How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The zero-module and surjective-ideal depth conventions
Example
For every commutative ring and ideal , . There are also nonzero examples with : for , , and , one has and hence .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is generated by the idempotent and is nonzero.
Verification
The exceptional clause in the definition applies to the zero module because . In the product-ring example, , so .
lem-depth-infinity-when-ideal-acts-surjectively therefore assigns in both cases. This does not conflict with Nakayama: the ideal in the nonzero example is not contained in the Jacobson radical.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Depth and Cohen--Macaulay modules source treatment (standard reference, not scraped)