The Formal Laurent Series Field : Cauchy Complete, Non-Archimedean, Not Complete
About this page
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 9 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Real Analysis
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Definition
The formal Laurent series ℝ((t⁻¹)): support bounded below, valuation, leading coefficient
Lemma
ℝ((t⁻¹)) is a commutative ring: the product is a finite sum and both operations preserve support bounded below
Lemma
Valuation and leading coefficient in ℝ((t⁻¹)): v(fg) = v(f) + v(g), and the behaviour of v under sums
Theorem
ℝ((t⁻¹)) is a field: every nonzero formal Laurent series is invertible
Theorem
ℝ((t⁻¹)) is an ordered field, ordered by the sign of the leading coefficient
Lemma
ℝ((t⁻¹)) is non-Archimedean, and the monomials t⁻ᵏ are cofinal below its positive elements
Corollary
ℝ((t⁻¹)) does not have the least-upper-bound property; its canonical naturals have no supremum
Definition
Sequences, convergence, Cauchyness, monotonicity, boundedness and closed intervals in an arbitrary ordered field
Theorem
Every Cauchy sequence in ℝ((t⁻¹)) converges: K is sequentially Cauchy complete
Corollary
ℝ((t⁻¹)) has the nested interval property for lengths tending to 0
Counterexample
The unrestricted nested interval property fails in ℝ((t⁻¹))
Sources
- Formal power series (Wikipedia)
- Hahn series (Wikipedia)
- Ordered field (Wikipedia)
- B. Sambale, An invitation to formal power series
- H. G. Dales, Norming infinitesimals of large fields
- Valuation (algebra) (Wikipedia)
- Laurent series (Encyclopedia of Mathematics)
- Archimedean property (Wikipedia)
- Complete ordered fields are Archimedean (Rutgers Math 311 notes)
- Cauchy sequence (Wikipedia)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1
- Cauchy sequences in ordered fields (University of Tennessee notes)
- Complete field (Wikipedia)
- Nested intervals (Wikipedia)
- Cantor theorem (Encyclopedia of Mathematics)