Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Steenrod squares are well-defined and natural

Statement

For every integer k, Sqk is independent of the cocycle representative and of the chosen coherently carried higher-diagonal system. It is additive and natural for maps of spaces and pairs. Thus

Sqk ⁣:Hn(X,A;F2)Hn+k(X,A;F2)

is a natural homomorphism, with the outside-range values fixed to zero by the definition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Degree-n cocycles a,b and the index j=nk.

[F1]

For 0kn, the proposed square is represented by anka; for k<0 or k>n, it is the zero operation (Steenrod squares from cup-i).

[F2]

The cup-i coboundary formula has the two transposed i1 terms (Cup-i coboundary identity).

[F3]

The maps Di are natural (Natural higher diagonal approximations).

[F4]

They carry chains of a subspace into the tensor square of that subspace (Natural higher diagonal approximations).

[F5]

Two systems have natural Ki satisfying DiDi=dKi+Kid+(1+T)Ki1 (Natural higher diagonal approximations).

Proof

technique · explicit polarization and coherent chain homotopy
1.1

If k<0 or k>n, [F1] makes Sqk the zero homomorphism, so independence, additivity, and naturality are immediate. Hence assume 0kn, so j=nk0. The operation is additive. [F1, F2] Expanding (a+b)j(a+b) leaves, besides the two individual squares, the cross term ajb+bja. Since a,b are cocycles, [F2] says

ajb+bja=δ(aj+1b).

Hence the cross term vanishes in cohomology.

1.2

The class is independent of the coherently carried system. [F1, F5] Pair DjDj=dKj+Kjd+(1+T)Kj1 with aa. The dKj term vanishes because aa is a cocycle, the Kjd term is the coboundary of c(aa)Kjc, and the final term is zero because (aa)T=aa and 2=0.

1.3

The representing cochains are natural for spaces and pairs. [F3, F4] For f ⁣:XY, naturality of Dj makes (fafa)DjX=(aa)DjYf#, so the representing cochains agree. For a map of pairs, [F4] makes the same equation descend to relative cochains.

2.1

The class is independent of its cocycle representative. [F1, F2, step 1.1] If a=a+δh, expansion and two applications of [F2] give

ajaaja=δ(aj+1δh+hjδh+hj1h).

Indeed the first summand differentiates to the two a,δh cross terms, while the last two differentiate to (δh)j(δh); all remaining terms occur twice. Negative cup indices are zero, so this calculation also covers the endpoints. Together with steps 1.1--1.3, this proves every assertion. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources