How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A countable shrinking computed
Example
In a discrete space every decreasing closed sequence with empty intersection is its own open expansion: has . Explicitly, on discrete take and . No choice axiom is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A discrete space (every subset is open), and decreasing closed with empty intersection; in the displayed instance and .
Countable paracompactness asks for a locally finite open refining cover of each countable open cover (Countable paracompactness and Dowker spaces).
Verification
In a discrete space complements of subsets are open, so every subset is also closed. Thus is open, contains , and has . Consequently . The same equations hold when or is empty.
For the instance on , , , and . For each , , proving the empty intersection despite every being nonempty. The singleton family is an open refining cover of every open cover: a member containing also contains . The neighborhood meets exactly one singleton, so the family is locally finite, verifying countable paracompactness directly. No simultaneous selection of cover members is involved. QED.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- K. P. Hart, Set-Theoretic Topology, Chapter 4 §3 Theorem 3.3(3), p. 27; discrete specialization (standard reference, not scraped)