Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite sample can report cost satisfaction while the policy violates its expected-cost limit

Example

In a one-state CMDP with γ=0, cost 1 for risky and 0 for safe, let a stationary policy choose risky with probability 1/10 and impose the expected-cost limit b=1/20. The true expected discounted cost is 1/10>b. In ten independent one-step rollouts, the empirical mean cost is zero whenever every action is safe, an event of probability (9/10)10=3,486,784,401/10,000,000,000.

Example references

A finite CMDP includes bounded transition costs and stationary randomized policies.

Expected discounted-cost feasibility constraint: Expected discounted-cost feasibility is defined by the population objective Jcπ(μ)≤b.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: One state, two actions, cost 1 for risky and 0 for safe, discount γ=0, policy probability 1/10 for risky, and threshold b=1/20.

[F1]

Finite discounted constrained Markov decision process: the one-step transition law and cost signal determine the expected cost at each time.

[F2]

Expected discounted-cost feasibility constraint: at γ=0, the expected discounted cost equals the initial expected one-step cost.

Verification

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

The policy's expected one-step cost is (1/10)⋅1+(9/10)⋅0=1/10. Since γ=0, [F2] gives Jcπ(μ)=1/10>1/20=b.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra∎

Each of the ten independent rollouts is safe with probability 9/10, so the probability all ten are safe is (9/10)10=3,486,784,401/10,000,000,000. On this event the empirical mean is 0≤b, despite step 1.1 showing that the population constraint is violated.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.