Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

20 results · all verified · 15 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 5 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Complex Topological K Theory and Bott Periodicity

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Complex topological K-theory begins by group-completing complex vector bundles under Whitney sum. Tensor product turns K0(X) into a ring, pullback makes it contravariant and homotopy invariant, and the rank map retains its full locally constant value on disconnected spaces. Reduced and relative groups are then organized by cofibration exactness and suspension.

The central calculation follows Hatcher's clutching proof. Bundles on X×S2 are normalized, uniformly replaced by Laurent clutching data, cleared of negative powers with the Hopf line, reduced to linear families, and split into spectral subbundles. These constructions yield both directions of the product isomorphism K0(X)K0(S2)K0(X×S2), not merely its surjectivity.

With the clutching orientation fixed, β=[γ]1 satisfies β2=0. Multiplication by β gives Bott periodicity, the sphere groups, and the two-periodic multiplicative generalized cohomology theory on finite CW pairs. The unreduced bundle operations and polynomial block reduction are choice-free; every use of stable complementation, exactness, reduced products, or Bott periodicity explicitly carries AC.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The Whitney-sum monoid of complex vector bundles

Definition

For a compact Hausdorff space X, let

VectC(X)

be the set of isomorphism classes of finite-rank complex vector bundles over X. Here a finite-rank bundle is allowed to have locally varying rank: it is a finite disjoint clopen decomposition X=jXj together with a fixed-rank bundle in the sense of Real and complex topological vector bundles over each Xj. Equivalently, its fiber-dimension function is locally constant; compactness of X makes its image finite and its rank fibers clopen. Thus no single global rank is imposed, but the notion is reduced to the library's fixed-rank bundles on finitely many clopen pieces.

Define

[E]+[F]=[EF],0=[0X],

where 0X=X×C0. This is well-defined on isomorphism classes by Bundle maps, sections, subbundles, and isomorphisms and Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles, applied on the finite common refinement of the two rank decompositions. The fiberwise swap, reassociation, and zero maps are bundle isomorphisms, so Whitney sum makes VectC(X) a commutative monoid.

When X=, every total space of a bundle over X is empty. Hence there is one isomorphism class, and VectC() is the one-element monoid.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Complex topological K⁰ by Grothendieck completion

Definition

Let X be compact Hausdorff and put M=VectC(X) as in The Whitney-sum monoid of complex vector bundles. Define

K0(X)=(M×M)/,

where (E,F)(E,F) when there is a finite-rank complex bundle H with

EFHEFH.

Write the class of (E,F) as [E][F]. Addition and inverse are

([E][F])+([E][F])=[EE][FF],([E][F])=[F][E].

This is the Grothendieck group of M. The canonical monoid map MK0(X) sends [E] to [E][0X]. It is universal: for every monoid map u:MA to an abelian group there is a unique homomorphism uˉ:K0(X)A with

uˉ([E][F])=u(E)u(F).

The common-summand relation is exactly what makes this displayed formula independent of the representative.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Equality in K⁰ is stable isomorphism over compact bases

Statement

Assume AC. For a compact Hausdorff space X,

[E][F]=[E][F] in K0(X)

if and only if there is a finite-rank bundle H such that

EFHEFH.

Equivalently, there is an N0 such that

EFεNEFεN.

In particular, [E]=[F] if and only if EεNFεN for some N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff space X, and finite-rank complex bundles E,F,E,F over X.

[F1]

Equality in the Grothendieck group is the common-summand relation (Complex topological K⁰ by Grothendieck completion).

[F2]

Under AC, every finite-rank bundle over a compact Hausdorff base has a finite-rank complement in a trivial bundle (Finite-rank complement theorem over compact Hausdorff bases).

[A1]

AC is used only through [F2] to obtain the complement.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1], the first displayed equality holds exactly when some bundle H satisfies the first stable-isomorphism display. This proves both directions of the first equivalence, including H=0X when no added summand is needed.

F1
2.1

Apply [F2] to H. There are a bundle H and N0 with HHεN. Adding H to both sides of the isomorphism in step 1.1 gives the trivial-stabilization display. Conversely, that display is the relation in step 1.1 with H=εN.

F2A1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Set F=F=0X in the proved equivalence. Then [E]=[F] exactly when EεNFεN for some N, including N=0.

step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Grothendieck ring structure and rank map

Definition

Tensor product distributes over Whitney sum, so it extends through the Grothendieck completion to a commutative unital multiplication on K0(X). On virtual-bundle representatives,

([E][F])([E][F])=[EEFF][EFFE].

The unit is the trivial complex line [ε1]. Together with the addition in Complex topological K⁰ by Grothendieck completion, this makes K0(X) a commutative ring.

Fiber dimension is topologically locally constant. Define the rank map

rk:K0(X)H0(X;Z)

by

rk([E][F])(x)=dimCExdimCFx.

Here singular H0(X;Z) is identified, as in Singular cohomology ring, with integer-valued functions constant on path components. A topologically locally constant rank function is constant along every path and hence defines such a class. Direct sum and tensor product give pointwise addition and multiplication of ranks, so rk is a unital ring homomorphism. No assertion that path components are open is needed.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Reduced complex K-theory

Definition

Let (X,x0) be a based compact Hausdorff space, and let ix0:X select the basepoint. Restriction to the fiber gives a unital ring map

ix0:K0(X)K0()Z,

where complex dimension identifies K0() with Z. The reduced complex K-group is

K~0(X)=kerix0.

Thus a virtual bundle belongs to K~0(X) exactly when its virtual rank is zero on the path component containing x0. Its rank on another component can be different. Since ix0 is a ring homomorphism by Grothendieck ring structure and rank map, K~0(X) is an ideal in K0(X).

The empty space has no basepoint, so this based reduced group is not invoked for X=.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

K⁰ is contravariantly functorial and homotopy invariant

Statement

Assume AC. A continuous map f:XY of compact Hausdorff spaces induces a unital ring map

f:K0(Y)K0(X),

with id=id and (gf)=fg. Homotopic maps induce the same map. If f is based, then f restricts to K~0(Y)K~0(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and continuous maps between compact Hausdorff spaces.

[F1]

Pullback bundles have canonical identity and composite comparisons (Vector-bundle pullback is canonically functorial).

[F2]

Under AC, homotopic maps pull a vector bundle back to isomorphic endpoint bundles (Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback).

[F3]

Grothendieck completion is universal for monoid maps (Complex topological K⁰ by Grothendieck completion), and tensor product defines the ring structure (Grothendieck ring structure and rank map).

[F4]

Reduced K0 is the kernel of restriction to the basepoint (Reduced complex K-theory).

[A1]

AC is used only through the endpoint-isomorphism theorem [F2].

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Pullback sends [E] to [fE] and preserves Whitney sums. By [F3] it extends uniquely to f([E][F])=[fE][fF]. Pullback also preserves tensor products and the trivial line, so this is a unital ring map. The canonical isomorphisms in [F1] give the identity and contravariant composition laws on bundle generators, hence on all virtual classes.

F1F3algebra
2.1

If f0f1, [F2] gives f0Ef1E for every bundle E. The two induced maps therefore agree on all generators and, by the formula in step 1.1, on K0(Y). This is the sole use of AC.

F2A1step 1.1
3.1

If f:(X,x0)(Y,y0) is based, then fix0=iy0. Step 1.1 gives ix0f=iy0, so f carries the kernel in [F4] into the corresponding kernel.

F1F4step 1.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Reduced K-theory exact sequence of a cofibration

Statement

Assume AC. If AX is a closed based cofibration of compact Hausdorff well-pointed CGWH spaces, restriction and quotient induce an exact sequence

K~0(X/A)K~0(X)K~0(A).

Applying the same construction to the successive mapping cones in the fixed cofiber convention gives the exact sequence continuing indefinitely to the left through reduced suspensions. In particular, the statement applies to finite CW pairs; no positive-degree or desuspension groups are asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and a closed based cofibration i:AX as in the statement; write q:XX/A.

[F1]

Reduced K0 is the kernel of basepoint restriction (Reduced complex K-theory) and is contravariantly homotopy invariant (K⁰ is contravariantly functorial and homotopy invariant).

[F2]

The reduced mapping-cone sequence and its reflection signs are fixed in Reduced cone suspension and cofiber sequence.

[F3]

Equality in K0 is equivalent, under AC, to actual isomorphism after a common trivial stabilization (Equality in K⁰ is stable isomorphism over compact bases), and a finite-rank bundle over a compact Hausdorff base has a finite complement (Finite-rank complement theorem over compact Hausdorff bases).

[F5]

Under AC and DC, a compact Hausdorff open cover has a finite subordinate partition of unity (Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a compact Hausdorff space admits a finite subordinate partition of unity).

[F6]

AC supplies every prescribed dependent-choice sequence needed in [F4] and [F5] (AC supplies the dependent-choice instances used in vector-bundle constructions).

[A1]

AC is used in [F3] and, through [F6], in [F4] and [F5].

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since qi is the constant map to the collapsed basepoint, [F1] gives iq=0 on reduced groups. Hence the image of q lies in the kernel of i.

F1
1.2

Let uK~0(X) satisfy iu=0, and let ρu:XZ be its locally constant virtual-rank function. The nonzero-rank locus C=ρu1(Z{0}) is clopen and disjoint from A; put D=XC. Both are compact, and q restricts to a homeomorphism Cq(C), with q(C) clopen in X/A. Thus the summand uC already descends across q, and it remains to descend the zero-rank class uD.

F1algebra
2.1

Write uD=[P][Q]. Refine the finite clopen rank decompositions of P and Q; zero virtual rank says their ranks agree on each piece. Apply [F3]'s complement theorem on every piece and enlarge the finitely many trivial ambient bundles to one common dimension n. The piecewise complements glue to a bundle Q with QQεn, while E=PQ has the constant rank n. Hence uD=[E][εn]. Since iu=0, [F3]'s stable-isomorphism criterion on A allows a further common trivial summand so that EAA×Cn by an actual supplied trivialization τ; rename the enlarged rank as n.

F3A1step 1.2algebrachoose
3.1

Extend the bundle map τ:A×CnEA to a neighborhood of A in D. Concretely, choose finitely many bundle charts over D, express the finitely many frame vectors of τ by bounded real and imaginary coordinate functions on the closed chart pieces, extend those functions by [F4], and combine the local extensions by the finite partition in [F5]. The resulting n sections agree with τ on A. Their exterior product is nonzero on A, so continuity gives an open neighborhood U of A in D on which they are a frame. Thus EU has a trivialization extending τ. Here [F6] discharges the DC hypotheses from the single assumption AC.

F4F5F6A1step 2.1construct
4.1

Form a bundle Eˉ on q(D)=D/A: away from the collapsed point use the charts of E on DA, and over q(U) use the trivialization in step 3.1, identifying every fiber above A with the same copy of Cn. On overlaps the transition matrices are the old continuous ones, expressed in this frame, so the quotient charts glue to a rank-n bundle. Pulling back gives qEˉE over D, with the chosen trivialization over A. Therefore vD=[Eˉ][εn] is reduced at the quotient basepoint and pulls back to uD. On the disjoint clopen part q(C) put vC=((qC)1)(uC). The two virtual bundles assemble over the finite clopen decomposition X/A=q(C)⨿q(D) to a reduced class v with qv=u. This proves keriimq and, with step 1.1, exactness.

F1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra
5.1

Replace i by its mapping-cylinder inclusion, which is a closed cofibration with the same homotopy cofiber. The cone base inside each successive reduced mapping cone is again a closed cofibration of compact Hausdorff well-pointed CGWH spaces. Applying steps 1.1–4.1 at every stage gives exactness at every term. The quotient identifications in [F2] identify the successive quotients with reduced suspensions; using its reflection maps gives exactly the recorded signs Σi, Σq, and thereafter their suspended alternation. Homotopy invariance in [F1] transports exactness across these identifications.

F1F2step 1.1step 4.1
6.1

A finite CW subcomplex inclusion satisfies the stated compactness, Hausdorff, CGWH, well-pointed, and closed-cofibration hypotheses, so the result specializes to finite CW pairs.

step 5.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

External product in complex K-theory

Definition

For compact Hausdorff spaces X and Y, define the external product by

ab=prX(a)prY(b)K0(X×Y).

Equivalently, [E][F] is represented by prXEprYF. Pullback, distributivity, and the ring structure make this a choice-free bilinear map

K0(X)K0(Y)K0(X×Y)

that satisfies (ab)(ab)=aabb.

Assume AC for the reduced clause. If X and Y are based and well-pointed, and aK~0(X) and bK~0(Y), then ab restricts to zero on XY. Exactness for

XYX×YXY

therefore supplies a class in K~0(XY) whose pullback is ab. It is unique: restriction to the wedge is surjective because the two projections extend any pair of reduced classes on its two summands, and the same projection argument after one reduced suspension makes K~0(Σ(X×Y))K~0(Σ(XY)) surjective. In the bi-infinite exact sequence this kills the connecting homomorphism preceding quotient pullback, so quotient pullback is injective. This unique class is also denoted ab and is the reduced external product.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Determinant classifies loops in complex general linear groups

Statement

For every n1, determinant induces an isomorphism

det:π1(GLn(C),I)π1(C×,1)Z.

A based loop whose determinant has winding number k is homotopic through invertible matrices to zdiag(zk,1,,1). This result is choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: an integer n1 and based loops at the identity.

[F1]

Invertible complex matrices form GLn(C) (Invertible matrices and the general linear group GLn(F)). Equip Mn(C)Cn2 with its Euclidean topology and GLn(C) with the subspace topology. The determinant is a polynomial in the matrix entries and hence is continuous.

[F2]

A fibration has the pointed long exact sequence of homotopy groups (Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration).

[F3]

Spheres Sm are simply connected for m2 (Sn is simply connected for every n2).

[F4]

Winding number identifies π1(C×,1) with Z (Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Continuous Gram–Schmidt on the ordered columns writes every AGLn(C) uniquely as A=QR, where QU(n) and R is upper triangular with positive real diagonal. No denominator vanishes because each initial set of columns is independent. The path Q((1t)R+tI) remains invertible and fixes U(n) pointwise, so it is a deformation retraction of GLn(C) onto U(n).

F1constructalgebra
1.2

The last-column map SU(n)S2n1 is locally trivial: near a chosen unit vector, continuous Gram–Schmidt completes that vector together with a fixed nearby frame, and multiplying the first completed vector by the inverse determinant puts the completion in SU(n). Its fiber over the last basis vector is SU(n1). Thus SU(n1)SU(n)S2n1 is a fibration.

constructalgebra
2.1

Since SU(1) is a point, induct simultaneously that SU(n) is path-connected and simply connected. For n2, the sphere S2n1 is path-connected and has trivial fundamental group by [F3]. The pointed low-degree part of [F2], applied to step 1.2, first carries path-connectedness of the fiber and base to SU(n) and then carries the inductive equality π1(SU(n1))=0 and π1(S2n1)=0 to π1(SU(n))=0.

F2F3step 1.2induction
3.1

Determinant U(n)U(1) is a fibration with fiber SU(n) and section s(z)=diag(z,1,,1). By [F2] and step 2.1, det is injective on π1, while the section makes it surjective. Step 1.1 transfers this isomorphism to GLn(C) and C×.

F2step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

If a loop g has determinant winding k, [F4] says detg is homotopic to zzk. Step 3.1 says that g and s(zk) represent the same based homotopy class, which is precisely the displayed diagonal loop. Every construction was finite and explicit, so no choice principle was used.

F4step 3.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²)

Statement

Assume AC. Let γ be the tautological Hopf line on S2=CP1, clutched by g(z)=z in the fixed convention, and put β=[γ]1. Then

K0(S2)Z[β]/(β2),K~0(S2)=Zβ.

Restriction to a point is projection onto the integer summand. The sign of β is tied to the stated clutching convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the two-hemisphere decomposition of S2.

[F1]

Complex bundles on S2 are classified by clutching loops, with g(z)=z defining the tautological Hopf line in the fixed convention (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension, Clutching classifies vector bundles over spheres in the stable range, Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles).

[F2]

Determinant classifies loops in every GLn(C) and sends winding k to diag(zk,1,,1) (Determinant classifies loops in complex general linear groups).

[F3]

Under AC, equality in K0 is equivalent to a common trivial stabilization (Equality in K⁰ is stable isomorphism over compact bases).

[F4]

Tensor product is the K0 multiplication and agrees with the bundle external-product convention (External product in complex K-theory).

[A1]

AC is used only through [F3] and the already propagated AC clause of [F4].

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let E have rank n>0. By [F1] it is clutched by a loop g:S1GLn(C). If k is the winding number of detg, [F2] deforms g to diag(zk,1,,1), so [F1] gives Eγkεn1. The rank-zero bundle is 0S2. Consequently every virtual class is an integral combination of 1 and powers of [γ].

F1F2
1.2

The loops diag(z2,1) and diag(z,z) have the same determinant. By [F2] they are homotopic, and [F1] gives γ2ε1γγ. Hence [γ]22[γ]+1=0, or β2=0. It follows algebraically that [γ]k=(1+β)k=1+kβ for every kZ, since (1+β)1=1β.

F1F2F4algebra
2.1

If a+kβ=0, restriction to a point gives a=0. Then kβ=0 implies [γk]=1 by step 1.2. By [F3], after adding the same trivial bundle, γk and the trivial line are isomorphic. Their stabilized clutching determinants have winding numbers k and 0, so [F2] forces k=0. Thus 1 and β are additively independent. Together with steps 1.1–2.1 this proves the displayed ring presentation.

F2F3A1step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Basepoint restriction sends 1 to 1Z and β=[γ]1 to 0, so its kernel is exactly Zβ. Reversing the hemisphere convention replaces z by z1 and hence γ by γ; step 1.2 gives [γ]1=(1β)1=β.

F1step 1.2step 2.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Normalized clutching data for bundles over X×S²

Statement

Assume AC and let X be compact Hausdorff. Every complex vector bundle on X×S2 is represented, after adding a trivial bundle if necessary, by data [E,f]: two copies of prXE on X×D2 glued along X×S1 by a bundle automorphism f, normalized by f(x,1)=idEx. For a fixed bundle, different choices of normalized hemisphere trivializations give homotopic normalized clutching maps. Homotopies through normalized automorphisms give isomorphic stabilized bundles.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff space X, and a finite-rank complex bundle V on X×S2.

[F1]

Under AC, bundle pullback is invariant under homotopy (Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback).

[F2]

The fixed clutching definition supplies the upper-to-lower convention (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension). Applying the transition-cocycle construction in local charts of E, also with an interval parameter, glues two copies of prXE by an equatorial bundle automorphism and turns a homotopy of such automorphisms into a bundle over the parameter cylinder (Vector bundles are glued from transition cocycles).

[F3]

Under AC, finite complements and common trivial stabilization are available (Finite-rank complement theorem over compact Hausdorff bases, Equality in K⁰ is stable isomorphism over compact bases).

[A1]

AC is used through [F1] and [F3].

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let D+2 and D2 be the closed hemispheres. Each inclusion X×{0}X×D±2 is a homotopy inverse to projection. By [F1], there are bundles E± on X and isomorphisms VX×D±2prXE±. In these trivializations, V is obtained by an equatorial isomorphism f(x,z):(E+)x(E)x.

F1F2A1
2.1

At z=1, f(x,1) is an isomorphism E+E. Identify E with E=E+ by f(x,1)1. In the fixed coefficient convention the transition becomes f(x,1)1f(x,z), which equals the identity at z=1. Thus V=[E,f] with normalized f.

F2step 1.1algebra
3.1

If h± and h± are two normalized hemisphere trivializations of the same bundle, their ratios are maps g±:X×D±2Aut(E) with g±(x,1)=I. The straight contraction of each disk to 1 fixes 1, so composing g± with it gives homotopies to the identity through maps still equal to I at 1. Applying these changing gauges to the equatorial transition gives a homotopy between the two normalized clutching maps.

F2step 2.1construct
4.1

For a virtual class, [F3] complements its negative bundle into a finite trivial bundle and then applies steps 1.1–3.1 to the resulting actual bundle; this is the optional stabilization in the statement.

F3A1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

A normalized homotopy ft glues, by [F2], a bundle on X×S2×I. Its endpoint restrictions are isomorphic by [F1]. The normalization keeps the chosen common bundle and basepoint frame fixed, and adding trivial summands before the homotopy gives the same conclusion for stabilized data.

F1F2A1step 2.1step 4.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Uniform Laurent approximation through bundle automorphisms

Statement

Assume AC. Let X be compact Hausdorff and let f be a normalized automorphism of prXE on X×S1. Then f is homotopic through normalized automorphisms to a finite Laurent-polynomial family in the circle coordinate in local bundle charts. The coefficient endomorphisms vary continuously with x, and a finite partition of unity combines the local approximations. The approximation can be chosen uniformly close enough that the whole straight-line homotopy remains invertible. If two normalized clutching maps are homotopic through normalized automorphisms, normalized Laurent approximations of their endpoints can be joined by a normalized Laurent-polynomial homotopy.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, compact Hausdorff X, a finite-rank complex bundle EX, and normalized f as in the statement.

[F1]

The normalization and clutching conventions are those of Normalized clutching data for bundles over X×S².

[F2]

A continuous map from a nonempty compact Hausdorff space to a uniform space is uniformly continuous (Every continuous map from a nonempty compact Hausdorff space to a uniform space is uniformly continuous).

[F3]

Continuous real functions on a compact interval are Riemann integrable (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion); complex matrix entries are integrated by real and imaginary parts.

[F4]
[A1]

AC is spent through [F5] in the cited partition result; the integrability supplier [F3] is used with its published hypotheses as stated.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix a bundle chart over an open UX whose closure is compact and lies in a larger chart. For an integer N1, use the Fejér kernel KN(t)=N11+eit++ei(N1)t2. It is nonnegative, has integral 2π, and expands as j<N(1j/N)eijt. Entrywise integration in [F3] therefore defines on U the Laurent polynomial pN(x,z)=j<N(1j/N)cj(x)zj, where cj(x)=(2π)1ππf(x,eit)eijtdt. Riemann-sum convergence uniform on compact chart closures makes every cj continuous in x.

F3constructalgebra
2.1

Let M bound the matrix entries of f on the compact chart closure times S1. Given ϵ>0, [F2] supplies δ>0 such that f(x,zeit)f(x,z)<ϵ/2 for t<δ. On tδ, KN(t)(Nsin2(δ/2))1, so the integral of the tail times the bound 2M is below ϵ/2 for all sufficiently large N. Since pNf is the convolution of f(x,zeit)f(x,z) with KN/(2π), the short-arc and tail estimates prove pNf uniformly on that chart closure.

F2step 1.1algebra
3.1

Choose finitely many such charts and a finite subordinate partition {ϕi} by [F4]. In chart i, choose a Laurent approximant pi within a common tolerance. The section ϕipi of End(E) has support inside its chart and extends by zero; hence p=iϕipi is a global finite Laurent polynomial in z. Because iϕi=1, the same tolerance bounds pf globally.

F4F5A1step 2.1constructalgebra
4.1

The automorphisms form an open subbundle of End(E): in a chart, invertibility is the open condition det0. Compactness of X×S1 and the finite chart cover give a positive tolerance such that every section within that tolerance of f is invertible, and every convex combination with f remains within it. Choose p accordingly. Since f(x,1)=I, p(x,1) is invertible; put q(x,z)=p(x,z)p(x,1)1. Then q is still Laurent polynomial, is normalized, and can be made arbitrarily close to f.

F1step 3.1algebra
5.1

The straight-line family hs=(1s)f+sq consists of automorphisms by step 4.1, depends continuously on (x,z,s), and satisfies hs(x,1)=I for every s. It is the required normalized homotopy. For the rank-zero bundle the unique family is already polynomial, and for X= every assertion is vacuous.

F1step 4.1construct
6.1

Let ft be a normalized automorphism homotopy. Apply steps 1.1–5.1 over the compact parameter space X×I to obtain a normalized Laurent family pt uniformly close to ft. If prescribed normalized Laurent approximations q0,q1 were chosen sufficiently close at the endpoints, the straight segments from q0 to p0 and from p1 to q1 stay in the same open automorphism neighborhood and remain Laurent and normalized. Concatenating these with pt gives the required normalized Laurent-polynomial homotopy.

F1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1construct
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Negative Laurent powers are cleared by Hopf-line stabilization

Statement

Assume AC. If

f(z)=j=rsajzj

is Laurent-polynomial clutching data for a bundle E over X×S2, then zrf(z) is polynomial. In the fixed clutching convention this multiplication tensors the glued bundle by prS2γr. The original K-class is recovered by multiplying by the inverse unit [γ]r.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, r,s0, and normalized Laurent clutching data f supplied by Uniform Laurent approximation through bundle automorphisms.

[F1]

Under the fixed convention, transition maps multiply under tensor product (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension).

[F2]

The external product pulls the Hopf line from S2 to X×S2 (External product in complex K-theory).

[F3]

For β=[γ]1, one has β2=0 and hence [γ]1=1β (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²)).

[A1]

AC is inherited from [F2] for the reduced product convention and from [F3]; the exponent-clearing calculation itself is finite algebra.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Multiplication gives zrf(z)=j=rsajzj+r, whose exponents range from 0 to r+s. On z=1 the scalar zr is nonzero, so zrf(z) remains an automorphism.

algebra
2.1

The line γr has transition zr. By [F1] and [F2], tensoring the bundle [E,f] with prS2γr multiplies its transition by zr. Therefore [E,zrf]=[E,f][γ]r in K0(X×S2).

F1F2A1step 1.1
3.1

By [F3], [γ] is a unit with [γ]r=(1β)r=1rβ. Multiplying the equality in step 2.1 by this unit gives [E,f]=[E,zrf][γ]r, so clearing the negative powers loses no class information. This includes r=0, when no change occurs.

F3A1step 2.1algebra
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Polynomial clutching families stabilize to linear clutching

Statement

Assume AC and let X be compact Hausdorff. Let q(z)=a0+a1z++anzn be polynomial clutching data for a bundle EX that is invertible for z=1. After adding n identity clutching summands, it is homotopic through invertible clutching maps to a general linear family Lnq=a(x)z+b(x) on (n+1)E. The construction is continuous in x and preserves the stabilized clutching class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff X, n0, a finite-rank complex bundle EX, and coefficient endomorphisms a0,,an such that q(z) is invertible on S1.

[F1]

Whitney sums are defined by block-direct-sum transition maps (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles).

[F2]

A homotopy of clutching automorphisms gives, by the transition-cocycle construction, a bundle over (X×S2)×I; its endpoint restrictions are isomorphic by homotopy invariance under AC (Vector bundles are glued from transition cocycles, Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback, The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For n=0, take L0q=q=0z+a0 and add no summand. Suppose n1. On (n+1)E define the block endomorphism. [F1, construct] Lnq(z)=(IzI000IzI000IzIanan1a1a0). Every entry is a finite polynomial in z and the coefficient bundle maps, and only the superdiagonal entries depend on z. Thus Lnq=a(x)z+b(x) varies continuously with x.

F1construct
2.1

Starting with Lnq, add z times column 1 to column 2, then z times the new column 2 to column 3, and continue. The first n rows become the first n rows of the identity, while the final entry of the last row becomes anzn++a1z+a0=q(z). Subtract suitable coefficient multiples of the first n rows from the last row to clear its first n entries. The resulting block matrix is B(z)=diag(I,,I,q(z)).

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Each column or row operation in step 2.1 is multiplication by an elementary triangular block matrix. Replacing its off-diagonal entry c by tc, 0t1, is a path of invertible elementary matrices. Since B(z) is invertible on S1 by hypothesis, reversing the finite sequence gives a homotopy through invertible clutching maps from B to Lnq. No fiber bases are selected globally: the block operations are bundle maps, and their invertibility can be checked in any local frame.

step 2.1algebraconstruct
4.1

By [F1], B clutches [nE,I][E,q]. By [F2] and step 3.1, the corresponding stabilized bundles satisfy the following isomorphism. [F1, F2, step 3.1] [E,q][nE,I][(n+1)E,Lnq]. This is the promised stable linearization. The matrix homotopy is a finite formula; AC is used only through [F2] to identify the endpoint bundles.

F1F2step 3.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Linear clutching splits into spectral subbundles

Statement

Assume AC. Suppose a(x)z+b(x) is a linear clutching automorphism of E for every xX and z=1. A disk-automorphism homotopy and a constant change of hemisphere frame reduce it to zIAx. The generalized eigenspaces of Ax with eigenvalues outside and inside the unit circle form complementary subbundles E> and E<. In the fixed convention,

[E,zIA]=[E>,I][E<,z],

so its K-class is prX[E>]+prX[E<]prS2[γ]. The construction preserves direct sums.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, compact Hausdorff X, and the displayed linear clutching family obtained after Polynomial clutching families stabilize to linear clutching.

[F1]

A constant bundle automorphism extends over a hemisphere and hence can be absorbed by changing a clutching trivialization (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension).

[F2]

Winding number is invariant under homotopy through nonzero loops and is additive under products (Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers).

[F3]

External product identifies [E,I] with the pullback from X and [E,z] with the pullback of E tensored by the Hopf line (External product in complex K-theory).

[F4]

The Hopf convention fixes z as γ and β=[γ]1 (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²)).

[A1]

AC is inherited from [F3] and [F4]; the finite-dimensional spectral construction itself makes no selections.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For 0t<1, the fractional-linear map z(z+t)/(1+tz) carries S1 to itself, and 1+tz0 there. Therefore Ht(z)=(1+tz)(a(z+t)/(1+tz)+b)=(a+tb)z+ta+b is a homotopy through linear clutching automorphisms from az+b. At t=1, the coefficient a+b is the original automorphism evaluated at z=1. Openness of bundle automorphisms and compactness of X give t0<1 for which C=a+t0b is invertible on every fiber.

constructalgebra
2.1

Right multiplication of Ht0 by the constant automorphism C1 does not change the glued bundle by [F1]. Since scalar z commutes with C, it gives zI+B, where B=(t0a+b)C1. Put A=B. Then zIA is invertible on S1, so Ax has no eigenvalue of modulus one.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

For one fiber V, factor the characteristic polynomial of A as q=q>q<, with the roots of the monic factors respectively outside and inside S1. Bézout polynomials for the relatively prime factors and Cayley–Hamilton give V>=kerq>(A)=imq<(A), V<=kerq<(A)=imq>(A), and V=V>V<. Both spaces are A-invariant and have precisely the indicated generalized eigenvalues. This also proves uniqueness: any invariant splitting with the same spectral locations is annihilated by the corresponding factor and therefore equals these kernels.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

These fiber splittings vary continuously. Around each root cluster choose a small circle disjoint from all roots. For a sufficiently small change of the polynomial, the straight-line change stays nonzero on each circle, so [F2] preserves the winding number of q/q. Factoring q into linear factors shows this winding is exactly the number of enclosed roots counted with multiplicity. Thus the inside and outside monic factors vary continuously in their coefficients. In a local frame choose vectors whose images under q<(A) and q>(A) form the bases in step 3.1; the same determinant remains nonzero nearby. Their images therefore give local frames for E> and E<, proving that the fiberwise spaces are complementary subbundles.

F2step 3.1algebra
5.1

On E>, the family tzIAE> is invertible for 0t1, since every eigenvalue of AE> has modulus greater than one; it deforms zIA to the constant A, which [F1] identifies with I. On E<, zItAE< stays invertible because all eigenvalues have modulus less than one; it deforms zIA to zI. Hence [F1] gives [E,zIA][E>,I][E<,z].

F1step 4.1algebra
6.1

Applying [F3] and the convention [F4] to step 5.1 gives the stated K-class, hence a combination of 1 and β. For a block direct sum, the characteristic polynomial factors and the unique inside/outside invariant splitting in step 3.1 is the direct sum of the individual splittings, so the construction is additive. Rank zero gives two zero subbundles and the same formula.

F3F4A1step 3.1step 5.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Fundamental product theorem for complex K-theory

Statement

Assume AC. For every compact Hausdorff space X, external product is a natural ring isomorphism

μ:K0(X)ZK0(S2)  K0(X×S2).

Writing β=[γ]1, every class on X×S2 has a unique form

prXa+prXbprS2β,a,bK0(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, compact Hausdorff X, the Hopf line γ clutched by z, and β=[γ]1.

[F1]

External product is a natural ring map (External product in complex K-theory).

[F2]

Every stabilized bundle on X×S2 has normalized data [E,f], unique up to normalized clutching homotopy (Normalized clutching data for bundles over X×S²).

[F3]

A normalized clutching map and a normalized homotopy admit Laurent approximations, including a Laurent-polynomial homotopy relative to chosen endpoints (Uniform Laurent approximation through bundle automorphisms).

[F4]

Negative powers are cleared by tensoring with γm (Negative Laurent powers are cleared by Hopf-line stabilization).

[F5]

If q has degree at most n, its block linearization Lnq satisfies [E,q][nE,I][(n+1)E,Lnq] (Polynomial clutching families stabilize to linear clutching), and the linear family has an additive spectral splitting into its outside and inside bundles M+ and M (Linear clutching splits into spectral subbundles).

[F6]

K0(S2)=Z{1,β}, β2=0, and γ=1+β (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²)).

[F7]

Under AC, the restrictions of a bundle over X×I to its two endpoints are isomorphic (Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback).

[A1]

AC is propagated through [F1]–[F7]; in particular it licenses their stable-complement, homotopy-invariance, partition, and reduced-product uses.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1] and [F6], μ is the natural ring map determined by e1prXe and eγprXeprS2γ.

F1F6A1
2.1

Let V be a bundle on X×S2. By [F2]–[F4], after harmless stabilization and homotopy it has data [E,zmq] with m0 and q polynomial of degree at most n. By [F5], if M+M is the spectral splitting of (n+1)E for Lnq, then [E,q]=[M+,I]+[M,z][nE,I]. Multiplying by γm gives [V]=M+γm+Mγ1mnEγm, which lies in the image of μ. Since bundle classes generate K0(X×S2), μ is surjective.

F2F3F4F5A1step 1.1algebra
3.1

The explicit block matrices in [F5] give two stabilization identities. Padding q to degree at most n+1 and clearing the first z block yields [(n+2)E,Ln+1q][(n+1)E,Lnq][E,I]. Applying the same matrix to zq and clearing the final z block yields [(n+2)E,Ln+1(zq)][(n+1)E,Lnq][E,z]; the possible sign z is absorbed by the constant gauge I.

F5step 2.1algebra
4.1

Under the spectral procedure of [F5], [E,I] has minus bundle 0 and [E,z] has minus bundle E: for z the monic endomorphism is A=0, while the Möbius reduction of the constant I produces z+t01I, whose associated A=t01I has all eigenvalues outside S1. Direct-sum compatibility in [F5] therefore turns the first identity of step 3.1 into M(n+1,q)M(n,q) and the second into M(n+1,zq)M(n,q)E.

F5step 3.1algebra
5.1

Define on a bundle represented by [E,zmq] the element ν([E,zmq])=[M(n,q)]β+[E]γm. The first identity in step 4.1 shows independence of the chosen degree bound ndegq.

F6step 4.1construct
6.1

Replacing (m,q) by (m+1,zq) changes the formula of step 5.1 to ([M]+[E])β+[E]γm1. Since [F6] gives γk=1+kβ, one has β=γmγm1; the new expression is therefore [M]β+[E]γm. Thus ν is independent of the Laurent shift.

F6step 4.1step 5.1algebra
7.1

The remaining choices also do not change ν. Varying the Möbius parameter t0 through values sufficiently close to 1 gives the spectral endomorphism over X×I, whose inside subbundle has isomorphic endpoint restrictions by [F7]. By [F2] any two normalized presentations of the same bundle are homotopic, and [F3] joins their Laurent approximations by a Laurent homotopy. Applying the finite block formula and spectral splitting over X×I again identifies the endpoint minus bundles by [F7]. Isomorphic initial bundles transport all data along their restriction over X×{1}. Hence the formula depends only on the isomorphism class of V.

F2F3F5F7A1step 5.1step 6.1
8.1

Block linearization and spectral splitting preserve direct sums by [F5], so the formula in step 5.1 takes Whitney sums to sums. It therefore extends uniquely from bundle classes to a homomorphism ν:K0(X×S2)K0(X)Z[β]/(β2).

F5F6step 5.1step 7.1
9.1

It remains to compute νμ. The domain is additively generated by [E]γm with m0: m=0,1 already give the basis 1,β because β=1γ1. Now μ([E]γm)=[E,zm], so take q=I and n=0. Step 4.1 gives M=0, and step 5.1 yields νμ([E]γm)=[E]γm. Additivity proves νμ=I.

F1F6step 4.1step 5.1step 8.1algebra
10.1

Step 9.1 makes μ injective, while step 2.1 makes it surjective; by step 1.1 it is a natural ring isomorphism. Finally [F6] identifies its domain additively with K0(X)K0(X)β, so bijectivity gives existence and uniqueness of the displayed normal form, including X= and the zero class.

F6step 1.1step 2.1step 9.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Negative-degree complex K-groups

Definition

For a compact Hausdorff space X, let X+=X{} with the added point as basepoint. For n0, define

Kn(X)=K~0(ΣnX+).

For a well-pointed based compact Hausdorff CGWH space X, define

K~n(X)=K~0(ΣnX),

and for a compact Hausdorff CGWH based pair (X,A) whose quotient X/A is well-pointed define

Kn(X,A)=K~0(Σn(X/A)).

Suspensions and quotients use Reduced cone suspension and cofiber sequence and the based CGWH conventions of Compactly generated based spaces and well-pointed objects. At n=0, restriction to the added point splits K0(X+)K0(X)K0(); its kernel is canonically K0(X). Thus K0(X) in this grading agrees with the original unreduced group. This also covers X=, since X+= and both groups are zero.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Complex Bott periodicity

Statement

Assume AC. Reduced external product with βK~0(S2)=K2() is a natural isomorphism

K~n(X)  K~n2(X)

for every n0 and based finite CW complex X, and likewise for compact pairs in the stated category. It extends the grading uniquely to natural isomorphisms Kq(X)Kq2(X) for all qZ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a based finite CW complex X, and β=[γ]1K~0(S2).

[F1]

The product theorem gives the unique decomposition K0(X×S2)=K0(X)K0(X)β (Fundamental product theorem for complex K-theory).

[F2]

Reduced external product is the unique class on the smash product whose pullback is the unreduced product (External product in complex K-theory).

[F3]

Negative groups are reduced groups of iterated suspensions (Negative-degree complex K-groups).

[F4]

The reduced cofibration sequence is natural and exact at every suspended stage (Reduced K-theory exact sequence of a cofibration).

[A1]

AC is used through the product theorem and the reduced external-product and exactness suppliers [F1], [F2], and [F4].

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The wedge inclusion XS2X×S2 has restriction map split by the two projections. Hence reduced exactness [F4] identifies K~0(XS2) with the subgroup of classes on the product restricting to zero on both axes. In the normal form a+bβ from [F1], restriction to X×{} is a, while restriction to {x0}×S2 is a(x0)+b(x0)β. Both vanish exactly when a=0 and bK~0(X).

F1F4A1algebra
2.1

By [F2], the class corresponding to b in step 1.1 is exactly the reduced external product bβ. Therefore bbβ is a natural isomorphism K~0(X)K~0(XS2)=K~0(Σ2X). Taking X=S0 with one nonbasepoint sends its rank-difference generator to β on S0S2S2. Since the unbased point has +=S0, [F3] identifies this target with the coefficient group K2().

F2F3A1step 1.1
3.1

Apply step 2.1 to ΣnX. A suspension of a finite CW complex is again a compact based finite CW complex, and S2ΣnXΣn+2X. Using [F3] gives the displayed isomorphism K~n(X)K~n2(X) for every n0. Replacing X by the compact quotient X/A gives the relative statement; naturality follows from naturality of external product and quotient maps.

F2F3step 2.1
4.1

Define positive degrees by transporting the already defined nonpositive groups along the inverse of step 3.1: choose r with q2r0 and set Kq(X)=Kq2r(X) using the canonical composite of inverse Bott maps. If a larger r is used, the two composites differ by a Bott isomorphism followed by its inverse, so the identification is independent of r. This is the unique extension for which multiplication by β gives KqKq2 in every degree.

step 3.1algebra
5.1

The maps in [F4] commute with external product by naturality, so the two-periodic identifications respect absolute, reduced, and relative maps and their exact sequences. This proves the stated natural periodic theory, including the zero group and the one-point boundary cases.

F2F4A1step 3.1step 4.1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Complex K-theory of spheres

Statement

Assume AC. For m0,

K~0(S2m)Z,K~0(S2m+1)=0.

The even generator is the m-fold reduced external product of the Bott class β, with S0 interpreted as a based two-point space and the empty product as its rank-difference generator. Equivalently, K~q(Sn) is Z when qn is even and is zero when qn is odd.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, based spheres, and the Hopf Bott class β.

[F1]

Multiplication by β is the natural twofold-suspension isomorphism in every degree (Complex Bott periodicity).

[F2]

Complex bundles on S1 are classified by clutching data on S0 and GLn(C) is path-connected in the complex case (Clutching classifies vector bundles over spheres in the stable range).

[F3]

K~0(S2)=Zβ (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²)).

[A1]

AC is propagated from [F1] and [F3]; the S0 and S1 base calculations themselves are finite and choice-free.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A bundle on the based two-point space S0 is a pair of finite-dimensional complex vector spaces. The reduced kernel records the dimension at the nonbasepoint minus the dimension at the basepoint, so K~0(S0)Z. On S1, [F2] reduces a rank-n bundle to two clutching values in the same path component of GLn(C), so it is trivial. Thus K0(S1)Z by rank and K~0(S1)=0.

F2algebra
2.1

Apply [F1] repeatedly to the two base groups in step 1.1. It gives K~0(S2m)K~0(S0)=Z and K~0(S2m+1)K~0(S1)=0 for all m0. At each even step the isomorphism is external product with β, so the generator is the stated m-fold product; for m=1 it agrees with [F3].

F1F3A1step 1.1induction
3.1

By definition, suspension shifts the reduced degree and [F1] makes it two-periodic. Hence K~q(Sn) depends only on the parity of qn; step 2.1 gives Z in even parity and zero in odd parity. This includes n=0, m=0, and the zero group without a hidden exception.

F1step 2.1algebra
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Complex K-theory is a two-periodic generalized cohomology theory

Statement

Assume AC. On finite CW pairs, the groups Kq form a contravariant two-periodic multiplicative generalized cohomology theory: homotopic maps induce equal maps, cofiber sequences give natural long exact sequences, suspension isomorphisms hold, and finite wedges map to direct sums. Its coefficients are

K2k()Z,K2k+1()=0

for every kZ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and finite based CW complexes and pairs.

[F1]

K0 is contravariantly functorial and homotopy invariant (K⁰ is contravariantly functorial and homotopy invariant).

[F2]

Every reduced cofibration gives a natural exact sequence at all iterated mapping-cone stages (Reduced K-theory exact sequence of a cofibration).

[F3]

Negative absolute, reduced, and relative groups are defined by iterated suspension (Negative-degree complex K-groups).

[F4]

Bott multiplication extends these groups naturally and uniquely to all integer degrees with period two (Complex Bott periodicity).

[F5]

Reduced external product descends to smash products (External product in complex K-theory).

[F6]

The reduced sphere groups have the even/odd parity calculation (Complex K-theory of spheres).

[A1]

AC is propagated from [F1], [F2], [F4], [F5], and [F6], including their bundle-homotopy, exactness, and reduced-product uses.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For q0, functoriality and homotopy invariance follow by applying [F1] to the suspended maps in [F3]. For arbitrary q, transport these maps through the natural Bott isomorphisms [F4]. Identity and composition are preserved by conjugating with natural isomorphisms, and homotopic maps remain equal.

F1F3F4A1
2.1

Apply [F2] after each suspension in [F3]. This gives the natural long exact cofiber sequence in every nonpositive degree, with the connecting map induced by the next mapping-cone arrow. Transport through [F4] gives the long exact sequence for every integer degree. Taking the cofiber of XCX identifies its quotient with ΣX and yields the suspension isomorphism, with the reflection signs already fixed in [F2].

F2F3F4A1step 1.1
2.2

For a finite wedge W=X1Xr, restriction gives K~0(W)iK~0(Xi). Let pi:WXi collapse the other summands. For reduced classes ai, the sum ipiai restricts to ai on Xi, because every other pj is constant there and reduced classes vanish at the basepoint. This is a two-sided inverse. Suspending and then applying [F4] proves the finite-wedge axiom in every degree; r=0 gives the zero group and r=1 the identity.

F1F3F4step 1.1algebra
3.1

For based reduced groups and i,j0, apply [F5] to ΣiX and ΣjY and use ΣiXΣjYΣi+j(XY). For absolute groups, apply the same construction to ΣiX+ and ΣjY+; the canonical homeomorphism X+Y+(X×Y)+ gives Ki(X)Kj(Y)K(i+j)(X×Y). Relative products are obtained by applying the reduced construction to quotient spaces. Diagonal pullback gives internal products. Tensor associativity, the trivial-line unit, and naturality hold at degree zero. The reduced products are uniquely characterized by their pullbacks to products, so these identities commute with suspension; [F4] transports them to all degrees. Thus the graded theory has natural associative unital external and internal products and is multiplicative.

F3F4F5A1step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

By [F3], Kq()=K~q(S0). The parity calculation [F6] gives Z for even q and zero for odd q, and [F4] identifies all even generators with Bott translates of 1. Together, the preceding four steps verify the homotopy, exactness, suspension, finite-wedge, and multiplicative axioms, including zero and one-point cases.

F3F4F6A1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources