Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

R((t1))\mathbb{R}((t^{-1})) is a commutative ring: the product is a finite sum and both operations preserve support bounded below

Statement

Let K=R((t1))K = \mathbb{R}((t^{-1})) be as in The formal Laurent series R((t1))\mathbb{R}((t^{-1})): support bounded below, valuation, leading coefficient, and let f,gKf, g \in K, with m,nZm, n \in \mathbb{Z} chosen so that f(i)=0f(i) = 0 for all i<mi < m and g(j)=0g(j) = 0 for all j<nj < n. Then:

  1. (Finiteness.) For every kZk \in \mathbb{Z} the set Sk:={(i,j)Z×Z:i+j=k,  f(i)g(j)0}S_k := \{\, (i,j) \in \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} : i + j = k,\; f(i)g(j) \ne 0 \,\} is finite, so (fg)(k)=i+j=kf(i)g(j)(fg)(k) = \sum_{i+j=k} f(i)g(j) is a finite sum of reals; and Sk=S_k = \varnothing whenever k<m+nk < m + n.
  2. (Closure.) f+gf + g, f-f and fgfg lie in KK, with (f+g)(k)=0(f+g)(k) = 0 for k<min(m,n)k < \min(m,n) and (fg)(k)=0(fg)(k) = 0 for k<m+nk < m + n.
  3. (Ring.) (K,+,,0K,1K)(K, +, \cdot\,, 0_K, 1_K) is a commutative ring with identity, and 1K0K1_K \ne 0_K.
  4. (Monomials and constants.) (tah)(k)=h(ka)(t^{-a}h)(k) = h(k-a) for every hKh \in K and all a,kZa, k \in \mathbb{Z}; consequently tatb=t(a+b)t^{-a} \, t^{-b} = t^{-(a+b)} for all a,bZa, b \in \mathbb{Z}. Moreover (ι(c)f)(k)=cf(k)(\iota(c)f)(k) = c\, f(k) for all cRc \in \mathbb{R} and kZk \in \mathbb{Z}.
  5. (Least element.) Every nonempty SZS \subseteq \mathbb{Z} that is bounded below has a least element. In particular suppf\operatorname{supp} f has a least element whenever f0Kf \ne 0_K, so the valuation v(f)v(f) and the leading coefficient lc(f)\operatorname{lc}(f) of The formal Laurent series R((t1))\mathbb{R}((t^{-1})): support bounded below, valuation, leading coefficient are defined.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: KK, its operations, 0K0_K, 1K1_K, the monomials tnt^{-n} and the constants ι(c)\iota(c) as in The formal Laurent series R((t1))\mathbb{R}((t^{-1})): support bounded below, valuation, leading coefficient; elements f,gKf, g \in K and bounds m,nZm, n \in \mathbb{Z} with f(i)=0f(i) = 0 for i<mi < m and g(j)=0g(j) = 0 for j<nj < n.

[L1]

KK consists of the functions ZR\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{R} whose support is bounded below; (f+g)(k)=f(k)+g(k)(f+g)(k) = f(k) + g(k) and (fg)(k)=i+j=kf(i)g(j)(fg)(k) = \sum_{i+j=k} f(i)g(j); 0K0_K is the zero function, 1K1_K is 11 at index 00 and 00 elsewhere, tat^{-a} is 11 at index aa and 00 elsewhere, and ι(c)\iota(c) is cc at index 00 and 00 elsewhere (The formal Laurent series R((t1))\mathbb{R}((t^{-1})): support bounded below, valuation, leading coefficient).

[L2]

Z\mathbb{Z} is a totally ordered commutative ring: its order is total, and xyx \le y implies x+zy+zx + z \le y + z (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers, Arithmetic on the integers).

[L3]

Every nonempty subset of N\mathbb{N} has a least element (The well-ordering principle).

[L4]

The map ε(a)=[(a,0)]\varepsilon(a) = [(a,0)] is injective from N\mathbb{N} onto the set of nonnegative integers and preserves addition and order, so every integer x0x \ge 0 is ε(a)\varepsilon(a) for a unique natural aa (The naturals embed in the integers).

[L5]

R\mathbb{R} is a field: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, multiplication distributes over addition, 010 \ne 1, and a finite sum of reals is independent of the order and bracketing of its terms (Field, The reals form a totally ordered field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let SZS \subseteq \mathbb{Z} be nonempty with sbs \ge b for all sSs \in S. Every element of T:={sb:sS}T := \{\, s - b : s \in S \,\} is a nonnegative integer, so by [L4] T={ε(a):aA}T = \{\, \varepsilon(a) : a \in A \,\} for a nonempty ANA \subseteq \mathbb{N}; by [L3] AA has a least element a0a_0, and since ε\varepsilon preserves order and xx+bx \mapsto x + b preserves order, ε(a0)+b\varepsilon(a_0) + b is an element of SS that is \le every element of SS.

L2L3L4
1.2

Fix kZk \in \mathbb{Z} and let (i,j)Sk(i,j) \in S_k. Then f(i)0f(i) \ne 0 and g(j)0g(j) \ne 0, so imi \ge m and jnj \ge n; from i+j=ki + j = k and jnj \ge n we get i=kjkni = k - j \le k - n. Hence miknm \le i \le k - n, and j=kij = k - i is determined by ii.

givenL1L2
2.1

The integers ii with miknm \le i \le k - n are in order-preserving bijection with the naturals aa satisfying ε(a)knm\varepsilon(a) \le k - n - m by [L4], and there are finitely many of these, none at all when knm<0k - n - m < 0; so SkS_k is a finite set by [step 1.2], it is empty whenever k<m+nk < m + n, and therefore (fg)(k)(fg)(k) is a finite sum of reals which is 00 whenever k<m+nk < m + n.

step 1.2L2L4L5
3.1

(f+g)(k)=f(k)+g(k)=0(f+g)(k) = f(k) + g(k) = 0 for every k<min(m,n)k < \min(m,n) and (f)(k)=f(k)=0(-f)(k) = -f(k) = 0 for every k<mk < m, so f+gf + g and f-f have support bounded below; and (fg)(k)=0(fg)(k) = 0 for every k<m+nk < m+n by [step 2.1], so fgfg does too. All three therefore lie in KK.

step 2.1givenL1L5
3.2

(fg)(k)=i+j=kf(i)g(j)=j+i=kg(j)f(i)=(gf)(k)(fg)(k) = \sum_{i+j=k} f(i)g(j) = \sum_{j+i=k} g(j)f(i) = (gf)(k), since the two sums have the same finite index set and their terms agree by commutativity of multiplication in R\mathbb{R}; so multiplication on KK is commutative.

step 2.1L5
3.3

For f,g,hKf, g, h \in K and kZk \in \mathbb{Z}, expanding both ((fg)h)(k)((fg)h)(k) and (f(gh))(k)(f(gh))(k) by [L1] and [L5] gives the sum of f(i)g(j)h(l)f(i)g(j)h(l) over the triples (i,j,l)(i,j,l) with i+j+l=ki + j + l = k and f(i)g(j)h(l)0f(i)g(j)h(l) \ne 0; that set is finite because the argument of [step 1.2] bounds ii, jj and ll from below and hence, as in [step 2.1], from above as well. So multiplication on KK is associative.

step 1.2step 2.1L5
3.4

(f(g+h))(k)=i+j=kf(i)(g(j)+h(j))=i+j=kf(i)g(j)+i+j=kf(i)h(j)=(fg)(k)+(fh)(k)(f(g+h))(k) = \sum_{i+j=k} f(i)\bigl(g(j) + h(j)\bigr) = \sum_{i+j=k} f(i)g(j) + \sum_{i+j=k} f(i)h(j) = (fg)(k) + (fh)(k), all three sums being finite; so multiplication distributes over addition.

step 2.1L5
3.5

For hKh \in K, (tah)(k)=i+j=kta(i)h(j)(t^{-a}h)(k) = \sum_{i+j=k} t^{-a}(i)h(j) has at most one nonzero term, the one with i=ai = a and j=kaj = k - a, so (tah)(k)=h(ka)(t^{-a}h)(k) = h(k-a); taking h=tbh = t^{-b} gives (tatb)(k)=tb(ka)(t^{-a}t^{-b})(k) = t^{-b}(k-a), which is 11 when k=a+bk = a+b and 00 otherwise, that is, tatb=t(a+b)t^{-a}t^{-b} = t^{-(a+b)}.

step 2.1L1
3.6

(ι(c)f)(k)=i+j=kι(c)(i)f(j)(\iota(c)f)(k) = \sum_{i+j=k} \iota(c)(i) f(j) has at most one nonzero term, the one with i=0i = 0 and j=kj = k, so (ι(c)f)(k)=cf(k)(\iota(c)f)(k) = c\,f(k).

step 2.1L1
3.7

(f1K)(k)=i+j=kf(i)1K(j)(f \cdot 1_K)(k) = \sum_{i+j=k} f(i) 1_K(j) has at most one nonzero term, the one with j=0j = 0 and i=ki = k, so (f1K)(k)=f(k)(f \cdot 1_K)(k) = f(k) and f1K=ff \cdot 1_K = f; moreover 1K(0)=10=0K(0)1_K(0) = 1 \ne 0 = 0_K(0), so 1K0K1_K \ne 0_K.

step 2.1L1L5
4.1

Addition on KK is defined index by index, and KK is closed under it and under negation by [step 3.1]; so associativity, commutativity, the law f+0K=ff + 0_K = f and the law f+(f)=0Kf + (-f) = 0_K each hold at every index by the corresponding law in R\mathbb{R}, and (K,+,0K)(K, +, 0_K) is an abelian group.

step 3.1L1L5
5.1

By [step 4.1] addition makes KK an abelian group, by [step 3.2], [step 3.3] and [step 3.7] multiplication is commutative and associative with identity 1K0K1_K \ne 0_K, and by [step 3.4] it distributes over addition; hence KK is a commutative ring with identity.

step 3.2step 3.3step 3.4step 3.7step 4.1
6.1

Clause 1 is [step 2.1], clause 2 is [step 3.1] with [step 2.1], clause 3 is [step 5.1], clause 4 is [step 3.5] and [step 3.6], and clause 5 is [step 1.1] applied to S=suppfS = \operatorname{supp} f, which is nonempty when f0Kf \ne 0_K and bounded below because fKf \in K.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.5step 3.6step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The formal Laurent series ℝ((t⁻¹)): support bounded below, valuation, leading coefficient.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 59 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources