Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

D=4 massive spin one-half and spin one descent

Example

In spacetime dimension D=4, take the universal Lorentz cover L~, so the massive little group at pm=me0, m>0, is Spin(3)≅SU(2) and its central deck element is z=−I. For m0=1,2, let Wm0=Sym⁡m0(C2) with the natural SU(2) action, and let θm0 be that action; using the convention that highest weight m0 has spin m0/2, these are spin 12 and spin 1. Their positive-energy Poincaré inductions

πpm,θm0=Ind⁡R4⋊SU(2)R4⋊L~(χpm⊗θm0)

are irreducible. The spin-12 induction has z acting by −I and does not descend to the ordinary Poincaré group with Lorentz group SO0(3,1); the spin-1 induction has z acting by +I and does descend.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: D=4, m>0, pm=me0, and the universal double cover of SO0(3,1).

[F1]

Positive-energy Wigner–Mackey classification for connected covers: for pm∈C+ and an irreducible representation of its stabilizer, induction gives an irreducible positive-energy representation.

[F2]

Global Lorentz stabilizers and their connected-cover preimages: in D≥4 the massive stabilizer for the universal cover is Spin(D−1).

[F3]

SU(2) to SO(3) as a covering homomorphism: SU(2) is the unit-quaternion group and its covering of SO(3) has kernel {I,−I}.

[F4]

Central kernel characters control descent of Poincaré inductions: an induced representation descends through a cover quotient exactly when the little-group representation is trivial on its central kernel.

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by [F1] and the covering supplier [F3]. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The group data and representations in the Example.

1.1F2F3A1givenconstruct

The standard SU(2) action on C2 is unitary and smooth; its tensor-square action is also unitary and smooth, and its symmetric subspace W2=Sym⁡2(C2) is invariant. Hence both restricted actions θ1 and θ2 are strongly continuous unitary representations. The standard action on W1=C2 is irreducible: for every unit vector (u,v), the matrix (u−v‾vu‾)∈SU(2) sends e1 to (u,v), so SU(2) is transitive on the unit sphere and any nonzero invariant subspace is all of W1. For W2, use the basis e1⊙e1,e1⊙e2,e2⊙e2. The torus element t=diag⁡(eiπ/6,e−iπ/6) acts with distinct eigenvalues eiπ/3,1,e−iπ/3. If a nonzero invariant subspace contains a vector with several weight terms, Lagrange interpolation polynomials in θ2(t) project onto its nonzero weight components, so it contains at least one basis vector. A group-invariant subspace is invariant under the differentiated su(2) action because it is closed and contains each group orbit; complex-linear extension makes it invariant under E12 and E21 in sl2(C). These operators send e2⊙e2↦2e1⊙e2↦2e1⊙e1 and e1⊙e1↦2e1⊙e2↦2e2⊙e2 (with nonzero coefficients), and from the middle vector they reach both endpoints. Thus every nonzero invariant subspace is all of W2. The torus weights are z,z−1 for W1 and z2,1,z−2 for W2, which give the spin labels 1/2 and 1 under the convention in the Example.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

On W1=C2, z=−I acts as −I. On the whole tensor square, it acts as (−I)⊗(−I)=I, so its restriction to W2 is also I. The kernel of SU(2)→SO(3) is exactly {I,z} by [F3].

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1given∎

The momentum pm is future timelike, hence is in C+. By [F1], each θm0 gives an irreducible positive-energy induction. Applying [F4] to the central kernel {I,z}, the spin-12 induction fails the identity condition and cannot descend; the spin-1 induction satisfies it and descends to the ordinary Poincaré group.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources