Collapse determines only the associated graded and not the extensions (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).
Verification
Given: Assume AC, , and the -AHSS of the sphere with its standard CW structure having one -cell and one -cell.
By [A3] the page has and for every even , and vanishes in all other positions.
For even, consider a differential with source in an even coefficient row at a nonzero column . If is even then the target row is odd, so the target lies in a vanishing coefficient row. If is odd then the target column is odd, hence is neither nor when (the number being even) and exceeds when ; in both cases the target column lies outside the support of , and the parity of the target row is irrelevant. In either case the target vanishes, so every differential is zero.
Suppose is odd. If , every differential has by [A1], so a source in column or has target column ; hence every target is zero. Now let . The only possibly nonzero differentials are on even rows . There is no incoming differential at column , so the surviving subgroup there is . On the other hand, the edge quotient identifies with the image of restriction to the basepoint. For even , [A4] and Bott periodicity give , while pullback along splits restriction, so that image is all of . Thus inside its source , forcing .
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 show that all differentials vanish and . If is odd, each total-degree diagonal has only one nonzero term, so there is no extension problem. If is even, an even total degree has two graded pieces, at and , and the filtration gives . The quotient map is restriction to the basepoint and is split by pullback along , since the composite is the identity. Thus in even degree, with the reduced summand from [A4]; odd total degrees vanish. Hence the only two-piece extension is split, while the odd-dimensional cases have a single graded piece.
Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 verify the displayed reduced groups and show that the sphere -AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.
Source notes
Compare Ji, Theorem 3.1 and §3.2.1, printed pp. 9–11, for the sphere coefficient computation and its placement in the -AHSS.
Complex K-AHSS for complex projective space
Example
Assume AC. For and the complex -theory Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence collapses at , the group vanishes, and where is the tautological complex line. The ring is supplied by the independent relative-product calculation, not by the additive page.
Facts & Assumptions
Assume AC, inherited from the complex -theory suppliers and the cellular cohomology comparison (The Axiom of Choice).
On finite CW pairs, complex -theory has natural cofiber long exact sequences, homotopy invariance, suspension, finite-wedge additivity and coefficients , (Complex K-theory is a two-periodic generalized cohomology theory). Separately, if is a closed based cofibration of compact Hausdorff well-pointed CGWH spaces, reduced has the exact quotient sequence and its successive mapping-cone continuation (Reduced K-theory exact sequence of a cofibration). This second interface is the one used below for the coordinate balls , which need not be subcomplexes of the Schubert CW structure.
The Schubert structure of is finite CW, with symbols and cells of real dimension (Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure, Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).
Under AC, cellular cochains compute singular cohomology, including constant integral coefficients (Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients).
An initial exact couple generates a spectral sequence with of bidegree and , where and with the specified shifts (An exact couple generates a spectral sequence, Exact couple).
On , the reduced tautological class generates in the fixed clutching convention. For compact Hausdorff based well-pointed spaces, the reduced external product is defined on their smash product and is natural under based pullback; the -fold product of generates by Bott periodicity (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²), External product in complex K-theory, Complex Bott periodicity).
Collapse and convergence identify the associated graded family; they supply no general ring-extension data (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).
Consecutive nonempty skeletal quotients retain just their relative cells and the quotient vertex; subcomplex inclusions are cofibrations and their based cofibers are equivalent to the quotients (CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex, Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations, Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient).
Verification
Given: , AC, and with its Schubert skeleta; put for and for .
By [F2], the integral cellular cochains are in degrees and zero elsewhere; every cellular coboundary is zero. By [F3], has exactly these groups. This calculation needs no cohomology ring presentation.
Construct the additive skeletal sequence directly using the actual -pair sequences of [F1]. In homological indexing put , ; let be restriction, the pair connecting map, and the forget-relative map. The pair long exact sequences give , , with exactly the shifts in [F4]. Thus [F4] gives a spectral sequence. Reindex to obtain and .
We compute the ring independently of the spectral sequence. Induct on . For , the tautological line on the point is trivial, so and . Induct simultaneously that and that is a basis there. The odd part of the pair sequence and the odd sphere coefficient give . The cofibration has quotient by [F2] and [F7]; [F1] and the even-sphere coefficients give a short exact sequence It remains to identify the kernel generator. Realize as the scalar-orbit space of the boundary of , and let be the image of the face with the th coordinate on . Normalizing that coordinate to identifies with the product of the other disks, so is a closed -ball, , and . The radial collars of the polydisk faces descend through scalar multiplication and give neighborhood deformation retractions for every and every finite union used below. Thus their inclusions are closed cofibrations of compact Hausdorff CGWH spaces, and the corresponding quotient basepoints are well-pointed. The compact-cofibration exact sequence in [F1], rather than the finite-CW-pair clause, therefore applies. The tautological line has the section obtained by setting its th coordinate equal to on , so exactness gives a relative lift of . For a compact Hausdorff and closed cofibration subspaces whose union is also collared as above, the quotient spaces are based well-pointed and [F5] supplies the reduced product. Pulling it back along the based diagonal gives whose forget-support image is the ordinary product by naturality of the external product. On , put . Contracting the other disk coordinates gives a pair equivalence . The two line sections normalized in coordinates and differ on this boundary by or its inverse according to clutching direction. Its winding is , so the relative restriction of is the Hopf generator up to sign by [F5]. The lift is unambiguous because . Hence the relative product restricts under to the -fold Bott generator and is therefore a generator by [F5]. Put . In the scalar-orbit coordinates a point of has and . The equivariant homotopy retracts onto the standard given by . It fixes that subspace. The induced map of relative pair sequences therefore identifies with : on absolute groups it is identity and on subspace groups it is the retraction isomorphism, so exactness gives the relative comparison. Thus this relative generator maps to the kernel generator for restriction to , while forgetting support maps it to . Therefore is a basis. Take the relative product of all lifts . It lies in , and its absolute image is , proving nilpotence without a forward induction. This completes the induction and proves No multiplicative spectral-sequence theorem is used.
For even in , the relative quotient is , with the term interpreted as the absolute group of the single vertex. For odd the successive skeleta agree, and outside this range the relative groups vanish. The quotient identifications [F7], suspension and coefficients [F1] therefore give precisely when is in that even range and is even, and zero otherwise. Every differential raises total degree by one, so every possible source of a nonzero differential has a zero target. Induction on the page gives for every and the same support on all pages. By step 1.1, the resulting second page has for even and zero for odd . In particular the K-AHSS collapses at .
For completeness verify the finite abutment from the actual couple. Fix , , and use . The formulas of [F4] give the stable numerator once the upper skeleton is , and the stable denominator once the lower skeleton is empty. Thus identifies with . Restriction from surjects onto this intersection and has kernel . Hence . The filtration is nested by functoriality, equals the whole group for , and is zero for .
By step 2.1 every stable quotient in total degree one vanishes. The finite filtration of step 2.2 then has equal adjacent stages, so its whole group is its zero final stage: . In total degree zero its nonzero quotients are in columns , while step 1.3 supplies the actual ring with the exact tautological-line convention .
The collapse and vanishing are proved in steps 2.1 and 3.1, and the ring presentation is step 1.3, not an inference from the additive page, consistently with [F6]. For the point has only column zero, , and is trivial, so and . AC enters only through [A1]. This proves all assertions.
Source notes
Hatcher, Propositions 2.23–2.24, printed pp. 66–68, proves the even-cell additive calculation and the tautological-line ring presentation by relative products. The additive exact-couple computation above uses only actual finite K-pair sequences and the even-cell support; it requires no general multiplicative AHSS theorem.
Complex K-AHSS for a closed oriented surface
Example
Assume AC. Let be a closed connected oriented surface of genus . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Assume AC. The -AHSS has for even , zero for odd , and (Complex K-theory AHSS).
The integral cohomology of is in degrees and , in degree , and zero in all other degrees; the cohomology is free in every degree.
A finite filtration of free abelian groups whose successive quotients are free splits: the group is the direct sum of its graded pieces. This is the standard splitting of extensions of free abelian groups and requires no choice.
Collapse determines only the associated graded object, so a splitting argument is needed for the extensions (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).
Verification
Given: Assume AC, a closed connected oriented surface , and its -AHSS.
By [A2] the page has nonzero entries in each even coefficient row, all free abelian, and vanishes in odd coefficient rows.
Every differential with has target in the odd coefficient row when is even, and in the column when is odd; since the odd coefficient rows and the columns above the surface dimension vanish, all differentials for vanish. The first differential is the cellular coboundary, so is already the cohomology page by construction.
The stable page has graded pieces in total degree zero for the rows contributing and , and in total degree one from , so the associated graded of is and that of is .
Since all graded pieces are free, the finite filtrations split by [A3], so with and ; the extension data are not inferred from the collapse but from the splitting of free extensions.
This verifies the displayed groups and .
Source notes
Compare Ji, §3.2.1, printed pp. 10–11, for the surface computation in the -AHSS.
Complex K-AHSS for real projective space
Example
Assume AC. For , and For , the repeated graded pieces of the collapsed page form a nonsplit extension; for there is no torsion piece, and for there is a single piece and hence no nontrivial additive extension.
Facts & Assumptions
Assume AC. The -AHSS of has for even and zero for odd , with all differentials zero (every target lies in an odd degree below or in the top degree with a torsion source, and the -column survives by the rank of its edge); the integral cohomology is in degree , in the even positive degrees below , zero in the odd degrees below , and in degree for odd , for even (Complex K-theory AHSS, the standard universal-coefficient computation).
Assume AC. The complexified tautological line has with , exact order , and ; the odd groups are and (The complexified tautological line resolves real-projective K-theory extensions).
Collapse alone determines only the associated graded; the cyclic structure is genuine extension data (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object, Multiplicative AHSS for a multiplicative generalized theory).
Verification
Given: Assume AC, , and the -AHSS of for or .
By [A1] the stable page has one in each even cohomological degree up to the dimension and, for odd , an extra in the top degree; all differentials vanish, so these are the graded pieces of .
The graded pieces in total degree zero are copies of together with the from degree zero; the associated graded of is therefore of order .
By [A2] the class has exact order and generates , so the copies of assemble into the single cyclic group . For this is a nonsplit extension because is not cyclic; for the reduced group is zero, and for it is the lone graded piece . The odd-degree statement is the corresponding clause of [A2].
Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 verify the displayed groups and identify exactly when a nonsplit extension occurs.
Source notes
Compare Ji, §3.2.3, printed pp. 10–11, for the vanishing of the differentials and the warning that the spectral sequence alone does not determine the torsion group.
A nonzero d-three in the K-AHSS for RP-two times RP-four
Example
Assume AC. In the complex -theory Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence for , let and be the degree-one mod-two generators and let . Then equivalently agrees with on this class. No complex -theory Künneth theorem or group-order argument is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Assume AC. In the complex -AHSS, and on all even coefficient rows (The first possible complex K-theory AHSS differential is integral Sq-three).
Assume AC. For the degree-one mod-two generators one has (A Bockstein class on RP-two times RP-four has nonzero integral Sq-three).
Verification
Given: Assume AC, the space , its -AHSS, and .
The class lies in : the coefficient row is even and is the integral cohomology degree of the target, and by [A1] the differential on this row is the operation .
By [A2] the value of that operation on is .
Therefore is nonzero, which exhibits a nonzero and shows that the -AHSS does not collapse for this space.
Steps 1.1 and 3.1 verify the displayed nonzero value of without using a -theory Künneth theorem.
Source notes
Compare Ji, §3.2.4, Figure 2 and Proposition 3.12, printed pp. 11–12, for the nonzero on .
Sources
- M. F. Atiyah, K-Theory, Chapter II, §2.7, printed pp. 105–106
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §3.E, printed pp. 303–305
- Caleb Ji, The Atiyah–Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence, §3.2.4 and Proposition 3.12, printed pp. 11–12
- James Davis and Paul Kirk, Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology, §9.1, printed pp. 237–246
- Caleb Ji, The Atiyah–Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence, §3.2.1 and Theorem 3.1, printed pp. 9–11
- Allen Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory, Propositions 2.23–2.24, printed pp. 66–68
- Caleb Ji, The Atiyah–Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence, §3.2.1, printed pp. 10–11
- Caleb Ji, The Atiyah–Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence, §3.2.3, printed pp. 10–11
- Caleb Ji, The Atiyah–Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence, §3.2.4, Figure 2 and Proposition 3.12, printed pp. 11–12