How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Steenrod squares are well-defined and natural
Statement
For every integer , is independent of the cocycle representative and of the chosen coherently carried higher-diagonal system. It is additive and natural for maps of spaces and pairs. Thus
is a natural homomorphism, with the outside-range values fixed to zero by the definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Degree- cocycles and the index .
For , the proposed square is represented by ; for or , it is the zero operation (Steenrod squares from cup-i).
The cup- coboundary formula has the two transposed terms (Cup-i coboundary identity).
The maps are natural (Natural higher diagonal approximations).
They carry chains of a subspace into the tensor square of that subspace (Natural higher diagonal approximations).
Two systems have natural satisfying (Natural higher diagonal approximations).
Proof
If or , [F1] makes the zero homomorphism, so independence, additivity, and naturality are immediate. Hence assume , so . The operation is additive. [F1, F2] Expanding leaves, besides the two individual squares, the cross term . Since are cocycles, [F2] says
Hence the cross term vanishes in cohomology.
The class is independent of the coherently carried system. [F1, F5] Pair with . The term vanishes because is a cocycle, the term is the coboundary of , and the final term is zero because and .
The representing cochains are natural for spaces and pairs. [F3, F4] For , naturality of makes , so the representing cochains agree. For a map of pairs, [F4] makes the same equation descend to relative cochains.
The class is independent of its cocycle representative. [F1, F2, step 1.1] If , expansion and two applications of [F2] give
Indeed the first summand differentiates to the two cross terms, while the last two differentiate to ; all remaining terms occur twice. Negative cup indices are zero, so this calculation also covers the endpoints. Together with steps 1.1--1.3, this proves every assertion. ∎
Depends on
Used by
- Total Steenrod square Definition
- Wu classes of a closed manifold Definition
- Steenrod squares on complex projective space mod two Example
- Steenrod squares on real projective space Example
- Bockstein parity recurrence for Steenrod squares Lemma
- Steenrod normalization, instability, suspension, and top square Proposition
- Adem relations for Steenrod squares Theorem
- Cartan formula for Steenrod squares Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mosher and Tangora, Cohomology Operations and Applications (standard reference, not scraped)