Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The certified FAS contraction radius shrinks at a pitchfork

Statement

For Fμ(x,y)=(μx+x3,y) with zero right side, use the coarse space spanned by (0,1)T, iterate and residual restriction I(x,y)=R(x,y)=y, coarse residual FH(v)=v, and one pre- and one post-sweep Sμ(x,y)=(x−12(μx+x3),y/2). The exact-branch FAS cycle has root (0,0) and derivative norm qμ=(1−μ/2)2(0<μ≤1). For each such μ, the local theorem certifies radius rμ=μ/100, which tends to zero as the pitchfork parameter approaches 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<μ≤1, the two-dimensional fine residual, zero right side, the stated transfers and coarse residual, one pre/post smoother, exact coarse solve, and exact arithmetic.

[F1]

Finite-budget nonlinear FAS two-grid cycle: the coarse target is FH(Iu)+R(−Fμ(u)) and the correction is u+P(v−Iu).

[F2]

A smooth FAS cycle converges locally under its actual derivative bounds: if the actual exact-branch cycle has root derivative norm q, derivative-Lipschitz constant L on a radius-r ball, and q+Lr/2<1, then its iterates converge to the root from that ball.

[F4]

Second derivative formula for a composed cycle map: applying the second-derivative composition formula with identity middle map gives (sμ∘sμ)′′=sμ′′(sμ)(sμ′)2+sμ′(sμ)sμ′′.

Example

Given: The scalar function sμ(x)=(1−μ/2)x−x3/2, the radius rμ=μ/100, and the exact coarse branch.

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

Let P(v)=(0,v)T. For any pre-smoothed (x,y), [F1] gives gH=FH(y)+R(−Fμ(x,y))=y−y=0. The exact coarse solution is v=0, so prolonging v−I(x,y)=−y sets the second fine coordinate to zero. The following post-sweep leaves it zero. Hence the actual cycle map is Eμ(x,y)=(sμ(sμ(x)),0).

1.2givenF3F4algebra

Write a=1−μ/2 and r=rμ≤0.1. For ∣x∣≤r, ∣sμ(x)∣≤r+12r3≤1.005r,∣sμ′(x)∣≤1.015,∣sμ′(sμ(x))∣≤1.02, and ∣sμ′′(x)∣≤3r, ∣sμ′′(sμ(x))∣≤3.015r. By [F4], (sμ∘sμ)′′=sμ′′(sμ)(sμ′)2+sμ′(sμ)sμ′′, so these bounds give ∣(sμ∘sμ)′′(x)∣<7r. The derivative matrix of Eμ is diag⁡((sμ∘sμ)′(x),0), so [F3] gives ∥DEμ(z)−DEμ(z′)∥op≤7r∥z−z′∥2 on the ball.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Since Fμ(x,y)=0 implies y=0 and x(μ+x2)=0, for μ>0 the unique fine root is (0,0). Also sμ′(0)=1−μ/2, so differentiating the two sweeps gives DEμ(0,0)=((1−μ/2)2000),qμ=(1−μ/2)2.

3.1F2step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

With r2=μ/100, qμ+(7r)r2=(1−μ/2)2+7μ200=1−193200μ+14μ2≤1−143200μ<1. Thus [F2] applies on this ball. Its certified radius rμ=μ/100 tends to zero as μ↓0; at μ=0, q0=1 and the strict derivative hypothesis fails. For μ<0, the scalar equation μx+x3=0 has the additional roots x=±−μ, which is the pitchfork bifurcation.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.