Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 2 also cleared it.

Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These concrete examples compute the depth convention, show sharpness of the Depth Lemma, test parameter regularity and completion, and distinguish Cohen--Macaulayness from being a domain.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A zero-dimensional local ring is Cohen--Macaulay

Example

Let k be a field and A=k[ε]/(ε2). This nonreduced local Artinian ring is Cohen--Macaulay of dimension 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k is a field and ε2=0 in A.

[F1]

A Noetherian local ring is Cohen--Macaulay when its depth equals its dimension (Cohen--Macaulay local modules and rings).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Every element is uniquely a+bε with a,b∈k. It is a unit when a≠0, with inverse a−1−ba−2ε; when a=0 it lies in (ε). Thus (ε) is the unique maximal ideal. Any nonzero ideal contained in (ε) contains bε for some b≠0 and hence contains ε, so the ideals are exactly 0, (ε) and A. Consequently A is Artinian and Noetherian, and it is nonreduced because ε≠0 but ε2=0.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra∎

Every prime ideal contains the nilpotent element ε, so the unique prime is (ε) and dim⁡A=0. Every element of (ε) annihilates the nonzero element ε, hence no element of the maximal ideal is A-regular and depth⁡A=0. Therefore A is Cohen--Macaulay by [F1].

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Polynomial rings are Cohen--Macaulay

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every field k and every integer n≥0, the polynomial ring k[X1,…,Xn] is a Cohen--Macaulay ring. At the homogeneous maximal ideal m=(X1,…,Xn), the variables form a regular system of parameters of the local ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a field is a zero-dimensional Cohen--Macaulay ring.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Under the stated Choice premise, iterating Polynomial extensions of Cohen--Macaulay rings shows that k[X1,…,Xn] is globally Cohen--Macaulay.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

In the localization at m, multiplication by Xi remains injective after quotienting by the preceding variables, and the terminal quotient is k. Thus the displayed variables are a regular parameter system of length n.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A non-Cohen--Macaulay local quotient

Example

Let k be a field and let A=k⟦x,y⟧/(x2,xy),m=(x,y)A. Then A is a one-dimensional Noetherian local ring of depth 0, so it is not Cohen--Macaulay.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field and quotient ring in the example.

[F1]

Depth is the supremum of regular-sequence lengths in the maximal ideal when its product with the module is proper (Depth with respect to an ideal, Regular Sequence On A Module).

[F2]

A nonzero finite local module is Cohen--Macaulay when its depth equals its support dimension (Cohen--Macaulay local modules and rings).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Every class in A has a unique expression f(y)+ax, where f∈k⟦y⟧ and a∈k: all monomials involving x except x itself belong to (x2,xy). Thus x≠0, x2=yx=0, and the projection A→k⟦y⟧ has kernel kx. An element is a unit precisely when f(0)≠0: the series f is then invertible by recursive coefficient multiplication, and the square-zero correction is inverted by 1−z. If f(0)=0, its image in the quotient A/(x,y)=k is zero, so it is not a unit. Hence A is local with maximal ideal (x,y).

2.1step 1.1algebra

Every nonzero series in k⟦y⟧ is ym times a unit, by its least nonzero coefficient. Consequently every nonzero ideal in that ring is (ym), taking the least order among its nonzero elements. For an ideal J of A, its projection is therefore principal. If nonzero, lift one generator to z∈J; subtracting suitable k⟦y⟧-multiples of z from elements of J leaves elements of J∩kx. This intersection is either zero or kx, since it is a subspace of a one-dimensional k-space. Thus J is generated by z and, if needed, x; when its projection is zero it is generated by x or is zero. Every ideal is finitely generated, so A is Noetherian by Noetherian commutative rings and modules.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Every prime of A contains the nilpotent x, so prime ideals correspond to those of A/(x)=k⟦y⟧. The latter has exactly the primes (0) and (y) by the ideal description in step 2.1, and they are distinct. Hence dim⁡A=1.

4.1F1F2step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

Every element of m annihilates the nonzero x. None is therefore an A-regular element. Since A/m=k≠0, the empty sequence is regular and no positive-length regular sequence in m exists. Thus depth⁡A=0 by [F1]. The support of the regular module is the whole spectrum, of dimension one, so [F2] shows that A is not Cohen--Macaulay.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A Cohen--Macaulay ring with zero divisors

Example

For a field k, the ring A=k⟦x,y⟧/(xy) is a one-dimensional Cohen--Macaulay local ring with nonzero zero divisors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k is a field. A nonzero one-variable formal power series factors as a power of its variable times a unit, by its least nonzero coefficient. In k⟦x,y⟧, a series with nonzero constant term is invertible by the formal geometric series.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Put A=k⟦x,y⟧/(xy) and m=(x,y)A. A series is a unit exactly when its constant term is nonzero, so A is local with maximal ideal m. The maps setting y=0 and x=0 identify A/(y) with k⟦x⟧ and A/(x) with k⟦y⟧. Every prime of A contains x or y since xy=0. In either one-variable quotient the only primes are (0) and the variable ideal: factor a nonzero member by its least-order term, whose remaining factor is a unit. Thus the prime chains of A have length at most one, while (x)A⊊m is such a chain. Hence dim⁡A=1.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The map A→k⟦x⟧×k⟦y⟧ given by the two branch restrictions is injective: a series divisible by both x and y is divisible by xy. The element x+y maps to (x,y), so multiplication by it is injective on both domains and therefore on A. The quotient A/(x+y)≅k⟦x⟧/(x2) is nonzero. Thus (x+y) is an A-regular sequence and depth⁡A≥1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

To see that no A-regular sequence has length two, let u∈m be any nonzerodivisor. Its two branch restrictions are nonzero; write them xah(x) and ybg(y), with a,b≥1 and h,g units. Since xu=xa+1h(x) and yu=yb+1g(y) in A, both xa+1 and yb+1 lie in (u). Hence a power of m vanishes in the nonzero local ring A/uA. Every element of its maximal ideal is nilpotent and therefore cannot be a nonzerodivisor there. By the depth and regular-sequence definitions, depth⁡A=1=dim⁡A. The classes of x and y are nonzero and have zero product, as claimed.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A nonfree maximal Cohen--Macaulay module

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, A=k⟦x,y⟧/(xy) and M=A/(x)≅k⟦y⟧. Then M is a nonfree maximal Cohen--Macaulay A-module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the displayed ring and module. Finite polynomial rings over a field are Noetherian and have dimension equal to their number of variables; localizations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (If R is Noetherian then R[x1,…,xn] is Noetherian for every n∈N, A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian). Completion of a Noetherian local ring is Noetherian local and preserves its dimension under the assumed choice premise (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field, Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data). A one-variable series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is nonzero (A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

For r=1,2, the coordinate localization Pr=k[x1,…,xr](x1,…,xr) is Noetherian local. Its dimension is r: the coordinate-prime chain has length r, while localization cannot increase the dimension r of the polynomial ring. The quotients Pr/(x1,…,xr)q are the degree-<q truncated polynomial rings. Their inverse limit is the formal power series ring k⟦x1,…,xr⟧, because compatible truncations determine exactly one coefficient for every monomial and multiplication agrees coefficientwise. The completion results in the Given paragraph make this series ring Noetherian local of dimension r, with maximal ideal generated by its variables and residue field k.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

Put Q=k⟦x,y⟧. Its quotient A=Q/(xy) is Noetherian local. Every prime of Q containing xy contains x or y. Each quotient Q/(x)≅k⟦y⟧ and Q/(y)≅k⟦x⟧ has only the primes (0) and its maximal ideal: every nonzero one-variable series is a unit times a power of its variable. Hence the primes of A are (x)A, (y)A and (x,y)A, and dim⁡A=1.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra

The cyclic A-module M=A/(x)≅k⟦y⟧ is nonzero and finite. Multiplication by y is injective on it, and M/yM≅k is nonzero, so depth⁡A(M)≥1. If a∈(x,y)A is any M-regular element, its image in k⟦y⟧ is ytu for some t≥1 and unit u. The nonzero class of yt−1 in M/aM≅k⟦y⟧/(yt) is annihilated by both x and y, hence by the maximal ideal. Thus no second element of that ideal is regular on M/aM, and depth⁡A(M)=1.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

By step 2.1 and the definition of maximal Cohen--Macaulay, depth⁡A(M)=dim⁡A=1. The class of x in A is nonzero (reduce modulo y) but annihilates all of M; a nonzero free A-module has zero annihilator. Therefore M is nonfree.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Depth of a hypersurface quotient

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let (Q,n) be a regular local domain of dimension d>0 and let 0≠f∈n. Then depth⁡(Q/(f))=d−1=dim⁡(Q/(f)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; Q is Cohen--Macaulay of depth d, and f is a nonzerodivisor.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

The depth quotient formula gives depth⁡(Q/(f))=depth⁡(Q)−1=d−1.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The principal ideal theorem and regularity of f give dim⁡(Q/(f))=d−1. Thus the hypersurface quotient is Cohen--Macaulay.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Depth of a union of planes

Example

Assume Dependent Choice. Let S=k[x,y,z,w](x,y,z,w), I=(x,y), J=(z,w), and A=S/(I∩J). The union of the two coordinate planes has dim⁡A=2 but depth⁡A=1, so it is not Cohen--Macaulay.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain), I+J is the maximal ideal, and I∩J=IJ.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The ring A embeds in S/I⊕S/J by reduction modulo I and J, because I∩J=IJ. Put ℓ=x+z. Its image is (z,x) in the two polynomial-domain quotients, so multiplication by ℓ is injective on their direct sum and hence on A. Thus depth⁡A≥1.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

More generally the embedding identifies A with the fibre product of the two local polynomial rings B=S/I and C=S/J over their common residue field k: its elements are pairs (f,g) with equal constant term. Let a=(f,g) be any regular element of the maximal ideal of A. Since B,C are domains, regularity forces f,g≠0, and both have zero constant term. The pair (f,0) belongs to A but is not in aA: an equation a(h,j)=(f,0) would force h=1,j=0, while (1,0)∉A. For every maximal-ideal element (u,v), however, (u,v)(f,0)=(fu,0)=a(u,0) because (u,0)∈A. Thus the nonzero class of (f,0) in A/aA is annihilated by the entire maximal ideal. No regular sequence can extend a, so depth⁡A≤1. Step 1.1 gives the reverse bound. Both irreducible components have dimension 2, so dim⁡A=2.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The zero-module and surjective-ideal depth conventions

Example

For every commutative ring R and ideal I, depth⁡I(0)=+∞. There are also nonzero examples with IM=M: for R=k×k, I=k×0, and M=I, one has IM=M and hence depth⁡I(M)=+∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=I is generated by the idempotent (1,0) and is nonzero.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

The exceptional clause in the definition applies to the zero module because I0=0. In the product-ring example, I2=I, so IM=I2=M.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

lem-depth-infinity-when-ideal-acts-surjectively therefore assigns +∞ in both cases. This does not conflict with Nakayama: the ideal in the nonzero example is not contained in the Jacobson radical.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Three sharp Depth Lemma inequalities

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let R=k⟦t⟧ and k=R/(t). The three Depth Lemma lower bounds are sharp:

  1. in 0→k→k⊕R→R→0, the middle bound is 0=min⁡{0,1};
  2. in 0→R→tR→k→0, the left bound is 1=min⁡{1,0+1};
  3. in the same nonsplit sequence, the right bound is 0=min⁡{1−1,1}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; The three short exact sequences displayed in the Example; depth and regular sequences use Depth with respect to an ideal and Regular Sequence On A Module.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The maximal ideal of R is (t). Multiplication by t is injective on R, so (t) is an R-regular sequence of length one. For any nonzero r∈(t), write r=tmu with m≥1 and u a unit, using the first nonzero coefficient of the power series. In R/(r), the class of tm−1 is nonzero and is annihilated by every element of (t). Thus no regular sequence in (t) has length two, and depth⁡R=1. The same annihilation gives depth⁡Rk=0.

2.1step 1.1algebra

The first sequence is split exact. The second and third sequences are exact because t is a nonzerodivisor and its cokernel is k. Every element of (t) annihilates the nonzero element (1,0) of k⊕R, so this middle module has depth zero.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Substitution of the depth triples (0,0,1) and (1,1,0) into the three bounds of The three Depth Lemma inequalities gives the displayed equalities, so no lower bound can be increased in general.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A parameter sequence regular in a hypersurface

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, and let k be a field. In A=k⟦x,y,z⟧/(xy), the pair x+y,z is a system of parameters and a regular sequence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the displayed ring. Finite polynomial rings over a field are Noetherian and have dimension equal to their number of variables; localizations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (If R is Noetherian then R[x1,…,xn] is Noetherian for every n∈N, A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian). Completion of a Noetherian local ring is Noetherian local and preserves its dimension under the assumed choice premise (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field, Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data). Systems of parameters have length equal to ring dimension and generate an ideal with maximal radical (Systems of parameters and parameter ideals).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

For r=1,2,3, the coordinate localization Pr=k[x1,…,xr](x1,…,xr) is Noetherian local. Its dimension is r: the coordinate-prime chain has length r, while localization cannot increase the dimension r of the polynomial ring. The quotients Pr/(x1,…,xr)q are the degree-<q truncated polynomial rings. Their inverse limit is k⟦x1,…,xr⟧, since compatible truncations give exactly one coefficient per monomial and multiplication agrees coefficientwise. By the completion results in the Given paragraph, this series ring is Noetherian local of dimension r, with maximal ideal generated by the variables and residue field k. It is a domain: the lowest nonzero homogeneous parts of two nonzero series multiply to a nonzero polynomial over the field k.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

Put Q=k⟦x,y,z⟧. Its quotient A=Q/(xy) is Noetherian local. Every prime of Q containing xy contains x or y; any chain of such primes lies above one of these two ideals and so has length at most 2, because Q/(x)≅k⟦y,z⟧ and Q/(y)≅k⟦x,z⟧ both have dimension 2. Either branch also supplies a chain of length 2, hence dim⁡A=2.

2.2step 1.1givenalgebra

Suppose (x+y)g∈(xy) in Q. Reducing modulo (x) gives yg≡0 in the domain k⟦y,z⟧, so g∈(x); reducing modulo (y) similarly gives g∈(y). Coefficientwise, (x)∩(y)=(xy) in Q, so g∈(xy). Hence x+y is a nonzerodivisor on A.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra

The quotient A/(x+y,z)≅k⟦x⟧/(x2) is nonzero and has only one prime, (x), since x is nilpotent and the quotient by (x) is k. Thus (x+y,z)A has radical the maximal ideal (x,y,z)A. Together with step 2.1, this makes x+y,z a system of parameters.

4.1step 3.1step 2.2algebra∎

After quotienting by x+y one has A/(x+y)≅k⟦x,z⟧/(x2)≅k⟦z⟧⊕xk⟦z⟧ as a k⟦z⟧-module. Multiplication by z is injective on both summands, and the final quotient is nonzero by step 3.1. Therefore x+y,z is a regular sequence on A, as claimed.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A parameter sequence that fails in a non-Cohen--Macaulay ring

Example

In the one-dimensional local ring A=k⟦x,y⟧/(x2,xy), the one-element sequence y is a system of parameters but is not regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ex-non-cohen-macaulay-local-ring computes dim⁡A=1 and depth⁡A=0.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

The quotient A/yA≅k⟦x⟧/(x2) has dimension 0, so y is a parameter.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

But the nonzero class of x satisfies yx=0. Thus y is a zero divisor and the parameter sequence is not regular, matching the depth gap 0<1.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Associated primes are unmixed in a Cohen--Macaulay example

Example

For A=k⟦x,y⟧/(xy), Ass⁡A(A)={(x)A,(y)A}. Both associated-prime quotients have dimension 1=dim⁡A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A is the Cohen--Macaulay hypersurface from ex-cohen-macaulay-ring-with-zero-divisors.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Put Q=k⟦x,y⟧. Its quotients by (x) and (y) are the domains k⟦y⟧ and k⟦x⟧. Also (x)∩(y)=(xy): a series divisible by both x and y has every monomial divisible by xy. Thus (x)A and (y)A are prime. In A, the annihilator of the nonzero class of x is (y)A, and that of y is (x)A, so both primes are associated.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Let 0≠a∈A be represented by f∈Q. If f∈(x)∖(y), then ga=0 implies gf∈(xy)⊆(y); reduction in the domain Q/(y) forces g∈(y), and the reverse inclusion follows from f∈(x). Hence Ann⁡A(a)=(y)A. Symmetrically, if f∈(y)∖(x), its annihilator is (x)A. If f lies in neither ideal, reduction modulo each of (x) and (y) forces any annihilator g into their intersection (xy), so Ann⁡A(a)=0. The remaining case f∈(x)∩(y) represents zero. Since xy=0 in A with x,y≠0, the zero ideal is not prime. Therefore (x)A and (y)A are the only associated primes.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra∎

Finally A/(x)≅k⟦y⟧ and A/(y)≅k⟦x⟧, each of dimension 1=dim⁡A by the cited hypersurface example. This verifies unmixedness directly.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A depth computation before and after completion

Example

Let A=k[x,y](x,y)/(xy),A^≅k⟦x,y⟧/(xy). Then x+y is regular on both rings and depth⁡A=depth⁡A^=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: both rings have dimension 1.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

In either the localized polynomial ring or the formal power-series ring, if (x+y)g=0 modulo (xy), reduction modulo (x) and modulo (y) gives yg=0 in the domain k[y](y) or k⟦y⟧ and xg=0 in k[x](x) or k⟦x⟧. Thus g lies in both (x) and (y), whose intersection is (xy) in each ambient ring. Hence x+y is regular on both A and A^.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The regular element gives depth at least 1, and the given dimension bound gives depth at most 1, on both sides. Thus both depths equal 1 directly.

Sources