How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These concrete examples compute the depth convention, show sharpness of the Depth Lemma, test parameter regularity and completion, and distinguish Cohen--Macaulayness from being a domain.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A zero-dimensional local ring is Cohen--Macaulay
Example
Let be a field and . This nonreduced local Artinian ring is Cohen--Macaulay of dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is a field and in .
A Noetherian local ring is Cohen--Macaulay when its depth equals its dimension (Cohen--Macaulay local modules and rings).
Verification
Every element is uniquely with . It is a unit when , with inverse ; when it lies in . Thus is the unique maximal ideal. Any nonzero ideal contained in contains for some and hence contains , so the ideals are exactly , and . Consequently is Artinian and Noetherian, and it is nonreduced because but .
Every prime ideal contains the nilpotent element , so the unique prime is and . Every element of annihilates the nonzero element , hence no element of the maximal ideal is -regular and . Therefore is Cohen--Macaulay by [F1].
Polynomial rings are Cohen--Macaulay
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every field and every integer , the polynomial ring is a Cohen--Macaulay ring. At the homogeneous maximal ideal , the variables form a regular system of parameters of the local ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; a field is a zero-dimensional Cohen--Macaulay ring.
Verification
Under the stated Choice premise, iterating Polynomial extensions of Cohen--Macaulay rings shows that is globally Cohen--Macaulay.
In the localization at , multiplication by remains injective after quotienting by the preceding variables, and the terminal quotient is . Thus the displayed variables are a regular parameter system of length .
A non-Cohen--Macaulay local quotient
Example
Let be a field and let Then is a one-dimensional Noetherian local ring of depth , so it is not Cohen--Macaulay.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field and quotient ring in the example.
Depth is the supremum of regular-sequence lengths in the maximal ideal when its product with the module is proper (Depth with respect to an ideal, Regular Sequence On A Module).
A nonzero finite local module is Cohen--Macaulay when its depth equals its support dimension (Cohen--Macaulay local modules and rings).
Verification
Every class in has a unique expression , where and : all monomials involving except itself belong to . Thus , , and the projection has kernel . An element is a unit precisely when : the series is then invertible by recursive coefficient multiplication, and the square-zero correction is inverted by . If , its image in the quotient is zero, so it is not a unit. Hence is local with maximal ideal .
Every nonzero series in is times a unit, by its least nonzero coefficient. Consequently every nonzero ideal in that ring is , taking the least order among its nonzero elements. For an ideal of , its projection is therefore principal. If nonzero, lift one generator to ; subtracting suitable -multiples of from elements of leaves elements of . This intersection is either zero or , since it is a subspace of a one-dimensional -space. Thus is generated by and, if needed, ; when its projection is zero it is generated by or is zero. Every ideal is finitely generated, so is Noetherian by Noetherian commutative rings and modules.
Every prime of contains the nilpotent , so prime ideals correspond to those of . The latter has exactly the primes and by the ideal description in step 2.1, and they are distinct. Hence .
Every element of annihilates the nonzero . None is therefore an -regular element. Since , the empty sequence is regular and no positive-length regular sequence in exists. Thus by [F1]. The support of the regular module is the whole spectrum, of dimension one, so [F2] shows that is not Cohen--Macaulay.
A Cohen--Macaulay ring with zero divisors
Example
For a field , the ring is a one-dimensional Cohen--Macaulay local ring with nonzero zero divisors.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is a field. A nonzero one-variable formal power series factors as a power of its variable times a unit, by its least nonzero coefficient. In , a series with nonzero constant term is invertible by the formal geometric series.
Verification
Put and . A series is a unit exactly when its constant term is nonzero, so is local with maximal ideal . The maps setting and identify with and with . Every prime of contains or since . In either one-variable quotient the only primes are and the variable ideal: factor a nonzero member by its least-order term, whose remaining factor is a unit. Thus the prime chains of have length at most one, while is such a chain. Hence .
The map given by the two branch restrictions is injective: a series divisible by both and is divisible by . The element maps to , so multiplication by it is injective on both domains and therefore on . The quotient is nonzero. Thus is an -regular sequence and .
To see that no -regular sequence has length two, let be any nonzerodivisor. Its two branch restrictions are nonzero; write them and , with and units. Since and in , both and lie in . Hence a power of vanishes in the nonzero local ring . Every element of its maximal ideal is nilpotent and therefore cannot be a nonzerodivisor there. By the depth and regular-sequence definitions, . The classes of and are nonzero and have zero product, as claimed.
A nonfree maximal Cohen--Macaulay module
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field, and . Then is a nonfree maximal Cohen--Macaulay -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the displayed ring and module. Finite polynomial rings over a field are Noetherian and have dimension equal to their number of variables; localizations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every , A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian). Completion of a Noetherian local ring is Noetherian local and preserves its dimension under the assumed choice premise (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field, Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data). A one-variable series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is nonzero (A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit).
Verification
For , the coordinate localization is Noetherian local. Its dimension is : the coordinate-prime chain has length , while localization cannot increase the dimension of the polynomial ring. The quotients are the degree- truncated polynomial rings. Their inverse limit is the formal power series ring , because compatible truncations determine exactly one coefficient for every monomial and multiplication agrees coefficientwise. The completion results in the Given paragraph make this series ring Noetherian local of dimension , with maximal ideal generated by its variables and residue field .
Put . Its quotient is Noetherian local. Every prime of containing contains or . Each quotient and has only the primes and its maximal ideal: every nonzero one-variable series is a unit times a power of its variable. Hence the primes of are , and , and .
The cyclic -module is nonzero and finite. Multiplication by is injective on it, and is nonzero, so . If is any -regular element, its image in is for some and unit . The nonzero class of in is annihilated by both and , hence by the maximal ideal. Thus no second element of that ideal is regular on , and .
By step 2.1 and the definition of maximal Cohen--Macaulay, . The class of in is nonzero (reduce modulo ) but annihilates all of ; a nonzero free -module has zero annihilator. Therefore is nonfree.
Depth of a hypersurface quotient
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a regular local domain of dimension and let . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; is Cohen--Macaulay of depth , and is a nonzerodivisor.
Verification
The depth quotient formula gives .
The principal ideal theorem and regularity of give . Thus the hypersurface quotient is Cohen--Macaulay.
Depth of a union of planes
Example
Assume Dependent Choice. Let , , , and . The union of the two coordinate planes has but , so it is not Cohen--Macaulay.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain), is the maximal ideal, and .
Verification
The ring embeds in by reduction modulo and , because . Put . Its image is in the two polynomial-domain quotients, so multiplication by is injective on their direct sum and hence on . Thus .
More generally the embedding identifies with the fibre product of the two local polynomial rings and over their common residue field : its elements are pairs with equal constant term. Let be any regular element of the maximal ideal of . Since are domains, regularity forces , and both have zero constant term. The pair belongs to but is not in : an equation would force , while . For every maximal-ideal element , however, because . Thus the nonzero class of in is annihilated by the entire maximal ideal. No regular sequence can extend , so . Step 1.1 gives the reverse bound. Both irreducible components have dimension , so .
The zero-module and surjective-ideal depth conventions
Example
For every commutative ring and ideal , . There are also nonzero examples with : for , , and , one has and hence .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is generated by the idempotent and is nonzero.
Verification
The exceptional clause in the definition applies to the zero module because . In the product-ring example, , so .
lem-depth-infinity-when-ideal-acts-surjectively therefore assigns in both cases. This does not conflict with Nakayama: the ideal in the nonzero example is not contained in the Jacobson radical.
Three sharp Depth Lemma inequalities
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let and . The three Depth Lemma lower bounds are sharp:
- in , the middle bound is ;
- in , the left bound is ;
- in the same nonsplit sequence, the right bound is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; The three short exact sequences displayed in the Example; depth and regular sequences use Depth with respect to an ideal and Regular Sequence On A Module.
Verification
The maximal ideal of is . Multiplication by is injective on , so is an -regular sequence of length one. For any nonzero , write with and a unit, using the first nonzero coefficient of the power series. In , the class of is nonzero and is annihilated by every element of . Thus no regular sequence in has length two, and . The same annihilation gives .
The first sequence is split exact. The second and third sequences are exact because is a nonzerodivisor and its cokernel is . Every element of annihilates the nonzero element of , so this middle module has depth zero.
Substitution of the depth triples and into the three bounds of The three Depth Lemma inequalities gives the displayed equalities, so no lower bound can be increased in general.
A parameter sequence regular in a hypersurface
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, and let be a field. In , the pair is a system of parameters and a regular sequence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the displayed ring. Finite polynomial rings over a field are Noetherian and have dimension equal to their number of variables; localizations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every , A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian). Completion of a Noetherian local ring is Noetherian local and preserves its dimension under the assumed choice premise (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field, Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data). Systems of parameters have length equal to ring dimension and generate an ideal with maximal radical (Systems of parameters and parameter ideals).
Verification
For , the coordinate localization is Noetherian local. Its dimension is : the coordinate-prime chain has length , while localization cannot increase the dimension of the polynomial ring. The quotients are the degree- truncated polynomial rings. Their inverse limit is , since compatible truncations give exactly one coefficient per monomial and multiplication agrees coefficientwise. By the completion results in the Given paragraph, this series ring is Noetherian local of dimension , with maximal ideal generated by the variables and residue field . It is a domain: the lowest nonzero homogeneous parts of two nonzero series multiply to a nonzero polynomial over the field .
Put . Its quotient is Noetherian local. Every prime of containing contains or ; any chain of such primes lies above one of these two ideals and so has length at most , because and both have dimension . Either branch also supplies a chain of length , hence .
Suppose in . Reducing modulo gives in the domain , so ; reducing modulo similarly gives . Coefficientwise, in , so . Hence is a nonzerodivisor on .
The quotient is nonzero and has only one prime, , since is nilpotent and the quotient by is . Thus has radical the maximal ideal . Together with step 2.1, this makes a system of parameters.
After quotienting by one has as a -module. Multiplication by is injective on both summands, and the final quotient is nonzero by step 3.1. Therefore is a regular sequence on , as claimed.
A parameter sequence that fails in a non-Cohen--Macaulay ring
Example
In the one-dimensional local ring , the one-element sequence is a system of parameters but is not regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ex-non-cohen-macaulay-local-ring computes and .
Verification
The quotient has dimension , so is a parameter.
But the nonzero class of satisfies . Thus is a zero divisor and the parameter sequence is not regular, matching the depth gap .
Associated primes are unmixed in a Cohen--Macaulay example
Example
For , Both associated-prime quotients have dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is the Cohen--Macaulay hypersurface from ex-cohen-macaulay-ring-with-zero-divisors.
Verification
Put . Its quotients by and are the domains and . Also : a series divisible by both and has every monomial divisible by . Thus and are prime. In , the annihilator of the nonzero class of is , and that of is , so both primes are associated.
Let be represented by . If , then implies ; reduction in the domain forces , and the reverse inclusion follows from . Hence . Symmetrically, if , its annihilator is . If lies in neither ideal, reduction modulo each of and forces any annihilator into their intersection , so . The remaining case represents zero. Since in with , the zero ideal is not prime. Therefore and are the only associated primes.
Finally and , each of dimension by the cited hypersurface example. This verifies unmixedness directly.
A depth computation before and after completion
Example
Let Then is regular on both rings and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: both rings have dimension .
Verification
In either the localized polynomial ring or the formal power-series ring, if modulo , reduction modulo and modulo gives in the domain or and in or . Thus lies in both and , whose intersection is in each ambient ring. Hence is regular on both and .
The regular element gives depth at least , and the given dimension bound gives depth at most , on both sides. Thus both depths equal directly.