How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distinct states with equal flux give a stationary weak discontinuity
Example
Let and . Since , the Rankine--Hugoniot speed of the jump is : the function for and for is a stationary weak solution of with the corresponding Riemann data. It is also entropic: the chord condition of The convex entropy condition for a single shock is the chord condition with requires the graph of on to lie below the chord through the endpoints, and that chord is the constant line , with throughout. Thus yields a zero-speed admissible shock; admissibility was a separate check and did not follow from the jump condition (Kruzhkov entropy solutions, The self-similar Riemann problem).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the flux , the states , the stationary profile for and for , the Riemann datum for , for , and a test function .
Rankine--Hugoniot and the entropy criterion at a single jump: for a jump with speed the condition is , and, with , the jump satisfies the entropy inequality for all convex entropy pairs if and only if for all between and (The Rankine--Hugoniot jump condition in space--time normal form, The convex entropy condition for a single shock is the chord condition).
Kruzhkov entropy solutions: the pairs are , , and the distributional inequalities must hold for every ; the initial trace is the strong local trace (Kruzhkov entropy solutions).
The square function is (strictly) convex on (its Jensen gap is for and ), hence is a strictly convex flux, and for while the chord through is the horizontal line at height .
The Riemann problem prescribes constant states on the two half-lines and admits self-similar solutions; the profile above is stationary and depends only on , hence has the form with for , for (The self-similar Riemann problem).
Proof
The jump speed vanishes. With , , : , so [F1] gives .
The stationary jump is a weak solution with the stated datum. Since takes only the values , one has almost everywhere, and is independent of . Hence for every , because the inner -integral of vanishes by compact support in time and the inner -integral of vanishes by compact support in space. Since identically, the strong local initial trace condition holds with vanishing error. Thus is a distributional weak solution with Riemann datum , and by [F4] it is the stationary self-similar profile of that Riemann problem.
Chord check. For the jump with speed , [F1] gives for by [F3], while ; hence for every between the states, and the chord condition holds. Equivalently, the chord through and is the constant line and the parabola lies below it on .
The Kruzhkov inequalities. For general , both and are piecewise constant with a single jump at , and does not depend on , so and in distributions. With one computes , because exactly when , where , and for the last bracket vanishes. Hence all Kruzhkov entropy inequalities hold with a nonpositive measure.
Conclusion. The jump has speed by step 1.1, the nonzero difference of states produces a genuine discontinuity, and the entropy inequalities hold for all Kruzhkov pairs by step 3.1 (with the smooth-pair check of step 2.1 as the geometric form of the same condition), so is a bounded Kruzhkov entropy solution whose flux values at the two states coincide. The equal flux values were responsible for the vanishing speed, while admissibility had to be verified separately through the chord condition.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. A. Chechkin and A. Yu. Goritsky (translated by B. Andreianov), “S. N. Kruzhkov’s lectures on first-order quasilinear PDEs,” in Analytical and Numerical Aspects of PDEs, de Gruyter 2009, complete lecture-notes text (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alberto Bressan, “Hyperbolic Conservation Laws: An Illustrated Tutorial,” 2009, complete lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)