Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Homological Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence

Statement

Let X be a finite CW complex and h~ a reduced generalized homology theory. Use the cofiber pair groups hn(B,A)=h~n(CA+B+) and their natural connecting maps, with hn(B)=h~n(B+). Set Xp= for p<0. There is a homological spectral sequence with Ep,q1=hp+q(Xp,Xp1),Ep,q2Hp(X;hq()),dr:Ep,qrEpr,q+r1r, and for each total degree n the filtration Fphn(X):=im(hn(Xp)hn(X)) satisfies Ep,qFphp+q(X)/Fp1hp+q(X). The filtration is finite in each total degree: Fphn(X)=0 for p<0 and Fphn(X)=hn(X) for pdimX when X; for empty X all groups and filtration stages are zero. The second-page isomorphism uses the required suspension-compatible cofiber boundary and boundary-normalized cellular coordinates; there is no independently specified connecting map.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Reduced generalized homology has natural cofiber long exact sequences, homotopy invariance, the wedge axiom, and zero groups on a point; hq()=h~q(S0) and iterated suspension identifies the groups of spheres with these coefficients (Reduced generalized homology theory, Coefficient groups of a generalized homology theory).

[F2]

An initial exact couple generates a spectral sequence starting at E1=E with differentials of bidegree (r,r1) and with the subquotient description Ep,qrNp,qr/Bp,qr, where Np,qr=k1(im(ir1:Dpr,q+r1Dp1,q)) and Bp,qr=j(ker(ir1:Dp,qDp+r1,qr+1)) (An exact couple generates a spectral sequence, Exact couple).

[F3]

A homological spectral sequence has square-zero differentials dr:Ep,qrEpr,q+r1r and specified homology identifications H(Er,dr)Er+1 (Homological spectral sequence).

[F4]

The increasing associated graded consists of the quotients Fp/Fp1 of an already given increasing filtration (Associated graded object of a filtered object).

[F5]

CW subcomplex inclusions are cofibrations, their cofibers are equivalent to their based quotients, and collapsing a nonempty CW subcomplex retains the remaining cells with one quotient vertex (Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations, Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient, CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex).

[F6]

Based degree-d maps of positive-dimensional spheres act by d on reduced generalized homology. Cellular boundary coefficients are attaching incidence degrees in dimensions at least two and terminal-minus-initial endpoint coefficients in dimension one; cellular homology computes singular homology (Degree-d sphere maps act by multiplication by d in any generalized theory, Incidence number of two CW cells, Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix, Cellular homology computes singular homology).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The finite CW complex, theory and cofiber pair convention of the statement.

1.1

If X is empty, X+ is a point and every group in question is zero by [F1], proving all assertions in that case. Otherwise put N=dimX. Define Dp,q=hp+q(Xp) and Ep,q=hp+q(Xp,Xp1). Let i be skeletal inclusion, j the pair map and k the pair boundary. The pair exact sequences give imi=kerj, imj=kerk and imk=keri at their respective positions. Their bidegrees are (1,1),(0,0),(1,0), so this is an initial exact couple and [F2] constructs the claimed pages and differentials.

F1F2
1.2

We verify the second page using the suspension-compatible cofiber boundary required by [F1]. Write G=hq(). In column zero, X+0 is a finite wedge of S0's, so E0,q=e0G. For p1, [F5] identifies the skeletal quotient with the finite wedge of oriented p-cell spheres; [F1] initially gives coordinates Ep,q=epG using the specified suspension. For the standard oriented disk pair (Dp,Sp1), its boundary is an isomorphism onto K=ker(hp+q1(Sp1)hp+q1()). Indeed the inclusion of a chosen boundary point makes hm(Sp1)hm(Dp) surjective in every degree, since the disk contracts to that point; the pair exact sequence proves the assertion. For p2, quotienting the chosen boundary point identifies K with h~p+q1(Sp1): the split cofiber sequence S0(Sp1)+(Sp1,s0) proves this, without identifying (Sp1)+ with a based wedge. Use an orientation-preserving identification of the boundary sphere and the specified suspension coordinates to view this disk boundary as an automorphism ap,q:GG. For p=1, K=ker(GG+G) and use the coordinate g(g,g) in initial, terminal order to define the automorphism a1,q.

F1F5
1.3

For fixed (p,q) put n=p+q. Then Np,qr=k1(im(hn1(Xpr)hn1(Xp1))): for r>p the source skeleton is empty, so the image is zero and Np,q=kerk. Likewise Bp,qr=j(ker(hn(Xp)hn(Xp+r1))), and for p+r1N this kernel is ker(hn(Xp)hn(X)).

F1F2
2.1

Naturality for each characteristic disk pair computes jk cell by cell. For p2 its component at a (p1)-cell is the attaching sphere followed by the quotient projection onto that cell. On the reduced kernel just used, this map acts by its degree, by [F6]. This also covers an attaching map that is not based: move its image of one chosen sphere point to the target sphere basepoint along a path and extend that homotopy by the point cofibration [F5]; homotopy invariance gives the same action on the kernel of collapse to a point. Its degree is the incidence number, unchanged by that homotopy. Thus the component is [ep:ep1]ap,q in the initial coordinates. For p=1, naturality sends (a1,qg,a1,qg) to the initial and terminal vertices; when these coincide the sum is zero. The component is again the signed endpoint incidence times a1,q. For p=0 the target is zero. Define T0,q=idG and Tp,q=Tp1,qap,q recursively, and change every coordinate in column p by Tp,q. The new differential component is Tp1,q([ep:ep1]ap,q)Tp,q1=[ep:ep1]idG, since group homomorphisms commute with integer multiplication. Hence the row complex is isomorphic to cellular chains with coefficients G.

F1F5F6step 1.2
3.1

Taking homology of that row gives Ep,q2Hp(X;hq()) by [F3] and [F6]; negative columns are zero. Functoriality of the skeletal inclusions proves FpFp+1 directly. For p<0 the source is zero by [F1], and for pN the map is the identity of hn(X). Thus these images really form a finite exhaustive filtration before [F4] is applied.

F1F3F4F6step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

By exactness, kerk=im(j:Dp,q=hn(Xp)Ep,q). Define Φ:kerkFphn(X)/Fp1hn(X) by choosing xhn(Xp) with j(x)=e and sending e to the image of x in hn(X) modulo Fp1. This is well defined because two such lifts differ by kerj=im(hn(Xp1)hn(Xp)), and it is surjective by the definition of Fp. Its kernel is j(ker(hn(Xp)hn(X))): one inclusion is immediate, and if the image of x lies in Fp1, choose yhn(Xp1) with the same image in hn(X); then xi(y) maps to zero in hn(X) and j(x)=j(xi(y)). Thus step 1.3 gives Ep,q=kerk/j(ker(hn(Xp)hn(X)))Fphn(X)/Fp1hn(X).

F1F2F4step 3.1step 1.3
5.1

Steps 1.1, 3.1 and 4.1 give the asserted first and second pages, the bidegree of the differentials and the identification of the stable page with the associated graded of the finite filtration, which proves the theorem.

step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1

Source notes

The cellular differential and finite convergence construction can also be compared with Duke Lecture 13, proof of Theorem 1.1, pp. 1–3. That source treats spectrum homology. Steps 1.2 and 2.1 above spell out the cellular coordinates under the required suspension-compatible cofiber boundary and keep the orientation choices explicit.

Compare Davis–Kirk, Theorem 9.6, printed pp. 242–243, for the bidegree (r,r1) and the finite skeletal convergence statement, and Miller, Lecture 26, printed pp. 89–92, for the exact-couple filtration conventions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources