How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Numerics for the first and second Mertens theorems
Example
For the weighted and reciprocal prime sums compare with their main terms as follows:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The cutoffs .
The first Mertens theorem controls by (Mertens' first theorem for primes).
The second Mertens theorem controls by (Mertens' second theorem for primes).
Verification
Summing over the primes up to , , and gives the four numerical columns in the displayed table.
At each of these three cutoffs, the reciprocal sum is numerically closer to than the weighted sum is to . This small-range comparison is consistent with the nonzero bounded terms allowed by [L1] and [L2], but it is numerical evidence only and does not compare their asymptotic error strengths.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Leo Goldmakher, A Quick Proof of Mertens' Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)