How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A diagonal substitution worked symbolically
Example
Take in the diagonal construction. With D representing the diagonal substitution function d, let , , and . Then and Q proves .
Facts & Assumptions
The syntactic diagonal lemma: For every formula with no other free variables in an effective signature extending arithmetic, there is a sentence such that Q in that signature proves . The construction is effective and requires neither consistency nor soundness.
Verification
Given: The explicit tautological psi and the fixed diagonal construction with its representing graph D.
The substitution operation in F1 takes the formula eta with its designated x place and inserts the numeral . Thus . Here e is a natural number, eta is a formula, and the inserted is a term; none is identified with the other. The unique-value property used in F1 gives .
If theta holds, choose its y witness; the equation in step 1.1 replaces y with the numeral of theta, yielding that numeral equal to itself. Conversely that reflexive equality and give the existential theta. Thus in this concrete instance Q proves theta, as well as the displayed biconditional. The calculation is independent of which fixed token numbering produces the numerical value e.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Moschovakis, Lecture Notes in Logic (2014) — 4B.14 p149; local tautological substitution instance (standard reference, not scraped)
- Avigad, Computability and Incompleteness (2007) — Lemma 4.5.1 proof p109 (standard reference, not scraped)