How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linear clutching splits into spectral subbundles
Statement
Assume AC. Suppose is a linear clutching automorphism of for every and . A disk-automorphism homotopy and a constant change of hemisphere frame reduce it to . The generalized eigenspaces of with eigenvalues outside and inside the unit circle form complementary subbundles and . In the fixed convention,
so its -class is . The construction preserves direct sums.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, compact Hausdorff , and the displayed linear clutching family obtained after Polynomial clutching families stabilize to linear clutching.
A constant bundle automorphism extends over a hemisphere and hence can be absorbed by changing a clutching trivialization (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension).
Winding number is invariant under homotopy through nonzero loops and is additive under products (Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers).
External product identifies with the pullback from and with the pullback of tensored by the Hopf line (External product in complex K-theory).
The Hopf convention fixes as and (Hopf-line calculation of K⁰(S²)).
AC is inherited from [F3] and [F4]; the finite-dimensional spectral construction itself makes no selections.
Proof
For , the fractional-linear map carries to itself, and there. Therefore is a homotopy through linear clutching automorphisms from . At , the coefficient is the original automorphism evaluated at . Openness of bundle automorphisms and compactness of give for which is invertible on every fiber.
Right multiplication of by the constant automorphism does not change the glued bundle by [F1]. Since scalar commutes with , it gives , where . Put . Then is invertible on , so has no eigenvalue of modulus one.
For one fiber , factor the characteristic polynomial of as , with the roots of the monic factors respectively outside and inside . Bézout polynomials for the relatively prime factors and Cayley–Hamilton give , , and . Both spaces are -invariant and have precisely the indicated generalized eigenvalues. This also proves uniqueness: any invariant splitting with the same spectral locations is annihilated by the corresponding factor and therefore equals these kernels.
These fiber splittings vary continuously. Around each root cluster choose a small circle disjoint from all roots. For a sufficiently small change of the polynomial, the straight-line change stays nonzero on each circle, so [F2] preserves the winding number of . Factoring into linear factors shows this winding is exactly the number of enclosed roots counted with multiplicity. Thus the inside and outside monic factors vary continuously in their coefficients. In a local frame choose vectors whose images under and form the bases in step 3.1; the same determinant remains nonzero nearby. Their images therefore give local frames for and , proving that the fiberwise spaces are complementary subbundles.
On , the family is invertible for , since every eigenvalue of has modulus greater than one; it deforms to the constant , which [F1] identifies with . On , stays invertible because all eigenvalues have modulus less than one; it deforms to . Hence [F1] gives .
Applying [F3] and the convention [F4] to step 5.1 gives the stated -class, hence a combination of and . For a block direct sum, the characteristic polynomial factors and the unique inside/outside invariant splitting in step 3.1 is the direct sum of the individual splittings, so the construction is additive. Rank zero gives two zero subbundles and the same formula.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory, Proposition 2.7 and Lemma 2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)