Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

6 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 6 also cleared it.

Spectra and Stable Homotopy Groups

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

A sequential prespectrum records spaces together with coherent suspension maps. Its stable homotopy groups are explicit colimits of ordinary homotopy groups, so strict maps, homotopies, tail independence, and products can all be checked on representatives without invoking a stable model category.

The sphere prespectrum recovers the classical stable stems because Freudenthal makes its suspension system eventually constant in every nonnegative degree. Shift bookkeeping follows the displayed colimit grading: moving the levels left lowers the stable index, while the right-shifted sequential suspension raises it. Pairings descend to a graded product, and the sphere-coordinate permutations account for the Koszul sign.

This page is intentionally elementary. It does not calculate a positive stable stem or construct Brown representability, replacement functors, localizations, or the stable homotopy category.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Compactly generated based spaces and well-pointed objects

Definition

On this page a based space is a compactly generated weak Hausdorff space X equipped with a chosen point XX. Products are the compactly generated products from the published CGWH convention, and every quotient is kified after taking the ordinary quotient.

A based space X is well-pointed when the inclusion

{X}X

is an unbased cofibration, in the sense of the published homotopy-extension property. Thus well-pointedness is an additional hypothesis: it is not being asserted for every based CGWH space. The structure spaces of every sequential prespectrum on this page are required to be well-pointed. No choice principle is used in these conventions.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Smash product of based spaces

Definition

Let X and Y be based CGWH spaces. Their wedge inside the k-product is

XY=(X×{Y})({X}×Y)X×kY.

The smash product is the based, kified quotient

XY=k((X×kY)/(XY)),

based at the collapsed wedge. If q:X×kYXY is the quotient map, then the quotient universal property says that a based map XYZ is equivalently a continuous map X×kYZ that is constant with value Z on XY. The kification does not change this test against a CGWH target.

We write xy for q(x,y). No claim that XY is well-pointed is made without further hypotheses.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Canonical associativity, symmetry, and unit maps for smash products

Statement

For based CGWH spaces X,Y,Z, the formulas

(xy)zx(yz),xyyx,

and S0XX, 1xx, induce natural based homeomorphisms

(XY)ZX(YZ),XYYX,S0XX.

These maps satisfy the usual pentagon, triangle, and symmetry coherence identities.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Every product and quotient is formed with the CGWH convention of Smash product of based spaces.

[F2]

The published product-of-quotients lemma identifies an iterated quotient product with the corresponding quotient of the product (Compact-test exponential law and products of quotient maps).

[F3]

The coordinate reassociations and permutations of k-products are mutually inverse homeomorphisms.

Proof

Given: Based CGWH spaces X,Y,Z as in the statement.

1.1

Put both triple smashes over one quotient. Let [F1, F2, F4] W=(X×Y×{Z})(X×{Y}×Z)({X}×Y×Z).

By [F1] and [F2], both (XY)Z and X(YZ) are canonically the kified quotient of X×kY×kZ by W. The identity on triples therefore descends by [F4] to the displayed associator, and the same construction in reverse gives its continuous inverse. [F1, F2, F4]

1.2

Descend the twist and unit maps. The transposition (x,y)(y,x) takes XY onto YX, so [F3, F4] give the symmetry homeomorphism and its inverse. Since the nonbasepoint of S0 is an open-and-closed singleton, collapsing S0X leaves precisely the copy {1}×X, giving S0XX.

F1F3F4
1.3

Check naturality and coherence. Naturality follows because every map above is induced by the corresponding coordinate map before quotienting. Each pentagon, triangle, or symmetry composite is induced by the same reassociation or permutation of the same product coordinates. Those maps agree before quotienting, hence their descended maps agree.

F1

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Sequential prespectra, spectra, and adjoint structure maps

Definition

A sequential prespectrum E consists of well-pointed based CGWH spaces En, indexed by n0, and based structure maps

σn:S1EnEn+1.

The sphere coordinate is always written first. Its adjoint structure map is

σ~n:EnΩEn+1,σ~n(x)(t)=σn(tx).

The loop space carries the compactly generated compact-open topology. The loop--suspension adjunction identifies σn and σ~n.

On this page a spectrum means an Omega-prespectrum: every σ~n is a weak homotopy equivalence. This is terminology in the strict sequential setting only; no stable model structure or replacement functor is part of the definition.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Suspension and sphere prespectra

Definition

For a well-pointed based CGWH space X, its suspension prespectrum is

(ΣX)n=SnX,

where Sn=(S1)n and S0 is the smash unit. Its structure map

S1(SnX)Sn+1X

is the canonical associativity homeomorphism, with the new S1 coordinate placed first. Coherence makes the iterated construction unambiguous.

The sphere prespectrum is

S=ΣS0,Sn=Sn.

These are prespectra. The definition does not assert that an arbitrary suspension prespectrum is an Omega-spectrum.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Strict maps and structure-compatible homotopies of sequential prespectra

Definition

Let E=(En,σn) and F=(Fn,τn) be sequential prespectra. A strict map of prespectra f:EF is a family of based maps fn:EnFn such that, for every n0,

fn+1σn=τn(1S1fn):S1EnFn+1.

A structure-compatible homotopy H:fg is a family of based homotopies Hn:En×IFn satisfying

Hn,0=fn,Hn,1=gn,

and for which every time slice Hn,t is strict:

Hn+1,tσn=τn(1S1Hn,t)(tI).

Thus this page uses the strict level category and this specified notion of homotopy; it does not identify arbitrary zigzags or introduce stable maps.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Stable homotopy groups of a sequential prespectrum

Definition

Fix kZ and choose n00 such that n+k1 whenever nn0. For a sequential prespectrum E, the bonding homomorphism is

bn:πn+k(En)πn+k+1(En+1),[f][σn(1S1f)χ],

where χ:Sn+k+1S1Sn+k is the canonical sphere-coordinate homeomorphism. Equivalently, bn is suspension followed by (σn).

The kth stable homotopy group of E is

πk(E)=colimnn0(πn+k(En),bn).

Concretely this is the disjoint union of the stage groups modulo (n,x)(n+1,bnx). Two representatives are added after advancing both to a common stage. This is well defined because the bn are homomorphisms. After increasing n0 if necessary, all degrees n+k are at least two, so all stage groups and the resulting colimit are abelian. The next lemma proves that the displayed group does not depend on the chosen finite initial cutoff.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Stable homotopy colimits are independent of a cofinal tail

Statement

Let n00, and let An0An0+1An0+2 be the sequential group system used to define a stable homotopy group. For every Nn0, inclusion of the tail induces a canonical group isomorphism

colimnNAn  colimnn0An.

In particular, deleting finitely many legal terms from the system defining πk(E) does not change the resulting group.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

In the disjoint-union quotient model, [n,x]=[m,y] exactly when the two elements have equal images at some common later stage (Stable homotopy groups of a sequential prespectrum).

[F2]

Every finite set of natural-number indices has a common later index.

Proof

Given: The sequential group system, legal initial cutoff n0, and tail index Nn0 in the statement.

1.1

Surjectivity. A class [n,x] in the colimit beginning at n0 has the same value as [N,bN1bnx] if n<N, and already has a representative in the tail if nN. Hence every class comes from the tail.

F1F2
1.2

Injectivity. Suppose two tail representatives have the same image in the colimit beginning at n0. By [F1], their images agree at a common stage r. Replace r by max(r,N) if needed. This witnesses their equality using only the tail relation, so the tail map is injective.

F1
1.3

Group structure and canonicity. The inclusion respects bonding maps, hence respects addition on common-stage representatives. Its inverse is forced by advancing a representative into the tail; [F1] shows that this is independent of the chosen later stage. Thus the isomorphism is canonical.

F1

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Strict prespectrum maps act functorially on stable homotopy groups

Statement

A strict map f:EF of sequential prespectra induces, for every kZ, a homomorphism

πk(f):πk(E)πk(F).

These maps preserve identities and composition. Structure-compatible homotopic strict maps induce the same homomorphism.

In this strict sequential-prespectrum setting, a stable weak equivalence is, by definition, a strict map f for which πk(f) is an isomorphism for every kZ.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Strictness says fn+1σn=τn(1S1fn) (Strict maps and structure-compatible homotopies of sequential prespectra).

[F2]

Based homotopic maps induce the same homomorphism on every higher homotopy group (Higher homotopy groups are functorial and based homotopy invariant).

[F3]

Finite-tail deletion gives the canonical colimit isomorphism proved in the preceding lemma (Stable homotopy colimits are independent of a cofinal tail).

Proof

Given: A strict map f:EF and an integer k as in the statement.

1.1

Construct the map of directed systems. Functoriality of higher homotopy gives (fn):πn+k(En)πn+k(Fn). Suspending a representative and using [F1] shows [F1, F2] (fn+1)bnE=bnF(fn).

Thus the level maps form a natural transformation of the two sequential systems. [F1, F2]

2.1

Descend to the colimit. Set πk(f)[n,x]=[n,(fn)x]. The equality in step 1.1 shows that equivalent representatives have equivalent images. Common-stage addition shows this map is a homomorphism. Different legal initial cutoffs give the same map under [F3].

F1F3step 1.1
3.1

Check functoriality and homotopy invariance. Identity and composite formulas hold at every level and hence in the colimit. If H:fg is structure-compatible, then [F2] gives (fn)=(gn) at every stage; their colimit maps are therefore equal. The last paragraph of the statement introduces terminology only. It does not assert a model structure, a replacement theorem, or a criterion involving levelwise equivalences.

F2step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Shift and suspension of sequential prespectra

Definition

For a sequential prespectrum E, its shift is

(shE)n=En+1,

with structure map σn+1:S1En+1En+2. Its sequential suspension (the right-shifted object) is

(sE)0=,(sE)n+1=En,

with the unique structure map out of S1 at level zero and σn1:S1En1En at level n1.

With the grading convention πk(E)=colimnπn+k(En), there are canonical isomorphisms

 πk(shE)πk1(E),πk(sE)πk+1(E). 

Reindexing check

For the shift, put m=n+1 and delete the missing finite initial term:

colimnπn+k(En+1)=colimmπm+(k1)(Em)=πk1(E).

For sE, discard its zero level and put m=n1:

colimn1πn+k(En1)=colimm0πm+(k+1)(Em)=πk+1(E).

The cofinal-tail lemma makes both reindexings canonical. These signs correct the reversed formulas in the Step-1 scaffold.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Stable stems of the sphere

Definition

For kZ, the kth stable stem of the sphere is

πks:=πk(S)=colimnn0πn+k(Sn),

where n0 is any index for which n+k1 thereafter. The bonding map is the suspension homomorphism determined by the sphere-prespectrum structure homeomorphism S1SnSn+1. Tail independence makes the notation independent of n0.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Freudenthal identifies the eventual suspension system for spheres

Statement

For integers k0 and n1, the sphere-system bonding map

E:πn+k(Sn)πn+k+1(Sn+1)

is an isomorphism when n>k+1 and is a surjection when n=k+1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Every based map SjSn with 0j<n is based nullhomotopic, including the path-connectedness assertion at j=0 (Lower-dimensional sphere maps are based nullhomotopic). With the standard two-cell CW structure, Sn is therefore (n1)-connected for n1.

[F2]

For n1, Freudenthal says that suspension πi(X)πi+1(ΣX) is an isomorphism for 1i<2n1 and a surjection for i=2n1 when X is an (n1)-connected based CW complex. In degree zero it instead gives a bijection of the two singleton pointed sets (Freudenthal suspension theorem).

[F3]

The stable-stem definition uses the reduced-suspension bonding map determined by S1SnSn+1 (Stable stems of the sphere).

[F4]

Collapsing a nonempty contractible CW subcomplex is a weak homotopy equivalence (CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex).

Proof

Given: Integers k0 and n1.

1.1

Apply [F2] to X=Sn using [F1] and set i=n+k. The isomorphism inequality becomes [F1, F2] n+k<2n1n>k+1.

F1F2
1.2

The endpoint equation n+k=2n1 is exactly n=k+1, so [F2] gives the claimed surjection there and makes no injectivity claim.

F2
2.1

The quotient from the two-cone suspension to the reduced suspension collapses precisely the basepoint track, a nonempty contractible CW subcomplex. By [F4] it induces an isomorphism on the displayed homotopy group, while [F3] identifies the resulting reduced-suspension map with the sphere-system bonding map. Thus the computed range applies to that system itself.

F3F4step 1.1step 1.2
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The sphere prespectrum groups are the classical stable stems

Statement

For every k0, πk(S) is canonically isomorphic to the eventual value of

πn+k(Sn)Eπn+k+1(Sn+1)E.

This eventual group is the classical kth stable homotopy group of spheres.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

For fixed k0, every bonding map after any index N>k+1 is an isomorphism (Freudenthal identifies the eventual suspension system for spheres).

[F2]

The stable-stem definition is the colimit of the sphere suspension system and records its finite-tail independence (Stable stems of the sphere).

Proof

Given: A fixed integer k0.

1.1

Choose N>k+1. By [F1], every map in the tail beginning at N is an isomorphism. Sending xπN+k(SN) to its colimit class is surjective, since every later representative can be transported back uniquely through the intervening isomorphisms.

F1
1.2

If two elements at stage N have the same colimit class, their images agree at a later stage. The composite from stage N to that stage is an isomorphism by [F1], so the original elements agree. The stage-N map is therefore injective.

F1
2.1

Changing N replaces this isomorphism by transport through canonical bonding isomorphisms; [F2] shows that all choices identify the same colimit. By the definition of the sphere prespectrum and the stable stem, that colimit is πk(S)=πks.

F1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Pairings and unital multiplication of sequential prespectra

Definition

Let E,F,G be sequential prespectra, with structure maps denoted σE,σF,σG. A pairing EFG is a family of based maps

μm,n:EmFnGm+n

together with based homotopies making it compatible with each structure coordinate. Suppressing only the canonical associators, the two required comparisons are

μm+1,n(σmE1)σm+nG(1S1μm,n)

on S1EmFn, and

μm,n+1(1σnF)σm+nG(1S1μm,n)(τEm,S11)

on EmS1Fn. Here τEm,S1 moves the new suspension coordinate past Em; this twist is part of the formula, not an implicit sign.

A unital multiplication on E is such a pairing EEE, a based unit η:S0E0, and specified compatible homotopies from the two unit composites to the identity and between μ(μ1) and μ(1μ), with the canonical associators inserted. A commutativity datum additionally gives compatible comparison homotopies between μm,n and μn,mτEm,En, including the permutation of the m and n suspension-coordinate blocks. That block permutation has degree (1)mn on Sm+n. All homotopies are required to respect the two displayed structure comparisons.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

A ring prespectrum gives a graded product on stable homotopy groups

Statement

Let E be a sequential prespectrum with a unital multiplication. If xπp(E) and yπq(E) are represented at stages m,n by

f:Sm+pEm,g:Sn+qEn,

then the smash fg, followed by μm,n and the canonical sphere coordinate rearrangement, defines a product

πp(E)×πq(E)πp+q(E).

It is well defined, associative, and unital. If the multiplication has the commutativity datum of the preceding definition, then

xy=(1)pqyx.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The pairing has both displayed structure-compatibility homotopies; the second includes the suspension-coordinate twist (Pairings and unital multiplication of sequential prespectra).

[F2]

Smash associators, twists, and units are coherent canonical homeomorphisms (Canonical associativity, symmetry, and unit maps for smash products).

[F3]

The commutativity datum includes the level-block permutation, whose degree is (1)ab for blocks of dimensions a,b (Pairings and unital multiplication of sequential prespectra).

Proof

Given: A unital ring prespectrum E and stable classes x,y represented as in the statement.

1.1

Define the product on representatives. Use [F2] to identify Sm+n+p+q with Sm+pSn+q in the fixed order, then set [F1] [f][g]=[μm,n(fg)]πm+n+p+q(Em+n).

F1

Changing f or g through a based homotopy changes this composite through a based homotopy.

1.2

Check the colimit relation. Advance f once. The first comparison in [F1] homotopes the resulting composite to the one-fold suspension of the product. Advancing g once gives the same conclusion from the second comparison; its explicit twist is exactly the coordinate rearrangement needed to put the new S1 at the front. Hence replacing either representative by a bonding-map representative does not change the colimit class. Repetition and common-stage comparison prove full well-definedness.

F1
1.3

Associativity and the unit. For three representatives, the two products are the two composites μ(μ1) and μ(1μ) after the same canonical reassociation of sphere coordinates. The specified associativity homotopy and [F2] identify them. The class of η:S0E0 is a two-sided identity by the two unit homotopies.

F1
1.4

Compute the commutativity sign. Compare the two representative maps after putting both in one fixed order: degree coordinates p,q followed by level coordinates m,n. The parity contributions are [F1] (m+p)(n+q)(swap the two full source blocks), mn(the target level-block permutation),mq+np(restore the fixed stable ordering).

F1

By [F3] their sum modulo two is (m+p)(n+q)+mn+mq+nppq. The commutativity homotopy therefore gives xy=(1)pqyx, independent of the chosen stages.

RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Scope boundary for stable homotopy theory

Remark

This page proves no value of a positive stable stem. It also does not prove Brown representability, a stable model structure, a fibrant or cofibrant replacement theorem, localization at stable weak equivalences, or the existence of a stable homotopy category.

Here stable weak equivalence means only the definition already given for a strict map: isomorphism on πk for every kZ. That condition must not be silently replaced by levelwise homotopy equivalence, strict levelwise homotopy, or invertibility in an unconstructed category.

Later pages may use the sequential-prespectrum definitions, their colimit groups, the corrected shift bookkeeping, and products arising from explicit pairings. Any use of replacement, localization, Brown representability, or a calculated positive sphere stem needs a separate supplier.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources