How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditional expectation given a discrete random variable
Example
Assume AC for conditional classes. If Y is a countably valued real random variable and X is real integrable, a version of takes value on each positive-mass fibre and zero on all zero-mass fibres.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A countably valued real random variable Y and real integrable X on a probability space; AC is the conditional-class convention.
The measurable integrable event-identity characterization defines the conditional class. (Conditional expectation as an ae class)
Versions are unique almost surely. (Conditional expectation is unique almost surely)
Increasing nonnegative partial sums pass through the integral. (Monotone convergence for the integral)
Finite weights summing to one define a probability space. (Finite probability spaces are exactly finite full-power-set probability spaces)
Verification
List the at most countably many fibres . Every union of fibres is measurable as a countable union, and these unions are exactly : each fibre is a preimage of a singleton Borel set, and every preimage is a union of fibres. The proposed function T is thus -measurable. Its absolute integral is , where [F3] applies to nonnegative finite partial sums. Null fibres have zero X integral and their countable union is null.
On each positive fibre , and on null fibres both sides are zero. For every union A of fibres, sum these identities; absolute summability follows from step 1.1 and integrability of X, with [F3] applied to positive and negative parts. Thus . By [F1]–[F2] T is the desired version.
For a concrete instance take atoms a,b,c with masses by [F4], with Y values (0,0,2) and X values (2,6,10). The zero fibre has mass and X integral , so its conditional value is 4. The fibre at 2 has mass and X integral 5, giving value 10. Hence T=(4,4,10), with mean .
Source notes
Durrett Example 4.1.5, printed p.208; van der Vaart Example 1.7 and its countable-partition extension, printed p.3. The countable sum is justified using ordinary MCT on positive and negative parts.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th ed. (standard reference, not scraped)