How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The certified FAS contraction radius shrinks at a pitchfork
Statement
For with zero right side, use the coarse space spanned by , iterate and residual restriction , coarse residual , and one pre- and one post-sweep . The exact-branch FAS cycle has root and derivative norm For each such , the local theorem certifies radius , which tends to zero as the pitchfork parameter approaches .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the two-dimensional fine residual, zero right side, the stated transfers and coarse residual, one pre/post smoother, exact coarse solve, and exact arithmetic.
Finite-budget nonlinear FAS two-grid cycle: the coarse target is and the correction is .
A smooth FAS cycle converges locally under its actual derivative bounds: if the actual exact-branch cycle has root derivative norm , derivative-Lipschitz constant on a radius- ball, and , then its iterates converge to the root from that ball.
On a convex open set, a uniform bound implies : a uniform derivative bound on a convex open set gives a Lipschitz bound there.
Second derivative formula for a composed cycle map: applying the second-derivative composition formula with identity middle map gives .
Example
Given: The scalar function , the radius , and the exact coarse branch.
Verification
Let . For any pre-smoothed , [F1] gives The exact coarse solution is , so prolonging sets the second fine coordinate to zero. The following post-sweep leaves it zero. Hence the actual cycle map is
Write and . For , and , . By [F4], , so these bounds give . The derivative matrix of is , so [F3] gives on the ball.
Since implies and , for the unique fine root is . Also , so differentiating the two sweeps gives
With , Thus [F2] applies on this ball. Its certified radius tends to zero as ; at , and the strict derivative hypothesis fails. For , the scalar equation has the additional roots , which is the pitchfork bifurcation.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.