Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A failed principal-parts problem detected by residues on a complex torus

Example

Assume full AC (The Axiom of Choice). Let X=C/Λ for a full complex lattice Λ, with origin o=[0] and local quotient coordinate z centred at o. Prescribe the function-valued principal parts ηo=[1/z]∈Mo/Oo,ηp=0(p≠o). There is no global meromorphic function with these principal parts. A putative solution would have divisor [q]−[o] for a point q≠o, and would give a degree-one proper holomorphic map to the sphere, contradicting the torus genus 1.

The obstruction is the residue of a differential, rather than an invariant residue of a function germ: the nowhere-vanishing holomorphic differential ω=dz gives ∑p∈XRes⁡p(ηpω)=Res⁡o(dz/z)=1≠0. All holomorphic differentials are constant multiples of dz, so the corresponding residue functional is c dz↦c. For a finite good cover and compatible comparison data as constructed below, the necessary-and-sufficient criterion of Prescribed principal parts on a compact Riemann surface detects exactly this obstruction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a full lattice Λ, its torus X, and the principal part 1/z at o with zero principal parts elsewhere.

[F1]

Full AC is inherited through RR, duality and the good-cover comparison chain (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

The quotient torus is compact with local lift charts and translation transitions. Its proof gives δ>0 such that distinct lattice points are separated by at least δ (Complex lattice and quotient torus, The quotient C/Λ is a compact Riemann surface).

[F3]

A principal part is a finite negative Laurent polynomial. A differential's residue is its coefficient of z−1dz, independent of coordinates (The principal part at an isolated singularity, Meromorphic differentials, orders and residues).

[F4]

Analytic RR gives ℓ(0)=1, i(0)=g and the canonical-divisor formula; Serre duality gives i(A)=ℓ(K−A) (The Riemann-Roch theorem on a compact Riemann surface, Serre duality on a compact Riemann surface).

[F5]

Principal divisors have degree zero; meromorphic functions on compact X are proper maps to the sphere when nonconstant, with pole order equal to fibre multiplicity (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface).

[F6]

Proper nonconstant holomorphic maps have positive weighted fibre degree, and multiplicity one gives a holomorphic local inverse; genus is invariant under biholomorphism and the sphere has genus zero (Degree of a proper holomorphic map of Riemann surfaces, Local power-map normal form on Riemann surfaces, Genus and Euler characteristic of a compact Riemann surface).

[F7]

The residues of a global meromorphic differential on compact X sum to zero (Residue theorem on a compact Riemann surface).

[F8]

The bundle OX(0) has a global frame 1. A finite good cover has disc chart members and disc-biholomorphic nonempty finite intersections. Under full AC a contractible proper plane domain is biholomorphic to a disc by the grand simple-connectivity equivalence (The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor, Cech cohomology of holomorphic sections of a line bundle on finite good covers, For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).

[F9]

Compatible metrics exist under countable choice, hence full AC (Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface).

[F10]

A supplied finite good cover subordinate to holomorphic frame domains has the canonical sheaf/Čech/Dolbeault comparison (Cech--Dolbeault comparison for holomorphic line bundles on a compact Riemann surface). With this comparison and supplied compatible metrics, principal parts are realizable if and only if their residue sum paired against every holomorphic differential is zero; the pairing is independent of representatives and cover (Prescribed principal parts on a compact Riemann surface).

Verification

1.1F1F2F3F4givenalgebra

By [F2], local lift coordinates differ by translations, so their differentials glue to a nowhere-zero holomorphic differential ω=dz with K=(ω)=0. By [F4], i(0)=ℓ(K)=ℓ(0)=1, so g=1 and h0(X,KX)=1. Thus every holomorphic differential is c dz. The prescribed principal part is nonzero by [F3] and would force a simple pole at o with no other poles.

2.1F3F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

If a meromorphic function f realized the data, [F5] would give (f)=E−[o] with E effective of degree one. Hence E=[q] and q≠o. The weighted fibre over infinity has one simple point, so [F6] gives degree one; every fibre is then one point of multiplicity one. The local holomorphic inverses in [F6] glue to a global inverse, making X biholomorphic to the sphere, contrary to g=1 in step 1.1. Independently, fω would have residue 1 at o and zero elsewhere by [F3], contradicting [F7]. This directly proves nonsolvability without a good-cover hypothesis.

3.1F2F3F8F9F10step 1.1chooseconstructalgebra∎

Choose 0<r<δ/4 using [F2]. The quotient images of radius-r plane balls cover X and are disc chart domains; compactness gives a finite subcover. In the lift of any one member, another member that intersects it has at most one relevant translated radius-r ball: two such centres would be within 4r<δ of each other, contrary to [F2]. Thus every nonempty finite intersection lifts injectively to an intersection of finitely many plane balls. It is bounded, open and convex; straight-line contraction to an interior point makes it contractible, and [F8] makes it disc-biholomorphic. This is a finite good cover subordinate to the global holomorphic frame 1 of OX(0) from [F8]. Supply compatible metrics by [F9]; the canonical comparison in [F10] supplies the comparison map used by its residue criterion. By [F3], pairing the data with c dz gives Res⁡o(c dz/z)=c, since all other terms vanish; replacing the representative 1/z by a holomorphic perturbation leaves this residue unchanged. Step 1.1 identifies the entire differential space, so this is the complete residue functional, and [F10] is the exact necessary-and-sufficient obstruction criterion. Its value 1 at dz proves the claimed failure.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

166 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources