Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Freudenthal identifies the eventual suspension system for spheres

Statement

For integers k0 and n1, the sphere-system bonding map

E:πn+k(Sn)πn+k+1(Sn+1)

is an isomorphism when n>k+1 and is a surjection when n=k+1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Every based map SjSn with 0j<n is based nullhomotopic, including the path-connectedness assertion at j=0 (Lower-dimensional sphere maps are based nullhomotopic). With the standard two-cell CW structure, Sn is therefore (n1)-connected for n1.

[F2]

For n1, Freudenthal says that suspension πi(X)πi+1(ΣX) is an isomorphism for 1i<2n1 and a surjection for i=2n1 when X is an (n1)-connected based CW complex. In degree zero it instead gives a bijection of the two singleton pointed sets (Freudenthal suspension theorem).

[F3]

The stable-stem definition uses the reduced-suspension bonding map determined by S1SnSn+1 (Stable stems of the sphere).

[F4]

Collapsing a nonempty contractible CW subcomplex is a weak homotopy equivalence (CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex).

Proof

Given: Integers k0 and n1.

1.1

Apply [F2] to X=Sn using [F1] and set i=n+k. The isomorphism inequality becomes [F1, F2] n+k<2n1n>k+1.

F1F2
1.2

The endpoint equation n+k=2n1 is exactly n=k+1, so [F2] gives the claimed surjection there and makes no injectivity claim.

F2
2.1

The quotient from the two-cone suspension to the reduced suspension collapses precisely the basepoint track, a nonempty contractible CW subcomplex. By [F4] it induces an isomorphism on the displayed homotopy group, while [F3] identifies the resulting reduced-suspension map with the sphere-system bonding map. Thus the computed range applies to that system itself.

F3F4step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources