How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Delta and constant functions are finite DFT extremisers
Example
Let , let be the delta at the class of and let be the constant function . Then Hence and , so both functions have support product and attain equality in Finite support-product uncertainty for the unitary DFT. At one has and the two identities coincide.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the functions with , for , and for all , the unitary transform of The unitary discrete Fourier transform on (The congruence class and the quotient set , The counting inner product on ).
Character orthogonality: for and , when and otherwise; at the congruence always holds and the sum is (Orthogonality of the characters on ).
Rational powers: is the positive real number with and ; the usual power laws hold (Rational powers of a positive base, Laws of rational exponents), and complex arithmetic is that of the field ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse ).
Finite support-product uncertainty: for every nonzero , with (Finite support-product uncertainty for the unitary DFT).
Verification
The transform of the delta. In the defining sum every summand with vanishes by definition of , and the summand at equals . Hence for every , that is, .
The transform of the constant function. For a frequency representative , . Apply [F1] with its first parameter and second parameter : the sum is when and otherwise. Hence at and elsewhere, that is, .
Supports, equality, and the case . By step 1.1 the support of is the support of the constant function , namely all classes, while has one element; by step 1.2 the support of is , while has elements. Multiplying gives and , so both attain the equality case of the bound [F3]. At the group has the single class , so and , and the two identities of steps 1.1 and 1.2 coincide.
Depends on
- The counting inner product on $\mathbb C^{\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z}$
- The congruence class $[a]_n$ and the quotient set $\mathbb{Z}/n$
- Rational powers $a^r$ of a positive base
- The unitary discrete Fourier transform on $\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z$
- Orthogonality of the characters $x\mapsto e^{2\pi ikx/N}$ on $\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z$
- Laws of rational exponents
- $\mathbb C=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field, every element is uniquely $a+bi$, and every nonzero element has inverse $(a-bi)/(a^2+b^2)$
- Finite support-product uncertainty for the unitary DFT
Used by
- Both finite supports cannot be singletons when N>1 Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael E. Taylor, Fourier Analysis, Distributions, and Constant-Coefficient Linear PDE (author PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, An Uncertainty Principle for Cyclic Groups of Prime Order, Math. Res. Lett. 12 (2005) 121–127 (arXiv:math/0308286) (standard reference, not scraped)