Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Total Steenrod square

Definition

Write ordinary total mod-two cohomology as the graded direct sum

H∗(X;F2)=⨁n≥0Hn(X;F2).

For a homogeneous class x∈Hn(X;F2), its total Steenrod square is

Sq(x):=∑i=0nSqi(x).

For an arbitrary element x=∑nxn of the graded direct sum, define Sq(x)=∑nSq(xn). Both sums are finite: the first by instability and the second by the definition of direct sum. Thus this definition takes values in the same ordinary direct sum; it does not use a completed product. It is generally not degree-preserving.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A space X and a finite-support element of H∗(X;F2).

[F1]

Every square is additive and natural (Steenrod squares are well-defined and natural).

[F2]

Squares vanish above the degree of their input and Sq0 is the identity (Steenrod normalization, instability, suspension, and top square).

[F3]

Squares satisfy the internal Cartan formula, with only finitely many nonzero terms (Cartan formula for Steenrod squares).

Verification

technique · sum the finite Cartan identities
1.1givenF1F2

The definition is well-defined, additive, and natural. For each homogeneous component, [F2] leaves only indices 0≤i≤n. An element of the direct sum has only finitely many homogeneous components, so its total image again has finite degree support. Termwise additivity and naturality follow from [F1]. No rearrangement of an infinite family is involved.

2.1F3step 1.1

The total square is multiplicative. For homogeneous x,y, all sums below are finite, and [F3] gives

Sq(x⌣y)=∑kSqk(x⌣y)=∑i,jSqi(x)⌣Sqj(y)=Sq(x)⌣Sq(y).

Distributivity and the finite homogeneous support in step 1.1 extend this to arbitrary total classes.

2.2F2step 1.1

It preserves the unit. The unit 1∈H0(X;F2) satisfies Sq0(1)=1, and every Sqi(1) with i>0 vanishes by instability. Hence Sq(1)=1.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

The total square sends zero to zero and is unique on the empty-space cohomology group. For the empty space the total group is zero; for the zero class the defining sum is zero. On a point only degree zero survives, and step 2.2 makes the operation the identity, including on the elements zero and one. The endpoints i=0 and i=n are included, while every i>n is zero before summing. Degenerate singular simplices are inherited unchanged from the already well-defined component operations. The construction makes only finite sums and uses no choices, so it assumes no AC. It asserts neither a degreewise endomorphism nor a biconditional.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources