How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bounded scalar multiplicative-noise Milstein step
Example
Consider the bounded scalar multiplicative-noise SDE with , and initialize the numerical method with . Fix and an integer with , and use the uniform grid for . At the state , its first Milstein step is Unlike additive noise, the diffusion derivative contributes a nonzero centered correction. The hypotheses of the strong-order theorem apply to this coefficient field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a filtered probability space whose filtration satisfies the usual conditions; and a standard Brownian motion adapted to that filtration such that is independent of and has law for every (for example, the usual augmentation of the natural filtration of ), as required by Continuous Brownian Ito processes; the SDE initial value and matching numerical initial value ; and a fixed horizon with an integer , the uniform grid for , and .
Milstein updates, iterated Brownian integrals, and commutative noise: for scalar noise, the increment contains .
Standard normal and normal laws: if , then its first, second, third and fourth moments are .
Strong order one for scalar and commutative-noise Milstein schemes: for coefficients in under the stated Brownian hypotheses, the grid root-mean-square error is .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited through the Brownian/strong-Milstein interface [L1].
Verification
Given: The assumptions above.
Here , , and . At , both and equal , so [F1] gives the stated update with correction coefficient . The function and its derivatives through order three are bounded and continuous, so it meets the regularity premise of [L1].
By [F2], the correction has conditional mean and variance . Its covariance with the linear noise term is . Hence the one-step increment variance is , and the derivative correction is a separate nonzero fluctuation.
Applying [L1] to the SDE with and yields , with independent of , on the supplied uniform grid. Taking square roots yields grid root-mean-square error on every fixed finite horizon. This is the theorem's bounded-coefficient multiplicative-noise case under the inherited AC convention [A1]; it supplies no weak-order-two statement for Heun.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Desmond J. Higham, An Algorithmic Introduction to Numerical Simulation of Stochastic Differential Equations, SIAM Review 43 (2001), Section 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kloeden and Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations, Section 10.3, printed pp. 345-351 (standard reference, not scraped)