Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ext zero as Hom in both constructions

Example

Write the degree-zero identifications in the projective and injective complexes and compare them through balanced Ext.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Objects M,N in an abelian category, an augmented projective resolution P∙↠M, and an augmented injective resolution N↪I∙.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The augmentation identifies M=coker⁡(d1:P1→P0), so left exactness of Hom⁡(−,N) identifies ker⁡(Hom⁡(P0,N)→Hom⁡(P1,N)) with Hom⁡(M,N). Thus Ext⁡P0(M,N)=Hom⁡(M,N).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Likewise N=ker⁡(d0:I0→I1), and left exactness of Hom⁡(M,−) gives ker⁡(Hom⁡(M,I0)→Hom⁡(M,I1))=Hom⁡(M,N). The two identifications are the degree-zero maps used in balanced Ext⁡0(M,N).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources