How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite sample can report cost satisfaction while the policy violates its expected-cost limit
Example
In a one-state CMDP with , cost for risky and for safe, let a stationary policy choose risky with probability and impose the expected-cost limit . The true expected discounted cost is . In ten independent one-step rollouts, the empirical mean cost is zero whenever every action is safe, an event of probability .
Example references
A finite CMDP includes bounded transition costs and stationary randomized policies.
Expected discounted-cost feasibility constraint: Expected discounted-cost feasibility is defined by the population objective .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: One state, two actions, cost for risky and for safe, discount , policy probability for risky, and threshold .
Finite discounted constrained Markov decision process: the one-step transition law and cost signal determine the expected cost at each time.
Expected discounted-cost feasibility constraint: at , the expected discounted cost equals the initial expected one-step cost.
Verification
The policy's expected one-step cost is . Since , [F2] gives .
Each of the ten independent rollouts is safe with probability , so the probability all ten are safe is . On this event the empirical mean is , despite step 1.1 showing that the population constraint is violated.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.