How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homological Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence
Statement
Let be a finite CW complex and a reduced generalized homology theory. Use the cofiber pair groups and their natural connecting maps, with . Set for . There is a homological spectral sequence with and for each total degree the filtration satisfies The filtration is finite in each total degree: for and for when ; for empty all groups and filtration stages are zero. The second-page isomorphism uses the required suspension-compatible cofiber boundary and boundary-normalized cellular coordinates; there is no independently specified connecting map.
Facts & Assumptions
Reduced generalized homology has natural cofiber long exact sequences, homotopy invariance, the wedge axiom, and zero groups on a point; and iterated suspension identifies the groups of spheres with these coefficients (Reduced generalized homology theory, Coefficient groups of a generalized homology theory).
An initial exact couple generates a spectral sequence starting at with differentials of bidegree and with the subquotient description , where and (An exact couple generates a spectral sequence, Exact couple).
A homological spectral sequence has square-zero differentials and specified homology identifications (Homological spectral sequence).
The increasing associated graded consists of the quotients of an already given increasing filtration (Associated graded object of a filtered object).
CW subcomplex inclusions are cofibrations, their cofibers are equivalent to their based quotients, and collapsing a nonempty CW subcomplex retains the remaining cells with one quotient vertex (Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations, Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient, CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex).
Based degree- maps of positive-dimensional spheres act by on reduced generalized homology. Cellular boundary coefficients are attaching incidence degrees in dimensions at least two and terminal-minus-initial endpoint coefficients in dimension one; cellular homology computes singular homology (Degree-d sphere maps act by multiplication by d in any generalized theory, Incidence number of two CW cells, Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix, Cellular homology computes singular homology).
Proof
Given: The finite CW complex, theory and cofiber pair convention of the statement.
If is empty, is a point and every group in question is zero by [F1], proving all assertions in that case. Otherwise put . Define and . Let be skeletal inclusion, the pair map and the pair boundary. The pair exact sequences give , and at their respective positions. Their bidegrees are , so this is an initial exact couple and [F2] constructs the claimed pages and differentials.
We verify the second page using the suspension-compatible cofiber boundary required by [F1]. Write . In column zero, is a finite wedge of 's, so . For , [F5] identifies the skeletal quotient with the finite wedge of oriented -cell spheres; [F1] initially gives coordinates using the specified suspension. For the standard oriented disk pair , its boundary is an isomorphism onto . Indeed the inclusion of a chosen boundary point makes surjective in every degree, since the disk contracts to that point; the pair exact sequence proves the assertion. For , quotienting the chosen boundary point identifies with : the split cofiber sequence proves this, without identifying with a based wedge. Use an orientation-preserving identification of the boundary sphere and the specified suspension coordinates to view this disk boundary as an automorphism . For , and use the coordinate in initial, terminal order to define the automorphism .
For fixed put . Then : for the source skeleton is empty, so the image is zero and . Likewise , and for this kernel is .
Naturality for each characteristic disk pair computes cell by cell. For its component at a -cell is the attaching sphere followed by the quotient projection onto that cell. On the reduced kernel just used, this map acts by its degree, by [F6]. This also covers an attaching map that is not based: move its image of one chosen sphere point to the target sphere basepoint along a path and extend that homotopy by the point cofibration [F5]; homotopy invariance gives the same action on the kernel of collapse to a point. Its degree is the incidence number, unchanged by that homotopy. Thus the component is in the initial coordinates. For , naturality sends to the initial and terminal vertices; when these coincide the sum is zero. The component is again the signed endpoint incidence times . For the target is zero. Define and recursively, and change every coordinate in column by . The new differential component is , since group homomorphisms commute with integer multiplication. Hence the row complex is isomorphic to cellular chains with coefficients .
Taking homology of that row gives by [F3] and [F6]; negative columns are zero. Functoriality of the skeletal inclusions proves directly. For the source is zero by [F1], and for the map is the identity of . Thus these images really form a finite exhaustive filtration before [F4] is applied.
By exactness, . Define by choosing with and sending to the image of in modulo . This is well defined because two such lifts differ by , and it is surjective by the definition of . Its kernel is : one inclusion is immediate, and if the image of lies in , choose with the same image in ; then maps to zero in and . Thus step 1.3 gives .
Steps 1.1, 3.1 and 4.1 give the asserted first and second pages, the bidegree of the differentials and the identification of the stable page with the associated graded of the finite filtration, which proves the theorem.
Source notes
The cellular differential and finite convergence construction can also be compared with Duke Lecture 13, proof of Theorem 1.1, pp. 1–3. That source treats spectrum homology. Steps 1.2 and 2.1 above spell out the cellular coordinates under the required suspension-compatible cofiber boundary and keep the orientation choices explicit.
Compare Davis–Kirk, Theorem 9.6, printed pp. 242–243, for the bidegree and the finite skeletal convergence statement, and Miller, Lecture 26, printed pp. 89–92, for the exact-couple filtration conventions.
Depends on
- Reduced generalized homology theory
- Coefficient groups of a generalized homology theory
- An exact couple generates a spectral sequence
- Exact couple
- Homological spectral sequence
- Associated graded object of a filtered object
- Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations
- Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient
- CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex
- Degree-d sphere maps act by multiplication by d in any generalized theory
- Incidence number of two CW cells
- Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix
- Cellular homology computes singular homology
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Davis–Kirk, Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology, Theorem 9.6, printed pp. 242–243 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Haynes Miller, MIT 18.906 Algebraic Topology II, Lecture 26, printed pp. 89–92 (standard reference, not scraped)