Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The complexified tautological line resolves real-projective K-theory extensions

Statement

Assume AC. Let λ be the tautological real line on RPr, let ξ=λC be its complexification, and put α=[ξ]1K0(RPr). Then α2=2α,αk=(2)k1α (k1). If r=2m or r=2m+1, then α has exact additive order 2m and K~0(RPr)=Zα; moreover K1(RP2m)=0,K1(RP2m+1)Z.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume AC. The tautological real line λ and its complexification ξ=λC are the bundles classified by the standard inclusions of the respective Grassmannians (classifying maps of the tautological lines, as computed in the topological-vector-bundles page).

[A2]

Tensor product of real line bundles has transition functions multiplying the transition functions of the factors, and complexification converts λRλ into ξCξ; the Grothendieck ring has the corresponding multiplicative structure (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles, Grothendieck ring structure and rank map).

[A3]

Assume AC. The K-AHSS of RPr has E2p,q=Hp(RPr;Z) for even q and zero for odd q, with differentials of bidegree (r,1r) (Complex K-theory AHSS), and the integral cohomology of RPr is Z in degree 0, Z/2 in the even positive degrees below r, zero in the odd degrees below r, and Z in degree r when r is odd, Z/2 when r is even (the standard universal-coefficient computation of the integral cohomology of real projective space).

[A4]

The K-AHSS is multiplicative, its differentials are derivations and its stable page is the associated graded ring (Multiplicative AHSS for a multiplicative generalized theory).

[A5]

Atiyah's exact-sequence computation for the projective-space skeleta (Chapter II, §2.7, printed pp. 105–107) shows that K~0(RP2m)Z/2m, generated by x=[L]1, and that restriction induces an isomorphism K~0(RP2m+1)K~0(RP2m) carrying the odd-dimensional tautological generator to x. It also gives K1(RP2m)=0 and K1(RP2m+1)Z. Together with x2=2x, the exact-order statement says x,x2,,xm are nonzero and xm+1=0 on both RP2m and RP2m+1. This is the source input used here, not a computation reproved in this library.

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Assume AC, the tautological real line λ over RPr, the complexification ξ=λC and α=[ξ]1.

1.1

The transition functions of a real line bundle take values in {±1}, so the transition functions of λRλ are squares of ±1, hence equal to 1, and λRλ is trivial.

A1A2
1.2

The K-AHSS of RPr has nonzero entries only in even coefficient rows. A differential ds with s even has odd target row and vanishes. Let s be odd and let its source column satisfy p1. If p=r, as can occur in the top integral column when r is odd, then the target column r+s is outside the complex. If 0<p<r, a nonzero source has p even by [A3], so its target column p+s is odd and the target vanishes unless p+s=r; in that remaining case the source is a torsion group while Hr(RPr;Z)=Z is torsion-free, so the differential vanishes as well. Finally, a differential with source in the 0-column cannot be hit, and the 0-column edge identifies E0,qhq(pt)=Z=E20,q, so those differentials vanish too. Hence all differentials vanish and E2=E, so the associated graded of K0(RPr) consists of the integral cohomology of the projective space in even degrees, with the degree-two class in filtration two.

A3A4
2.1

Complexifying the triviality of the transition functions gives ξCξεC1; writing α=[ξ]1 in the ring of [A2] therefore gives (1+α)2=1, that is α2=2α, and multiplying repeatedly gives αk=(2)k1α for every k1.

A2step 1.1algebra
3.1

If m=0, both RP0 and RP1S1 have trivial reduced K0 by [A5], so α=0 has the asserted order 1. Now suppose m1. On RP2m, [A5] gives αm0 and αm+1=0. On RP2m+1, the restriction isomorphism of [A5] carries the tautological α to the even-dimensional one, so the same two power statements hold there as well. With α2=2α from step 2.1, consequently 2mα=(1)mαm+1=0 while 2m1α=(1)m1αm0. Thus α has exact order 2m and generates K~0(RPr); the two K1 calculations are the final clauses of [A5].

A5step 2.1
4.1

Steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 give the asserted relations, the exact order of α, the cyclicity of the reduced group and the two odd-group computations.

step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

Source notes

The relation α2=2α follows from λλε1. Atiyah's exact-sequence computation in Chapter II, §2.7, printed pp. 105–107, computes the even-dimensional reduced group, proves that restriction from the next odd-dimensional projective space is an isomorphism in K0, and computes both K1 groups. Those are the recorded source inputs used here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources