Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Generalized Cohomology and the Atiyah Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The computations begin with spheres, where only two columns of the K-AHSS are nonzero and the differentials and extension both vanish, matching the Bott-periodic sphere groups. Complex projective space collapses for parity reasons; the truncated polynomial ring is supplied by the projective-bundle calculation, not inferred from the collapse. The closed oriented surface has only the first three columns, so its free graded pieces split and give K0Z2 and K1Z2g.

Real projective space exhibits the opposite phenomenon: the page collapses but the repeated Z/2 pieces must be assembled, and the complexified tautological line supplies the relation α2=2α that turns them into one cyclic group of order 2m. The local Bockstein lemmas then compute a nonzero d3 on RP2×RP4 through βZSq2ρ2, without a K-theory Künneth theorem. The final remark records that the proved convergence is finite-CW only and that no infinite-CW convergence is asserted.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

The complexified tautological line resolves real-projective K-theory extensions

Statement

Assume AC. Let λ be the tautological real line on RPr, let ξ=λC be its complexification, and put α=[ξ]1K0(RPr). Then α2=2α,αk=(2)k1α (k1). If r=2m or r=2m+1, then α has exact additive order 2m and K~0(RPr)=Zα; moreover K1(RP2m)=0,K1(RP2m+1)Z.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. The tautological real line λ and its complexification ξ=λC are the bundles classified by the standard inclusions of the respective Grassmannians (classifying maps of the tautological lines, as computed in the topological-vector-bundles page).

[A2]

Tensor product of real line bundles has transition functions multiplying the transition functions of the factors, and complexification converts λRλ into ξCξ; the Grothendieck ring has the corresponding multiplicative structure (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles, Grothendieck ring structure and rank map).

[A3]

Assume AC. The K-AHSS of RPr has E2p,q=Hp(RPr;Z) for even q and zero for odd q, with differentials of bidegree (r,1r) (Complex K-theory AHSS), and the integral cohomology of RPr is Z in degree 0, Z/2 in the even positive degrees below r, zero in the odd degrees below r, and Z in degree r when r is odd, Z/2 when r is even (the standard universal-coefficient computation of the integral cohomology of real projective space).

[A4]

The K-AHSS is multiplicative, its differentials are derivations and its stable page is the associated graded ring (Multiplicative AHSS for a multiplicative generalized theory).

[A5]

Atiyah's exact-sequence computation for the projective-space skeleta (Chapter II, §2.7, printed pp. 105–107) shows that K~0(RP2m)Z/2m, generated by x=[L]1, and that restriction induces an isomorphism K~0(RP2m+1)K~0(RP2m) carrying the odd-dimensional tautological generator to x. It also gives K1(RP2m)=0 and K1(RP2m+1)Z. Together with x2=2x, the exact-order statement says x,x2,,xm are nonzero and xm+1=0 on both RP2m and RP2m+1. This is the source input used here, not a computation reproved in this library.

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, the tautological real line λ over RPr, the complexification ξ=λC and α=[ξ]1.

1.1

The transition functions of a real line bundle take values in {±1}, so the transition functions of λRλ are squares of ±1, hence equal to 1, and λRλ is trivial.

A1A2
1.2

The K-AHSS of RPr has nonzero entries only in even coefficient rows. A differential ds with s even has odd target row and vanishes. Let s be odd and let its source column satisfy p1. If p=r, as can occur in the top integral column when r is odd, then the target column r+s is outside the complex. If 0<p<r, a nonzero source has p even by [A3], so its target column p+s is odd and the target vanishes unless p+s=r; in that remaining case the source is a torsion group while Hr(RPr;Z)=Z is torsion-free, so the differential vanishes as well. Finally, a differential with source in the 0-column cannot be hit, and the 0-column edge identifies E0,qhq(pt)=Z=E20,q, so those differentials vanish too. Hence all differentials vanish and E2=E, so the associated graded of K0(RPr) consists of the integral cohomology of the projective space in even degrees, with the degree-two class in filtration two.

A3A4
2.1

Complexifying the triviality of the transition functions gives ξCξεC1; writing α=[ξ]1 in the ring of [A2] therefore gives (1+α)2=1, that is α2=2α, and multiplying repeatedly gives αk=(2)k1α for every k1.

A2step 1.1algebra
3.1

If m=0, both RP0 and RP1S1 have trivial reduced K0 by [A5], so α=0 has the asserted order 1. Now suppose m1. On RP2m, [A5] gives αm0 and αm+1=0. On RP2m+1, the restriction isomorphism of [A5] carries the tautological α to the even-dimensional one, so the same two power statements hold there as well. With α2=2α from step 2.1, consequently 2mα=(1)mαm+1=0 while 2m1α=(1)m1αm0. Thus α has exact order 2m and generates K~0(RPr); the two K1 calculations are the final clauses of [A5].

A5step 2.1
4.1

Steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 give the asserted relations, the exact order of α, the cyclicity of the reduced group and the two odd-group computations.

step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

Source notes

The relation α2=2α follows from λλε1. Atiyah's exact-sequence computation in Chapter II, §2.7, printed pp. 105–107, computes the even-dimensional reduced group, proves that restriction from the next odd-dimensional projective space is an isomorphism in K0, and computes both K1 groups. Those are the recorded source inputs used here.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

Reduction of the integral Bockstein is the first Steenrod square

Statement

For the integral Bockstein βZ:Hn(X;F2)Hn+1(X;Z) of the coefficient sequence 0Z2ZF20, reduction modulo two satisfies ρ2βZ(x)=Sq1(x) for every space X, every n0 and every xHn(X;F2). No choice principle is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

For the cyclic coefficient sequences, least nonnegative residues give a specified cochain lift without AC. If cCn(X;F2) is a cocycle, its integral residue lift c~ has δc~=2a for a unique integral cochain a, and the resulting class is the integral Bockstein of 0Z2ZF20 once its independence of the cocycle representative is checked (Bockstein connecting operation).

[F2]

The mod-two Bockstein β of 0F22Z/4F20 satisfies Sq1(x)=β(x) for every xHn(X;F2), and the identification requires no AC (Sq^1 is the mod-two Bockstein).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: An integer n0, a class xHn(X;F2), and a mod-two cocycle c representing x.

1.1

Lift c coefficientwise to the integral cochain c~ given by the least nonnegative residues. Then δc~ is coefficientwise divisible by 2 because δc=0 modulo two, so there is a unique integral cochain a with δc~=2a. Moreover δa=0, since 2δa=δ2c~=0 in the torsion-free group of integral cochains.

F1given
1.2

Reducing c~ modulo four gives a Z/4-cochain whose image modulo two is c and whose coboundary is the reduction of 2a, namely 2a modulo four; hence the mod-two Bockstein of the sequence 0F2Z/4F20 assigns to x the class of δ(c~)/2=a modulo two.

F1given
2.1

The residue construction descends without any choice. If c=c+δu modulo two, let c~,c~,u~ be their integral residue lifts. The integral cochain c~c~δu~ reduces to zero modulo two, so it equals 2h for a unique integral cochain h. If δc~=2a, applying δ gives 2a=2a+2δh, hence a=a+δh. Thus [a] depends only on x, using no simultaneous selection from fibres. Reducing a modulo two gives the mod-two Bockstein by step 1.2, so ρ2βZ(x)=β(x)=Sq1(x) by [F2].

F1F2step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 prove the stated identity for every space and every degree; both the residue lift and the comparison cochain h are uniquely specified coefficientwise, so no choice principle is used.

step 2.1

Source notes

Compare Hatcher, §3.E, printed pp. 303–305, for the integral Bockstein β~, the reduction identity β=ρβ~ and the derivation property.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

A Bockstein class on RP-two times RP-four has nonzero integral Sq-three

Statement

Assume AC. Let uH1(RP2;F2) and vH1(RP4;F2) be the nonzero degree-one generators; viewed on the product by the two projection pullbacks. They generate the mod-two cohomology of RP2×RP4 with relations u3=0=v5. For z=βZ(uv)H3(RP2×RP4;Z) one has SqZ3(z)=βZ(uv4)0. Here the integral operation is defined by SqZ3:=βZSq2ρ2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the product Y=RP2×RP4, the projection pullbacks u,v of its degree-one generators, and z=βZ(uv). The operation here is defined by SqZ3=βZSq2ρ2.

[F1]

For every space and nonnegative degree, ρ2βZ=Sq1 (Reduction of the integral Bockstein is the first Steenrod square).

[F2]

Under AC, H(RP;F2)=F2[a], and restriction to RPm is an isomorphism through degree m (Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space).

[F3]

The finite space RPm has one cell in degrees 0,,m, with cellular incidence numbers zero or two (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map). Cellular homology with any coefficient group computes singular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology). Under AC, cohomology over a field is the full dual of homology over that field (Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field).

[F4]

Under AC the cohomological Künneth cross product is a graded-ring isomorphism over a PID if every homology group of one factor is finite free over that PID (Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism).

[F5]

Squares are additive and natural; Sq0x=x, Sqkx=0 for k>x, and Sqxx=x2; Cartan computes squares of products (Steenrod squares are well-defined and natural, Steenrod normalization, instability, suspension, and top square, Cartan formula for Steenrod squares).

[A1]

AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice) through [F2], field duality in [F3] and the additive Künneth isomorphism in [F4]. The Bockstein and finite square calculations use no additional choices.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Reduce the cellular incidence numbers in [F3] modulo two. The cellular chain complex of RPm is then F2 in degrees 0,,m, zero elsewhere, with zero differential. Thus its mod-two singular homology is one-dimensional in that range and zero above m. Field duality gives the same dimensions and vanishing for cohomology. By [F2], restriction sends aj to the nonzero power amj for 0jm; restriction preserves products. Higher powers vanish by the just-proved cohomological vanishing. Therefore the finite ring is exactly F2[am]/(amm+1).

F2F3A1algebra
1.2

For a degree-one class t, [F5] gives Sq0t=t, Sq1t=t2, and Sqit=0 for i>1. Repeated Cartan says that in Sqi(tj) only choices of i among the j factors to receive Sq1 contribute; each contributes tj+i. Thus Sqi(tj)=(ji)tj+i, with the binomial coefficient reduced modulo two. This is a finite product computation, valid directly for the classes u,v on Y. In particular Sq1(t2)=0, Sq2(t2)=t4, and Sq1(t4)=0. [F5, algebra] 2.1 The homology groups of both finite projective factors are finite free over F2 by step 1.1, so the full hypothesis of [F4] holds. Its cross-product ring isomorphism gives H(Y;F2)=F2[u,v]/(u3,v5), with basis uivj for 0i2, 0j4. In particular uv, uv4 and u2v4 are nonzero. The two summands u2v and uv2 are distinct basis elements.

step 1.1F4A1algebra
3.1

Cartan gives Sq1(uv)=u2v+uv2. Also Sq2(u2v)=u4v+0+0=0 since u3=0, whereas Sq2(uv2)=0+0+uv4=uv4. Additivity therefore gives Sq2(u2v+uv2)=uv4.

step 2.1step 1.2F5algebra
4.1

By [F1], ρ2z=Sq1(uv)=u2v+uv2, which is nonzero by step 2.1, so z is also nonzero. Step 3.1 gives Sq2ρ2z=uv4, and the specified definition implies SqZ3(z)=βZ(uv4). Finally ρ2βZ(uv4)=Sq1(uv4)=u2v4+uSq1(v4)=u2v40 by steps 2.1 and 1.2 and Cartan. A zero integral class would have zero reduction, so this proves the claimed integral nonvanishing without asserting injectivity of reduction.

step 2.1step 1.2step 3.1F1F5given

Source notes

Compare Ji, §3.2.4 and Proposition 3.12, printed pp. 11–12, for the d3 computation on RP2×RP4 and the description of d3 as the integral operation; the particular Bockstein class displayed here supplies the local calculation.

RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

Finite-CW AHSS convergence does not automatically extend to infinite CW complexes

Remark

The convergence theorems of Cohomological Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence and Homological Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence are stated for finite CW complexes. Their proofs use boundedness of the skeletal filtration: for each fixed total degree only finitely many filtration stages can differ, so both the increasing and decreasing families of stable cycles and boundaries stabilize after finitely many steps. For an infinite-dimensional CW complex the skeletal filtration is unbounded, and for a general infinite CW complex the finite-CW argument cannot simply be invoked. An infinite but finite-dimensional CW complex still has a bounded skeletal filtration, so infinitude alone is not the obstruction. In the genuinely unbounded case one needs separate hypotheses and arguments, such as conditional or strong convergence together with the derived-limit analysis of the filtration. No convergence and no failure of convergence is asserted here for infinite complexes; this is a limitation of the stated theorems, not a counterexample.

Source notes

Compare Davis–Kirk, §9.1, printed pp. 237–246, for the finite skeletal-filtration convergence statements and the additional hypotheses required in the infinite case.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

Complex K-AHSS for spheres

Example

Assume AC. For n>0 the reduced complex K-groups of the sphere are K~0(Sn){Z,n even,0,n odd,K~1(Sn){0,n even,Z,n odd, and the sphere K-AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. For a finite CW complex the K-AHSS has E2p,q=Hp(X;Z) for even q, zero for odd q, and dr:Erp,qErp+r,qr+1 (Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A2]

The coefficient groups of complex K-theory are Bott-periodic: K2k()Z and K2k+1()=0, with all Kq() obtained by shifting K0()=Z (Complex Bott periodicity, Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A3]

For n>0, H0(Sn;Z)Hn(Sn;Z)Z, and all other reduced cohomology groups of the sphere vanish; hence the K-AHSS of Sn is supported in the two columns p=0 and p=n (Complex K-theory of spheres and the universal coefficient comparison of Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A4]

The published sphere computation gives K~0(S2m)Z and K~0(S2m+1)=0, with K1 of the opposite parity (Complex K-theory of spheres).

[A5]

Collapse determines only the associated graded and not the extensions (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, n>0, and the K-AHSS of the sphere Sn with its standard CW structure having one 0-cell and one n-cell.

1.1

By [A3] the E2 page has E20,q=Kq() and E2n,q=Kq() for every even q, and vanishes in all other positions.

A1A2A3
2.1

For n even, consider a differential dr:Erp,qErp+r,qr+1 with source in an even coefficient row q at a nonzero column p{0,n}. If r is even then the target row qr+1 is odd, so the target lies in a vanishing coefficient row. If r is odd then the target column p+r is odd, hence is neither 0 nor n when p=0 (the number n being even) and exceeds n when p=n; in both cases the target column lies outside the support {0,n} of H(Sn;Z), and the parity of the target row is irrelevant. In either case the target vanishes, so every differential is zero.

A1A2step 1.1
2.2

Suppose n is odd. If n=1, every differential has r2 by [A1], so a source in column 0 or 1 has target column p+r>1; hence every target is zero. Now let n3. The only possibly nonzero differentials are dn:En0,qEnn,qn+1 on even rows q. There is no incoming differential at column 0, so the surviving subgroup there is kerdn. On the other hand, the edge quotient E0,q=F0Kq(Sn)/F1Kq(Sn) identifies with the image of restriction to the basepoint. For even q, [A4] and Bott periodicity give F1=K~q(Sn)=0, while pullback along Sn splits restriction, so that image is all of Kq()=Z. Thus kerdn=Z inside its source Z, forcing dn=0.

A1A2A4step 1.1
3.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 show that all differentials vanish and E2=E. If n is odd, each total-degree diagonal has only one nonzero term, so there is no extension problem. If n is even, an even total degree t has two graded pieces, at p=0 and p=n, and the filtration gives 0FnKt(Sn)ZKt(Sn)Kt()Z0. The quotient map is restriction to the basepoint and is split by pullback along Sn, since the composite Sn is the identity. Thus Kt(Sn)ZZ in even degree, with the reduced summand FnK~t(Sn)Z from [A4]; odd total degrees vanish. Hence the only two-piece extension is split, while the odd-dimensional cases have a single graded piece.

A4A5step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 verify the displayed reduced groups and show that the sphere K-AHSS has no nonzero differential and no nontrivial extension.

step 3.1

Source notes

Compare Ji, Theorem 3.1 and §3.2.1, printed pp. 9–11, for the sphere coefficient computation and its placement in the K-AHSS.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

Complex K-AHSS for complex projective space

Example

Assume AC. For n0 and CPn the complex K-theory Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence collapses at E2, the group K1(CPn) vanishes, and K0(CPn)Z[α]/(αn+1),α=[L]1, where L is the tautological complex line. The ring is supplied by the independent relative-product calculation, not by the additive page.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC, inherited from the complex K-theory suppliers and the cellular cohomology comparison (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

On finite CW pairs, complex K-theory has natural cofiber long exact sequences, homotopy invariance, suspension, finite-wedge additivity and coefficients K2j()=Z, K2j+1()=0 (Complex K-theory is a two-periodic generalized cohomology theory). Separately, if AY is a closed based cofibration of compact Hausdorff well-pointed CGWH spaces, reduced K0 has the exact quotient sequence and its successive mapping-cone continuation (Reduced K-theory exact sequence of a cofibration). This second interface is the one used below for the coordinate balls Ci, which need not be subcomplexes of the Schubert CW structure.

[F2]

The Schubert structure of CPn=Gr1(Cn+1) is finite CW, with symbols a=1,,n+1 and cells of real dimension 2(a1) (Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure, Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).

[F3]

Under AC, cellular cochains compute singular cohomology, including constant integral coefficients (Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients).

[F4]

An initial exact couple generates a spectral sequence with dr of bidegree (r,r1) and Er=Nr/Br, where Nr=k1imir1 and Br=jkerir1 with the specified shifts (An exact couple generates a spectral sequence, Exact couple).

[F5]

On CP1=S2, the reduced tautological class β=[L]1 generates K~0(S2) in the fixed clutching convention. For compact Hausdorff based well-pointed spaces, the reduced external product is defined on their smash product and is natural under based pullback; the r-fold product of β generates K~0(S2r) by Bott periodicity (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²), External product in complex K-theory, Complex Bott periodicity).

[F6]

Collapse and convergence identify the associated graded family; they supply no general ring-extension data (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).

[F7]

Consecutive nonempty skeletal quotients retain just their relative cells and the quotient vertex; subcomplex inclusions are cofibrations and their based cofibers are equivalent to the quotients (CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex, Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations, Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: n0, AC, and X=CPn with its Schubert skeleta; put Xp= for p<0 and Xp=X for p2n.

1.1

By [F2], the integral cellular cochains are Z in degrees 0,2,,2n and zero elsewhere; every cellular coboundary is zero. By [F3], Hp(X;Z) has exactly these groups. This calculation needs no cohomology ring presentation.

A1F2F3
1.2

Construct the additive skeletal sequence directly using the actual K-pair sequences of [F1]. In homological indexing put Da,b=Kab1(Xa1), Ea,b=Kab(Xa,Xa1); let i be restriction, j the pair connecting map, and k the forget-relative map. The pair long exact sequences give imi=kerj, imj=kerk, imk=keri with exactly the shifts in [F4]. Thus [F4] gives a spectral sequence. Reindex (p,q)=(a,b) to obtain E1p,q=Kp+q(Xp,Xp1) and dr:(p,q)(p+r,qr+1).

A1F1F4
1.3

We compute the ring independently of the spectral sequence. Induct on r. For r=0, the tautological line on the point is trivial, so α=0 and K0(CP0)=Z. Induct simultaneously that K1(CPr1)=0 and that 1,α,,αr1 is a basis there. The odd part of the pair sequence and the odd sphere coefficient give K1(CPr)=0. The cofibration CPr1CPr has quotient S2r by [F2] and [F7]; [F1] and the even-sphere coefficients give a short exact sequence 0K~0(S2r)K0(CPr)K0(CPr1)0. It remains to identify the kernel generator. Realize CPr as the scalar-orbit space of the boundary of D02××Dr2, and let Ci be the image of the face with the ith coordinate on Di2. Normalizing that coordinate to 1 identifies Ci with the product of the other disks, so Ci is a closed 2r-ball, CPr=iCi, and CiCj=CiCj. The radial collars of the polydisk faces descend through scalar multiplication and give neighborhood deformation retractions for every Ci and every finite union used below. Thus their inclusions are closed cofibrations of compact Hausdorff CGWH spaces, and the corresponding quotient basepoints are well-pointed. The compact-cofibration exact sequence in [F1], rather than the finite-CW-pair clause, therefore applies. The tautological line has the section obtained by setting its ith coordinate equal to 1 on Ci, so exactness gives a relative lift αiK0(CPr,Ci) of α. For a compact Hausdorff Y and closed cofibration subspaces A,B whose union is also collared as above, the quotient spaces are based well-pointed and [F5] supplies the reduced product. Pulling it back along the based diagonal Y/(AB)(Y/A)(Y/B) gives K0(Y,A)K0(Y,B)K0(Y,AB), whose forget-support image is the ordinary product by naturality of the external product. On C0=D12××Dr2, put iC0={zi=1}. Contracting the other disk coordinates gives a pair equivalence (C0,iC0)(Di2,Di2). The two line sections normalized in coordinates 0 and i differ on this boundary by zi or its inverse according to clutching direction. Its winding is ±1, so the relative restriction of αi is the Hopf generator up to sign by [F5]. The lift is unambiguous because K1(Ci)=K1()=0. Hence the relative product α1αr restricts under C0/C0(D2/D2)rS2r to the r-fold Bott generator and is therefore a generator by [F5]. Put U=C1Cr. In the scalar-orbit coordinates a point of U has maxj1zj=1 and z01. The equivariant homotopy (z0,z1,,zr)((1t)z0,z1,,zr) retracts U onto the standard CPr1 given by z0=0. It fixes that subspace. The induced map of relative pair sequences therefore identifies K0(CPr,U) with K0(CPr,CPr1): on absolute groups it is identity and on subspace groups it is the retraction isomorphism, so exactness gives the relative comparison. Thus this relative generator maps to the kernel generator for restriction to CPr1, while forgetting support maps it to αr. Therefore 1,α,,αr is a basis. Take the relative product of all r+1 lifts α0,,αr. It lies in K0(CPr,iCi)=K0(CPr,CPr)=0, and its absolute image is αr+1, proving nilpotence without a forward induction. This completes the induction and proves K0(CPn)Z[α]/(αn+1). No multiplicative spectral-sequence theorem is used.

F1F2F5F7constructalgebra
2.1

For even p in 0p2n, the relative quotient is Sp, with the p=0 term interpreted as the absolute group of the single vertex. For odd p the successive skeleta agree, and outside this range the relative groups vanish. The quotient identifications [F7], suspension and coefficients [F1] therefore give E1p,q=Z precisely when p is in that even range and q is even, and zero otherwise. Every differential raises total degree by one, so every possible source of a nonzero differential has a zero target. Induction on the page gives dr=0 for every r1 and the same support on all pages. By step 1.1, the resulting second page has E2p,qHp(X;Z) for even q and zero for odd q. In particular the K-AHSS collapses at E2.

F1F2F7step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

For completeness verify the finite abutment from the actual couple. Fix p,q, t=p+q, and use (a,b)=(p,q). The formulas of [F4] give the stable numerator N=k1im(Kt(X)Kt(Xp)) once the upper skeleton is X, and the stable denominator B=jKt1(Xp1)=kerk once the lower skeleton is empty. Thus k identifies Ep,q with im(Kt(X)Kt(Xp))ker(Kt(Xp)Kt(Xp1)). Restriction from FpKt(X):=ker(Kt(X)Kt(Xp1)) surjects onto this intersection and has kernel Fp+1Kt(X). Hence Ep,qFpKt(X)/Fp+1Kt(X). The filtration is nested by functoriality, equals the whole group for p0, and is zero for p>2n.

F1F4step 1.2
3.1

By step 2.1 every stable quotient in total degree one vanishes. The finite filtration of step 2.2 then has equal adjacent stages, so its whole group is its zero final stage: K1(X)=0. In total degree zero its nonzero quotients are Z in columns 0,2,,2n, while step 1.3 supplies the actual ring with the exact tautological-line convention α=[L]1.

step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

The collapse and vanishing are proved in steps 2.1 and 3.1, and the ring presentation is step 1.3, not an inference from the additive page, consistently with [F6]. For n=0 the point has only column zero, K1=0, and L is trivial, so α=0 and K0=Z. AC enters only through [A1]. This proves all assertions.

A1F6step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1

Source notes

Hatcher, Propositions 2.23–2.24, printed pp. 66–68, proves the even-cell additive calculation and the tautological-line ring presentation by relative products. The additive exact-couple computation above uses only actual finite K-pair sequences and the even-cell support; it requires no general multiplicative AHSS theorem.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

Complex K-AHSS for a closed oriented surface

Example

Assume AC. Let Sg be a closed connected oriented surface of genus g0. Then K0(Sg)Z2,K1(Sg)Z2g.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. The K-AHSS has E2p,q=Hp(Sg;Z) for even q, zero for odd q, and dr:Erp,qErp+r,qr+1 (Complex K-theory AHSS).

[A2]

The integral cohomology of Sg is Z in degrees 0 and 2, Z2g in degree 1, and zero in all other degrees; the cohomology is free in every degree.

[A3]

A finite filtration of free abelian groups whose successive quotients are free splits: the group is the direct sum of its graded pieces. This is the standard splitting of extensions of free abelian groups and requires no choice.

[A4]

Collapse determines only the associated graded object, so a splitting argument is needed for the extensions (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, a closed connected oriented surface Sg, and its K-AHSS.

1.1

By [A2] the page E2 has nonzero entries H0,H1,H2 in each even coefficient row, all free abelian, and vanishes in odd coefficient rows.

A1A2
2.1

Every differential dr with r2 has target in the odd coefficient row qr+1 when r is even, and in the column p+r>2 when r is odd; since the odd coefficient rows and the columns above the surface dimension 2 vanish, all differentials dr for r2 vanish. The first differential is the cellular coboundary, so E2 is already the cohomology page by construction.

A1A2step 1.1
3.1

The stable page has graded pieces Z in total degree zero for the rows contributing H0 and H2, and Z2g in total degree one from H1, so the associated graded of K0 is Z2 and that of K1 is Z2g.

A1A2step 2.1
4.1

Since all graded pieces are free, the finite filtrations split by [A3], so K0(Sg)Z2ZK~0(Sg) with K~0(Sg)Z and K1(Sg)Z2g; the extension data are not inferred from the collapse but from the splitting of free extensions.

A3A4step 3.1
5.1

This verifies the displayed groups K0Z2 and K1Z2g.

step 4.1

Source notes

Compare Ji, §3.2.1, printed pp. 10–11, for the surface computation in the K-AHSS.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

Complex K-AHSS for real projective space

Example

Assume AC. For m0, K~0(RP2m)Z/2m,K1(RP2m)=0, and K~0(RP2m+1)Z/2m,K1(RP2m+1)Z. For m2, the repeated Z/2 graded pieces of the collapsed page form a nonsplit extension; for m=0 there is no torsion piece, and for m=1 there is a single Z/2 piece and hence no nontrivial additive extension.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. The K-AHSS of RPr has E2p,q=Hp(RPr;Z) for even q and zero for odd q, with all differentials zero (every target lies in an odd degree below r or in the top degree with a torsion source, and the 0-column survives by the rank of its edge); the integral cohomology is Z in degree 0, Z/2 in the even positive degrees below r, zero in the odd degrees below r, and Z in degree r for odd r, Z/2 for even r (Complex K-theory AHSS, the standard universal-coefficient computation).

[A2]

Assume AC. The complexified tautological line ξ has α=[ξ]1 with α2=2α, exact order 2m, and K~0(RPr)=Zα; the odd groups are K1(RP2m)=0 and K1(RP2m+1)Z (The complexified tautological line resolves real-projective K-theory extensions).

[A3]

Collapse alone determines only the associated graded; the cyclic structure is genuine extension data (AHSS collapse generally determines only the associated graded object, Multiplicative AHSS for a multiplicative generalized theory).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, m0, and the K-AHSS of RPr for r=2m or r=2m+1.

1.1

By [A1] the stable page has one Z/2 in each even cohomological degree 2,4, up to the dimension and, for odd r, an extra Z in the top degree; all differentials vanish, so these are the graded pieces of K(RPr).

A1
2.1

The graded pieces in total degree zero are m copies of Z/2 together with the Z from degree zero; the associated graded of K~0 is therefore (Z/2)m of order 2m.

A1step 1.1
3.1

By [A2] the class α has exact order 2m and generates K~0(RPr), so the m copies of Z/2 assemble into the single cyclic group Z/2m. For m2 this is a nonsplit extension because (Z/2)m is not cyclic; for m=0 the reduced group is zero, and for m=1 it is the lone graded piece Z/2. The odd-degree statement is the corresponding clause of [A2].

A2A3step 2.1
4.1

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 verify the displayed groups and identify exactly when a nonsplit extension occurs.

step 1.1step 3.1

Source notes

Compare Ji, §3.2.3, printed pp. 10–11, for the vanishing of the differentials and the warning that the spectral sequence alone does not determine the torsion group.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-22Open item page →

A nonzero d-three in the K-AHSS for RP-two times RP-four

Example

Assume AC. In the complex K-theory Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence for RP2×RP4, let u and v be the degree-one mod-two generators and let z=βZ(uv)H3(;Z). Then d3(z)=βZ(uv4)0; equivalently d3 agrees with βSq2ρ2 on this class. No complex K-theory Künneth theorem or group-order argument is used.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. In the complex K-AHSS, d2=0 and d3=βZSq2ρ2 on all even coefficient rows (The first possible complex K-theory AHSS differential is integral Sq-three).

[A2]

Assume AC. For u,v the degree-one mod-two generators one has βZSq2ρ2(βZ(uv))=βZ(uv4)0 (A Bockstein class on RP-two times RP-four has nonzero integral Sq-three).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, the space RP2×RP4, its K-AHSS, and z=βZ(uv)H3(;Z).

1.1

The class z lies in E33,2: the coefficient row 2 is even and H3 is the integral cohomology degree of the target, and by [A1] the differential d3 on this row is the operation βZSq2ρ2.

A1given
2.1

By [A2] the value of that operation on z=βZ(uv) is βZ(uv4)0.

A2step 1.1
3.1

Therefore d3(z)=βZ(uv4) is nonzero, which exhibits a nonzero d3 and shows that the K-AHSS does not collapse for this space.

A1step 2.1
4.1

Steps 1.1 and 3.1 verify the displayed nonzero value of d3 without using a K-theory Künneth theorem.

step 3.1

Source notes

Compare Ji, §3.2.4, Figure 2 and Proposition 3.12, printed pp. 11–12, for the nonzero d3 on RP2×RP4.

Sources