How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Set Theory Beyond Choice: Recorded, Not Proved Here
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
2 · Summary
These concrete examples compute the depth convention, show sharpness of the Depth Lemma, test parameter regularity and completion, and distinguish Cohen--Macaulayness from being a domain.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A zero-dimensional local ring is Cohen--Macaulay
Example
Let . This nonreduced local Artinian ring is Cohen--Macaulay of dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the unique prime and maximal ideal of is .
Verification
Since has one point, . The element is a zero divisor, so no positive-length regular sequence lies in the maximal ideal and .
Thus depth equals dimension. Equivalently, apply the general zero-dimensional corollary to the finite -module .
Polynomial rings are Cohen--Macaulay
Example
For every field and every integer , the polynomial ring is a Cohen--Macaulay ring. At the homogeneous maximal ideal , the variables form a regular system of parameters of the local ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field is a zero-dimensional Cohen--Macaulay ring.
Verification
Iterating thm-polynomial-extension-of-cohen-macaulay-rings shows that is globally Cohen--Macaulay.
In the localization at , multiplication by remains injective after quotienting by the preceding variables, and the terminal quotient is . Thus the displayed variables are a regular parameter system of length .
A non-Cohen--Macaulay local quotient
Example
Let be a field and let Then is a one-dimensional Noetherian local ring of depth , so it is not Cohen--Macaulay.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the radical of is .
Verification
Hence . The nonzero class of is annihilated by both and , so and .
The depth-zero criterion gives . Since , the ring is not Cohen--Macaulay.
A Cohen--Macaulay ring with zero divisors
Example
For a field , the ring is a one-dimensional Cohen--Macaulay local ring with nonzero zero divisors.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is a two-dimensional regular local domain and is nonzero.
Verification
Put . The sequence is a regular system of parameters of , so cor-one-regular-system-of-parameters-implies-cohen-macaulay makes Cohen--Macaulay. The nonzero element is -regular, and is a system of parameters because has finite length. Therefore thm-regular-quotients-and-cohen-macaulayness makes Cohen--Macaulay of dimension one.
The classes of and are nonzero but their product is zero. Hence is Cohen--Macaulay although it is not a domain.
A nonfree maximal Cohen--Macaulay module
Example
Let and . Then is a nonfree maximal Cohen--Macaulay -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and is finite.
Verification
Multiplication by is injective on , and is nonzero. Thus , while the dimension bound gives equality.
Hence , so is maximal Cohen--Macaulay. It is not free: the nonzero element annihilates all of , whereas a nonzero free -module has zero annihilator.
Depth of a hypersurface quotient
Example
Let be a regular local domain of dimension and let . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is Cohen--Macaulay of depth , and is a nonzerodivisor.
Verification
The depth quotient formula gives .
The principal ideal theorem and regularity of give . Thus the hypersurface quotient is Cohen--Macaulay.
Depth of a union of planes
Example
Let , , , and . The union of the two coordinate planes has but , so it is not Cohen--Macaulay.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is the maximal ideal and .
Verification
The standard fibre-product sequence is The middle term has depth , while the last term is and has depth .
Since the middle depth is strictly greater than the quotient depth, the unequal-depth consequence of the Depth Lemma gives . Both irreducible components have dimension , so .
The zero-module and surjective-ideal depth conventions
Example
For every commutative ring and ideal , . There are also nonzero examples with : for , , and , one has and hence .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is generated by the idempotent and is nonzero.
Verification
The exceptional clause in the definition applies to the zero module because . In the product-ring example, , so .
lem-depth-infinity-when-ideal-acts-surjectively therefore assigns in both cases. This does not conflict with Nakayama: the ideal in the nonzero example is not contained in the Jacobson radical.
Three sharp Depth Lemma inequalities
Example
Let and . The three Depth Lemma lower bounds are sharp:
- in , the middle bound is ;
- in , the left bound is ;
- in the same nonsplit sequence, the right bound is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
Verification
The first sequence is split exact. The second and third sequences are exact because is a nonzerodivisor and its cokernel is .
Substitution of the depth triples and gives the three equalities displayed above, so no lower bound can be increased in general.
A parameter sequence regular in a hypersurface
Example
In , the pair is a system of parameters and a regular sequence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is a two-dimensional hypersurface, hence Cohen--Macaulay.
Verification
The quotient by and is which is nonzero and zero-dimensional. Thus is a system of parameters.
Every system of parameters on a Cohen--Macaulay module is regular, so is a nonzerodivisor on and is a nonzerodivisor on .
A parameter sequence that fails in a non-Cohen--Macaulay ring
Example
In the one-dimensional local ring , the one-element sequence is a system of parameters but is not regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ex-non-cohen-macaulay-local-ring computes and .
Verification
The quotient has dimension , so is a parameter.
But the nonzero class of satisfies . Thus is a zero divisor and the parameter sequence is not regular, matching the depth gap .
Associated primes are unmixed in a Cohen--Macaulay example
Example
For , Both associated-prime quotients have dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is the Cohen--Macaulay hypersurface from ex-cohen-macaulay-ring-with-zero-divisors.
Verification
In , the annihilator of is and the annihilator of is , so both primes are associated. The hypersurface is reduced with these two minimal primes; the Cohen--Macaulay associated-prime theorem rules out embedded primes.
Finally and , each of dimension . This verifies unmixedness directly.
A depth computation before and after completion
Example
Let Then is regular on both rings and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: both rings have dimension .
Verification
If modulo , reduction modulo and modulo shows that lies in both and , hence in ; thus is regular in . Flat base change preserves its regularity in .
The regular element gives depth at least , and the dimension bound gives depth at most , on both sides. This also illustrates the general completion depth equality.