How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The degree-zero injective construction of Ext is Hom
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice, and let be supplied injective resolution data on the objects under consideration. For , gives a natural isomorphism .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed injective resolution and an object .
Proof
Exactness gives ; thus is a degree-zero cocycle, and is injective because is monic.
If , then factors uniquely through . Since there are no negative-degree coboundaries, this is the required identification. Precomposition makes it natural in . For , choose a comparison extension between the supplied resolutions; its degree-zero square with the coaugmentations commutes, so the identification is natural in , and the independence lemma makes this map independent of the chosen extension.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)