Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The zero-module and surjective-ideal depth conventions

Example

For every commutative ring R and ideal I, depth⁡I(0)=+∞. There are also nonzero examples with IM=M: for R=k×k, I=k×0, and M=I, one has IM=M and hence depth⁡I(M)=+∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=I is generated by the idempotent (1,0) and is nonzero.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

The exceptional clause in the definition applies to the zero module because I0=0. In the product-ring example, I2=I, so IM=I2=M.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

lem-depth-infinity-when-ideal-acts-surjectively therefore assigns +∞ in both cases. This does not conflict with Nakayama: the ideal in the nonzero example is not contained in the Jacobson radical.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources