Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Geometric Brownian motion and the Milstein update

Example

For μ,ν,x0∈R, consider the geometric Brownian SDE dXt=μXt dt+νXt dWt,X0=x0. A solution is Xt=x0exp⁡((μ−ν2/2)t+νWt). On a grid step of length h, the scalar Milstein update is Yn+1=Yn(1+μh+νΔWn+12ν2((ΔWn)2−h)). This example verifies the exact-solution form and the update algebra; it makes no global rate claim under the bounded-coefficient hypotheses of the strong-order theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a filtered probability space whose filtration satisfies the usual conditions; and a standard Brownian motion W adapted to that filtration such that Wt−Ws is independent of Fs and has law N(0,t−s) for every 0≤s<t (for example, the usual augmentation of the natural filtration of W), as required by Continuous Brownian Ito processes; real constants μ,ν,x0; and a finite interval.

[F1]

Milstein updates, iterated Brownian integrals, and commutative noise: the scalar update is Yn+1=Yn+b(Yn)h+σ(Yn)ΔWn+12σ(Yn)σ′(Yn)((ΔWn)2−h).

[F2]

Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes: for a smooth function of a Brownian It^o process, the drift includes one half of the Hessian applied to the instantaneous covariance.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited from the Brownian and It^o interface [F2].

Verification

Given: The assumptions above.

1.1F2A1given

Define G(t,w)=x0e(μ−ν2/2)t+νw. Its derivatives are Gt=(μ−ν2/2)G, Gw=νG, and Gww=ν2G. It^o's formula [F2] therefore gives dG(t,Wt)=(μ−ν2/2)Gdt+12ν2Gdt+νGdWt=μGdt+νGdWt, with G(0,W0)=x0. Thus the displayed process solves the SDE, including x0=0.

2.1F1givenalgebra∎

For b(x)=μx and σ(x)=νx, σ′(x)=ν and σ(x)σ′(x)=ν2x. Substituting these coefficients into [F1] and factoring Yn gives the displayed Milstein update. If ν=0, its correction vanishes and it reduces to the deterministic Euler step.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources