Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Degree-d sphere maps act by multiplication by d in any generalized theory

Statement

Give Sp for p1 its CW structure with the basepoint as sole vertex and one p-cell, and give finite wedges the corresponding wedge structure. Let p1, let f:SpSp be a based continuous map of degree dZ in the sense of Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere, and let h~ be a reduced generalized homology theory (Reduced generalized homology theory) and g~ a reduced generalized cohomology theory (Reduced generalized cohomology theory) on based CW complexes. Then f:h~n(Sp)h~n(Sp),f:g~n(Sp)g~n(Sp) are multiplication by d for every integer n. For p=0 the only based self-maps of S0 (with its discrete CW structure) are the identity and the collapse map, and they induce identity and zero respectively. If one calls these integers their degrees, this uses reduced H0(S0;Z)Z, not the unreduced positive-dimensional definition cited above.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

For r1, degree is an isomorphism πr(Sr,b)Z sending the identity to 1; the group operation is the oriented pinch sum, equivalently cubical concatenation, and two based self-maps of Sr are based homotopic if and only if their degrees agree (Based sphere maps are classified by degree).

[F2]

For p1, homological degree is defined by f[Sp]=d[Sp] in Hp(Sp;Z)Z (Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere).

[F3]

A reduced generalized homology theory has based homotopy invariance, and for a finite wedge the summand inclusions induce an isomorphism αh~n(Xα)h~n(αXα) (Reduced generalized homology theory).

[F4]

A reduced generalized cohomology theory has based homotopy invariance, and for a finite wedge the summand inclusions induce an isomorphism g~n(αXα)αg~n(Xα) (Reduced generalized cohomology theory).

[F5]

The wedge is the quotient of the disjoint union of the summands identifying their basepoints, and the structural maps of a wedge are the summand inclusions and collapses (The wedge of a family of pointed spaces).

[F6]

Integral singular homology is homotopy invariant and computed naturally by cellular chains; the reduced sphere groups have their usual generator, including reduced H0(S0)=Z (Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology, Cellular homology computes singular homology, Homology of spheres).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: A based degree-d map f:SpSp, p1, and a reduced homology theory h~ and reduced cohomology theory g~.

1.1

All maps used are in the functors' domains. For p1 the skeleton of Sp in each dimension 0k<p is its basepoint and in dimensions kp is the entire sphere. The same description holds for a finite wedge with its common vertex. Every based continuous map among these spaces therefore preserves every skeleton and is cellular. For p=0 every map of the discrete vertex sets is cellular. In particular this applies to f, pinch, fold, wedge inclusions, collapses and wedge maps; the homotopy axiom applies to based homotopies between these cellular endpoints. Let r be the geometric degree in [F1]. Then [f]=r[id] under pinch addition. We compare r with the homological degree d below.

F1F3F4given
1.2

Write P:SpSpSp for the pinch and F:SpSpSp for the fold, so that for based self-maps α,β the pinch sum is represented by F(αβ)P; the two components π1P,π2P are based degree-one maps, hence are based homotopic to the identity.

F1F5given
1.3

For p=0 the only based self-maps are identity and collapse. Identity induces identity by functoriality; collapse factors through a point, whose reduced groups are zero by the empty-wedge clauses of [F3] and [F4], so it induces zero. These are also the integers acting on reduced H0(S0;Z) by [F6]. No degree is defined here using unreduced H0(S0;Z)Z2.

F3F4F6
2.1

For homology, P:h~n(Sp)h~n(SpSp) has components (π1P)=(π2P)=id under the wedge isomorphism of [F3], hence is the diagonal; and F is the sum map because F restricts to the identity on each summand. Therefore (F(αβ)P)=α+β for all based α,β.

F3F5step 1.2
2.2

For cohomology, F is the diagonal and P is the sum map under the wedge isomorphism of [F4], because F restricts to the identity on each summand and the components of P are degree one; therefore (F(αβ)P)=α+β for all based α,β.

F4F5step 1.2
3.1

By step 1.1 and functoriality of h~, f equals the r-fold sum of id in the group End(h~n(Sp)), which is multiplication by r by step 2.1. For negative r, an inverse class has the negative induced map, since adding it to the original class gives a nullhomotopic map, which factors through the zero reduced group of a point. The same observation includes r=0.

F3step 1.1step 2.1
3.2

By step 1.1 and functoriality of g~, f equals the r-fold sum of id in the group End(g~n(Sp)), which is multiplication by r by step 2.2, including r<0: the additive inverse class induces the negative endomorphism since its pinch sum with the original is null and hence induces zero through a point.

F4step 1.1step 2.2
3.3

The same finite pinch calculation in ordinary integral homology identifies the two degree conventions. By [F6], the top homology of a finite wedge of p-spheres is free on the sphere inclusions: its cellular complex has a common vertex, one generator per p-cell, and zero boundary (also for p=1, since both endpoints attach to that vertex). The collapses give the corresponding coordinate projections. Thus pinch is diagonal and fold is addition in top homology, exactly as in step 2.1. Homotopy invariance [F6] and [f]=r[id] give f[Sp]=r[Sp]. By the definition [F2], d=r.

F2F6step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Combining steps 1.3, 3.1 and 3.2 gives the asserted multiplication by the degree on every reduced homology and cohomology group of Sp.

step 1.3step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3

Source notes

Compare Loizides, Lemma 2.3 and Remark 2.2, printed pp. 4–5, where the degree action is proved for cohomology by factoring a positive-degree map through a pinch to a wedge followed by a folding map, with its negative-degree case left to a similar trick. Here pinch additivity proves the inverse-class action explicitly, and the ordinary cellular homology calculation identifies geometric and homological degrees.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources