How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Direct integral of a constant Hilbert field
Example
Assume AC. Let be a sigma-finite standard-Borel measure space, and let be a separable complex Hilbert space with a fixed finite or countable orthonormal basis , where may be empty. For the constant field , define to be the quotient, modulo agreement off a Borel null set, of maps for which every coefficient is Borel measurable and . Then by the coordinate map which is a surjective linear isometry. Here the Hilbert sum on the right consists of coordinate classes with . If is countable with counting measure, the same direct integral is the ordinary Hilbert sum .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a sigma-finite standard-Borel measure space, a separable complex Hilbert space with a fixed finite or countable orthonormal basis, and the constant field with its coefficient-measurability convention.
The measurable-field convention uses measurable Gram coefficients and a fibrewise dense countable fundamental family; sections are tested against that family (Measurable Hilbert field from a countable fundamental family).
The direct integral is the quotient of square-integrable measurable sections by agreement off a measurable null set, with the integrated fibre inner product (Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field).
Complex scalar consists of measurable complex functions with finite , modulo almost-everywhere equality (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).
For a complete orthonormal family, Parseval gives , with the sum defined by finite subsum limits (Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family).
The nonnegative integral commutes with increasing pointwise limits (Monotone convergence for the integral).
The nonnegative integral is additive on finite sums of nonnegative measurable functions (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
Under AC, the direct integral of the stated field is complete (Direct integrals of measurable Hilbert fields are Hilbert spaces).
AC supplies a choice function for every family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
Enumerate the fixed basis as a sequence, extending it by zero sections if is finite or empty. These constant sections form a measurable fundamental family: their Gram coefficients are constant, and their span is dense in every fibre . Thus the field's measurable sections are exactly the maps tested by these coordinates, and its almost-everywhere quotient is the stated
Define by the displayed coordinate map. Each coordinate class belongs to scalar because Parseval and monotone convergence give The identity also shows that is well-defined on almost-everywhere classes, linear, and isometric; when is finite the increasing sums stabilize.
With counting measure on a countable standard-Borel , every section is measurable, the integral norm is , and the only null set is empty. The quotient therefore consists exactly of square-summable families in , with its ordinary Hilbert-sum norm.
For a finitely supported tuple , choose a Borel representative of each of its finitely many coordinates in the support; these finitely many existential instantiations require no choice axiom. The finite-coordinate section has measurable fundamental coefficients, and orthonormality gives . Additivity of the nonnegative integral makes this section square-integrable, and its coordinate image is the given tuple. Changing representatives changes the section only on a finite union of Borel null sets, so its class is independent of the representatives.
For an arbitrary square-summable tuple , its finite truncations converge in the Hilbert-sum norm. By step 2.1 each truncation has its canonical finite-coordinate section class; since is an isometry, these classes form a Cauchy sequence in the direct integral. AC supplies its completeness; the limit has coordinates because preserves distances and the truncations converge to that tuple. Hence is onto. No representatives are selected in this step: all tuples and sections are already almost-everywhere classes.
If or , both sides are the zero space; in the zero-fibre case the basis is empty and the coordinate sum has no terms. If with basis , is the identity on scalar . Finite nonzero-dimensional fibres use only their finitely many coordinates, and padding the measurable fundamental sequence by zero sections changes no coordinate or norm. A null base gives only the zero almost-everywhere class. AC is used in step 3.1 for the completeness theorem and in step 1.2 through Parseval's Countable Choice hypothesis; the fixed basis and coordinate truncations require no further choice. This example has no interval endpoint or if-and-only-if assertion. [F3, F4, F7, F8, step 1.2, step 3.1, algebra]
Source qualifications
Bekka–de la Harpe, Chapter 1 §1.G, Example 1.G.1(2), printed p. 60, identifies a constant separable Hilbert field with vector-valued using a fixed orthonormal basis; Example 1.G.1(1) gives the counting-measure Hilbert sum. The coordinate norm calculation, onto argument, and zero- and finite-dimensional cases are proved above. Bruhat, Part III Chapter 10 §§1.3–1.5, printed pp. 95–96, treats a continuous/Lusin field convention and fibrewise orthogonalization; no topological continuity assumption from that setting is used here.
Boundary cases
- Empty: gives the zero spaces, as checked in step 4.1.
- Zero: gives no coordinates and zero norm, as checked in step 4.1.
- One: with gives scalar , as checked in step 4.1.
- Degenerate: finite bases are exhausted after finitely many coordinates; padded zero sections and null representatives are handled in steps 1.1–3.1.
- Endpoints: not applicable; the base is an arbitrary measure space and has no interval parameter.
- Nonempty choice: AC is used exactly as stated in step 4.1; step 3.1 uses completeness and no representative selection.
- Iff directions: not applicable; the example asserts an isometric identification, not an equivalence.
Depends on
- Measurable Hilbert field from a countable fundamental family
- Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field
- Direct integrals of measurable Hilbert fields are Hilbert spaces
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Bekka and P. de la Harpe, Unitary Representations of Groups, Duals, and Characters (standard reference, not scraped)
- F. Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Ch. 10 (standard reference, not scraped)