Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine flux reduces the entropy semigroup to translation

Statement

Assume countable choice and dependent choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain), as used by the translation-continuity and entropy-semigroup results below. Let f(u)=cu+d, with c,d∈R, and let u0∈L1(R)∩L∞(R). The entropy solution is u(t,x)=u0(x−ct). For every convex entropy pair (η,q), q′(u)=cη′(u), hence q(u)=cη(u)+C; the transport change of variables gives ∂tη(u)+∂xq(u)=0 in distributions, so entropy production is zero. Any jump already present in u0 translates at speed c with the same left and right states and zero production [q]−c[η]=0; the affine evolution creates no new shocks. In particular the semigroup of The entropy solution semigroup on L1∩L∞ is Stu0=u0(⋅−ct) (Scalar conservation laws, fluxes and Cauchy data, Kruzhkov entropy solutions, Distributional weak solutions of the Cauchy problem).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: an affine flux f(u)=cu+d, a datum u0∈L1(R)∩L∞(R), the translated profile u(t,x)=u0(x−ct), and a test function φ∈Cc∞(ΠT).

[F1]

Translation invariance: the maps y↦y+ct preserve Lebesgue measure; integrals of integrable functions are invariant under measure-preserving transformations, so ∫Rv(x−ct) dx=∫Rv(y) dy, and with Fubini the substitution y=x−ct is legitimate in the space--time integrals below (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation, Measure-preserving transformations and systems, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, Translation of a function on Rn).

[F2]

Calculus: the chain rule gives ∂t[φ(t,y+ct)]=φt(t,y+ct)+cφx(t,y+ct) at y=x−ct, and the fundamental theorem of calculus with compact support gives ∫Rφx(t,x) dx=0 and ∫0Tφt(t,x) dt=0 for compactly supported φ (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

[F3]

Entropy pairs for an affine flux: q′=η′f′=cη′, so q=cη+C on the real line; a jump of the translated profile has [q]=c[η]+[C]=c[η], hence zero production [q]−c[η]=0 (Convex entropy--entropy flux pairs, Kruzhkov entropy solutions).

[F4]

The semigroup: for a locally Lipschitz C1 flux and data in L1∩L∞ the entropy solution is unique and the flow defines St; for f(0)=0 globally Lipschitz it extends to all of L1 (The entropy solution semigroup on L1∩L∞, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain); translation is continuous in L1, so ∥u0(⋅−ct)−u0∥1→0 as t↓0 (∥τhf−f∥p→0 in Lp(Rn) as h→0, for 1≤p<∞, Translation of a function on Rn).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

The translate solves the conservation law. Substituting y=x−ct in the weak pairing and using [F1]: ∫ΠT(uφt+f(u)φx)dx dt=∫ΠT(u0(y)φt(t,y+ct)+c u0(y)φx(t,y+ct)+d φx(t,y+ct))dy dt. The constant term vanishes, by [F2] applied to φx; the remaining terms equal ∫ΠTu0(y) ∂t[φ(t,y+ct)] dy dt by the chain rule, which is 0 because φ has compact support in time. Hence u is a distributional weak solution of ut+∂x(cu+d)=0.

1.2F1F2F3

Zero entropy production. Let (η,q) be any locally Lipschitz convex pair with q′=η′f′=cη′, so q=cη+C by [F3]. Applying the same substitution to η(u(t,x))=η(u0(x−ct)) and q(u)=c η(u0(x−ct))+C gives ∫ΠT(η(u)φt+q(u)φx)=∫ΠTη(u0(y))[φt(t,y+ct)+cφx(t,y+ct)]dy dt+C∫ΠTφx=∫ΠTη(u0(y)) ∂t[φ(t,y+ct)] dy dt+0=0, using the chain rule [F2] and the vanishing of the constant term there. Thus the entropy production vanishes in distributions; for a jump already present in u0 this is the statement [q]−c[η]=0 of [F3], so the jump keeps its states and produces no dissipation.

2.1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2∎

Initial trace and identification with the semigroup. The initial trace is immediate: u(t,x)=u0(x−ct) gives ∥u(t,⋅)−u0∥1=∥u0(⋅−ct)−u0∥1→0 as t↓0 by translation continuity in L1 [F4]. The profile is therefore a Kruzhkov entropy solution with datum u0 (weak equation, all entropy inequalities, strong trace), and by uniqueness in [F4] it agrees with the semigroup flow: Stu0=u0(⋅−ct) for all t≥0.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources