How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Constraint cloud rounding and loop counts
Example
Take two vertices joined by one edge carrying the empty relation over a nonempty alphabet. The cloud graph has two ports and ordinary edges; the full preprocessing graph has ordinary edges. Their optimal UNSAT values are respectively and , whereas the original UNSAT is one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let have ordinary edges, with the fixed nonempty alphabet and paired-loop convention. Its cloud graph is degree , has vertices and ordinary edges, and is constructible in polynomial time without changing the alphabet. Put and . Then For every labeling of , plurality decoding satisfies . For an edgeless input use the empty output convention and UNSAT zero. (Regularization preserves value quantitatively).
For with edges, the full preprocessing graph has vertices, degree , and ordinary edges over the same alphabet. It has loops at every vertex and With and , For every port labeling , and . Construction and plurality decoding take polynomial time. The edgeless convention has UNSAT zero. (Constraint expander overlay).
Verification
Each original vertex has a singleton cloud. Its degree- internal graph consists of ordinary equality loops. There are therefore internal loops and one external empty-relation edge, totaling . Every loop is satisfied and the external edge always fails, so every labeling has violation fraction . This matches the cloud construction's two-port count.
The degree- overlay on two vertices adds ordinary tautological edges, and the additional loops per port add more. Thus the total is . Only the empty-relation edge fails for every labeling, yielding , exactly the overlay factor. This shows the quantitative UNSAT statement does not mean exact preservation of value. A one-symbol alphabet suffices for the example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Irit Dinur, The PCP theorem by gap amplification; §4 Lemmas4.1–4.2, pp12–15; smallest nonempty instance. (standard reference, not scraped)